浪费每日:秘密和解获得纳税人资金
Waste Of The Day: Secret Settlements Get Taxpayer Money

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/waste-day-secret-settlements-get-taxpayer-money

马萨诸塞州审计长黛安娜·迪佐利奥最近的审计显示,2019年至2024年间,八个州机构和13所大学在处理员工申诉方面花费了680万美元。 关键的是,至少有80份和解协议包含保密条款——例如保密协议(NDA),尽管州指南禁止使用这些条款。 马萨诸塞州港务局支出最多,为170万美元,其中包括一份140万美元的和解协议(细节因NDA而保密),涉及涉嫌性别歧视。 六份保密和解协议涉及涉嫌性骚扰,两份涉及种族歧视。 审计人员发现,各机构之间没有一致的NDA使用政策,引发了人们对它们被用来掩盖不当行为的担忧,可能导致肇事者继续在职。 尽管司法总长办公室不建议使用NDA,但它们仍然被频繁使用。 迪佐利奥质疑其可执行性,引用了2013年的一项法院裁决,该裁决确立了公众有权查阅这些和解协议。 这种做法实际上利用纳税人的钱来掩盖潜在的不道德行为,而这些行为是由纳税人资助的。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Jeremy Portnoy via RealClearInvestigations,

Topline: Eight Massachusetts state agencies and 13 colleges spent $6.8 million to settle grievances, partly in secret, brought by their own employees from 2019 to 2024, according to a Jan. 16 report from State Auditor Diana DiZoglio. 

At least 80 of the 263 settlements contain confidentiality language such as a nondisclosure agreement — to keep certain details confidential between the two parties — which the audit claims is banned by state guidelines. 

Key facts: The Massachusetts Port Authority transit agency was responsible for 11 of the settlements, costing taxpayers $1.7 million. Most of the money came from a $1.4 million settlement in 2022 with an employee who alleged they were denied a promotion because of their gender. The details are sealed by an NDA.

Six of the confidential settlements involved alleged sexual harassment, and two involved alleged racial discrimination. Most of the others were about violations of collective bargaining agreements and employees who were fired without cause.

NDAs were seemingly used on an arbitrary basis. None of the colleges and state agencies included in the audit had a written policy explaining when confidentiality language should be used, except the inspector general’s office.

“By not having a documented policy on the use of confidentiality language in state employee settlement agreements, there is a risk that confidentiality language may be abused to cover up harassment; discrimination; or other inappropriate, unlawful, or unethical behaviors, potentially allowing perpetrators to continue to remain in their positions and engage in further inappropriate, unlawful, or unethical behavior,” auditor DiZoglio wrote.

All of the colleges and state agencies receive legal assistance from the state attorney general’s office. The office’s guidelines prohibit nondisclosure agreements, and the attorneys told auditors that all state agencies were made aware of the guidelines. 

DiZoglio argued that the NDAs may not even be enforceable. In June 2013, Suffolk County Superior Court sided with the Boston Globe newspaper in ruling that settlements between state agencies and their employees are public records.

Search all federal, state and local salaries and vendor spending with the world’s largest government spending database at OpenTheBooks.com

Background: The audit is a follow-up to a 2025 report that found 75 state agencies had spent $41 million on more than 2,000 employee settlements from 2010 to 2022.

Summary: Massachusetts’ NDAs hurt the public twice. They essentially use taxpayer funds to cover up potentially unethical behavior perpetrated using taxpayer funds.

The #WasteOfTheDay is brought to you by the forensic auditors at OpenTheBooks.com

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com