测试表明,汽车玻璃破碎器无法破坏现代汽车玻璃。
Testing Shows Automotive Glassbreakers Can't Break Modern Automotive Glass

原始链接: https://www.core77.com/posts/138925/Testing-Shows-Automotive-Glassbreakers-Cant-Break-Modern-Automotive-Glass

“汽车逃生工具”市场——包括车窗破坏器和安全带切割器——正在蓬勃发展,预计到2033年将达到900亿美元,这得益于利用人们对涉及火灾或浸水的交通事故的恐惧进行的营销。然而,这些工具的有效性很大程度上是虚假的。 虽然被宣传为救命工具,但涉及这些特定情况的事故非常罕见。更重要的是,现代汽车越来越多地使用夹层安全玻璃作为侧窗玻璃——这是安全法规要求的变化——这些工具*无法*打破。美国汽车协会(AAA)的测试表明,大多数玻璃破坏器即使在较旧的钢化玻璃上也会失效,经常会损坏*自身*。 安全带切割器对需要快速接近事故受害者的一线响应者来说是有用的,但对普通驾驶员的益处值得怀疑。该市场依靠销售一种戏剧性且不太可能的救援幻想,利用消费者的焦虑而非真正的安全需求。

一篇最近在Hacker News上分享的文章测试了汽车玻璃破碎器的有效性,发现它们很难打破现代汽车的车窗。 这引发了关于为什么这没有成为标准安全测试的讨论,一位评论员建议碰撞前测试可以解决这个问题。 用户也分享了个人安全担忧,例如在叫车时感到脆弱,解释了为什么有些人会携带这些工具。 一条幽默但阴暗的评论提到旧金山,提出了一种独特的(且不可靠的)逃生方法——依靠当地以砸车窗取回小物品的人。 这篇帖子引起了人们对汽车安全以及现有应急工具局限性的兴趣。
相关文章

原文

It's easy to convince EDC people to buy EDC things. But how do you convince non-EDC folks to buy your product?

Simple: Fear.

The global "car escape tool market," according to market research firm Data Insights Market, is valued at $500 million this year, projected to grow 7% a year and hit $900 million in 2033. The trend is being driven by "heightened safety concerns among consumers."

A big seller in this category is the automotive window breaker and seat belt cutter. The fantasy being peddled by the toolmakers is: You will crash, remain conscious, find that your car has burst into flame or is slowly sinking in water, find that you cannot undo your seatbelt, yet are still able to reach for this specialty tool, slice through your seatbelt, then smash the window open and climb free to safety.

This image sure looks real to us!

Accidents that involve fire or water are less than half of one percent of all accidents, according to the NHTSA. And the amount of accidents where the above scenario actually occurred, and that tool saved lives, is not recorded as a statistic. Similarly, seat belt jamming is so rare that neither the NHTSA nor the AAA track it as a statistic.

As for the glassbreakers, here's the big thing that most people don't realize: They're designed to break tempered glass, which is what most cars used to have for the side windows. However, modern safety regulations—specifically, the "Ejection Mitigation Rule" in the 2013 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 226 (FMVSS 226), mean that most manufacturers have transitioned to laminated glass for the side windows.

Laminated glass (which is what the windshields were already made of) is tougher to break, and is now used to prevent occupants from being ejected through the side glass.

An AAA research report tested six commonly-available glassbreakers. Not a single one of them was capable of breaking through laminated glass—and two of the tools couldn't even break through tempered glass, but instead broke themselves. On the glass.

It's true that not all automakers have switched over to laminated glass for the side windows; the FMVSS 226 law stipulates that you can get around it if you install elaborate side airbags that also prevent ejection.

The automakers that are using laminated side glass are only: Acura, Audi, BMW, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, Genesis, GMC, Honda, Hyundai, Infiniti, Jaguar, Jeep, Kia, Land Rover, Lexus, Lincoln, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Porsche, Ram, Subaru, Toyota, Volkswagen and Volvo. Some of them, like Chevy and BMW, have been using laminated glass since the '70s and '80s. Glassbreakers might only be useful if you're driving around in a classic car and believe you'll become submerged.

That said, seatbelt cutters are of supreme use to firefighters, EMTs and other first responders who may not be able to reach an unconscious accident victim's seatbelt release. So there might be a case for them if you see yourself in a situation where you need to free an unconscious person, and have the training to safely extricate them.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com