致 FreeBSD 的一封情书
A Love Letter to FreeBSD

原始链接: https://www.tara.sh/posts/2025/2025-11-25_freebsd_letter/

这封信表达了对FreeBSD稳定、连贯和深思熟虑的设计的深刻 appreciation,与其它操作系统的“噪音”形成鲜明对比。作者将FreeBSD设想为现代“开源大型机”,优先考虑长期可靠性和以*年*为单位计量的正常运行时间,让人联想到Solaris和IBM大型机等经典系统。 主要愿望包括保持坚如磐石的核心系统,以及拥有清晰稳定性等级的更快速发展的软件包生态系统。作者强调FreeBSD独特的、注重工程和协作的文化的重要性,敦促即使在扩展到桌面领域时,也要继续关注服务器级的稳定性。 实际建议包括加强与硬件厂商的关系和改进固件管理。最终,作者希望FreeBSD能够保持其独特性——一个为持久性能和信任而构建的平台,为其他操作系统不断变化的选择提供稳定的替代方案。他们认为,在瞬息万变的潮流中,FreeBSD将代表持久的质量。

## 致 FreeBSD 的一封情书:摘要 这次 Hacker News 的讨论围绕着对 FreeBSD 的怀旧赞赏,并将其与 Linux 的演变进行对比。许多评论者强调 FreeBSD 的稳定性、连贯的设计以及对深思熟虑的工程学的关注——这些品质在 Linux 世界的“炒作”和快速变化中常常被遗失。 关键点包括对 FreeBSD 的 ZFS 集成、 jails 和可预测的发布周期的高度赞扬,以及对 Linux 的 systemd 和容器化方法的批评。 几位用户分享了长期运行 FreeBSD 服务器的经验,强调了它的可靠性和低维护性。 然而,讨论也承认了 FreeBSD 的挑战,包括有限的硬件支持(特别是对于笔记本电脑)和较小的社区。 一些人认为 Linux 的成功源于其更广泛的硬件兼容性和更务实的开发方法,而另一些人则认为 FreeBSD 对质量和稳定性的承诺使其成为特定用例(如服务器和嵌入式系统)的更优操作系统。 最终,该帖子表达了希望 FreeBSD 能够保持其独特的身份,并继续提供一个稳定、设计良好的 Linux 替代方案。
相关文章

原文

Dear FreeBSD,

I’m still the new person here, learning your ways, stumbling over the occasional quirk, smiling when I find the small touches that make you different. You remind me of what computing felt like before the noise. Before hype cycles and performance theatre. Before every tool needed a plugin system and a logo. You are coherent. You are deliberate. You are the kind of system that doesn’t have to shout to belong.

You carry the quiet strength of the greats, like a mainframe humming in a locked room, not chasing attention, just doing its work, year after year. Your base system feels like it was built by people who cared about the whole picture, not just the pieces. Your boot environments are like an old IBM i’s “side A / side B” IPL, a built-in escape hatch that says, we’ve thought ahead for you. You could be, you should be, the open-source mainframe: aligned with hardware lifecycles of three to five years or more, built for long-term trust, a platform people bet their uptime on. Your core design reminds me of Solaris in its best days: a stable base that commercial and community software could rely on without fear of shifting foundations.

And make uptime a design goal: a thousand-day uptime shouldn’t be folklore, it should be normal. Not a party trick, not a screenshot to boast about, but simply the natural consequence of a system built to endure. Mainframes never apologised for uptime measured in years, and neither should you. Apply updates without fear, reboot only when the kernel truly demands it, and let administrators see longevity as a feature, not a gamble.

I know you are reaching further into the desktop now. I understand why, and I can see how it might widen your reach. But here I find myself wondering: how do you keep the heartbeat of a rock-solid server while also embracing the quicker pulse of a modern desktop? I don’t pretend to have all the answers, I’m too new to you for that, but my first instinct is to lean on what you already have: the natural separation between CURRENT and RELEASE. Let those worlds move at their own pace, without asking one to carry the other’s compromises.

And now, with pkgbase in play, the stability of packages matters as much as the base system itself. The base must remain untouchable in its reliability, but I dream of a world where the package ecosystem is available in clear stability channels: from a rock-solid “production tier” you can stake a business on, to faster-moving streams where new features can flow without fear of breaking mission-critical systems. Too many times in the past, packages vanished or broke unexpectedly. I understand the core is sacred, but I wouldn’t mind if some of the wider ecosystem inherited that same level of care.

Culture matters too. One reason I stepped away from Linux was the noise, the debates that drowned out the joy of building. Please keep FreeBSD the kind of place where thoughtful engineering is welcome without ego battles, where enterprise focus and technical curiosity can sit at the same table. That spirit, the calm, shared purpose that carried Unix from the PDP-11 labs to the backbone of the Internet, is worth protecting.

There’s also the practical side: keep the doors open with hardware vendors like Dell and HPE, so FreeBSD remains a first-class citizen. Give me the tools to flash firmware without having to borrow Linux or Windows. Make hardware lifecycle alignment part of your story, major releases paced with the real world, point releases treated as refinement rather than disruption.

My hope is simple: that you stay different. Not in the way that shouts for attention, but in the way that earns trust. If someone wants hype or the latest shiny thing every month, they have Linux. If they want a platform that feels like it could simply run, and keep running, the way the best of Unix always did, they should know they can find it here. And I still dream of a future where a purpose-built “open-source mainframe” exists: a modern, reliable hardware system running FreeBSD with the same quiet presence as Sun’s Enterprise 10k once did.

And maybe, one day, someone will walk past a rack of servers, hear the steady, unhurried rhythm of a FreeBSD system still running, and smile, knowing that in a world that burns through trends, there is still something built to last.

With gratitude,
and with the wish to stay for the long run,
A newcomer who finally feels at home.

2025-11-25

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com