ARM 家庭服务器,或 Minisforum MS-R1 评测
An ARM Homelab Server, or a Minisforum MS-R1 Review

原始链接: https://sour.coffee/2026/02/20/an-arm-homelab-server-or-a-minisforum-ms-r1-review/

## Minisforum MS-R1:成功的家庭实验室ARM服务器 作者终于实现了长期以来的目标:使用Minisforum MS-R1迷你电脑,为他们的家庭实验室打造一台合理强大且价格实惠的ARM服务器。MS-R1取代了耗电量大的塔式机,并为昂贵的基于Mac的Asahi配置或性能不足的ARM系统提供了有吸引力的替代方案。 最初尝试安装Rocky Linux时,由于未检测到板载网卡而受阻,需要使用可能不稳定的驱动程序进行变通。最终,尽管作者通常更喜欢基于RHEL的服务器发行版,但由于其原生驱动程序支持,选择了Fedora。 MS-R1运行安静,并且为虚拟机管理程序提供了足够的电力,目前运行FreeBSD虚拟机作为辅助Samba域控制器。尽管该机器并非完美无缺——有限的M.2插槽可用性和不可用的Marvell网卡被指出——但作者对此感到满意。他们赞赏更广泛的ARM生态系统的进步,认为MS-R1是他们家庭实验室中值得添加的一员,特别是考虑到它的价格(559美元)以及Mac Studio等替代方案的昂贵成本。尽管存在一些早期用户的不足,但MS-R1很好地完成了它的使命。

## Minisforum MS-R1 ARM 服务器评测与讨论 最近 Hacker News 上出现了一场关于 Minisforum MS-R1 的讨论,这是一台基于 ARM 的家庭实验室服务器。用户普遍同意评测的积极评价,其中一人指出购买后不久价格大幅下降——强调了监控亚马逊价格的好处。 对话还涉及服务器的操作系统选择,由于其较短的支持周期,与 Debian、Ubuntu 或基于 RHEL 的发行版相比,Fedora 被认为不太适合。 讨论的关键点在于服务器相对较大的电源。用户推测这是一种降低成本的措施,可能重用了 x86 电源设计,并表示更喜欢更现代、更紧凑的基于 GaN 的电源解决方案或 USB-C 充电。最终,共识认为 MS-R1 的设计在尺寸/效率和成本之间做出了权衡。
相关文章

原文

I’ve always wanted an ARM server in my homelab. But earlier, I either had to use an underpowered ARM system, or use Asahi which not only requires expensive Mac hardware but also slowed down in the past few years.

Then Minisforum introduced the MS-R1 Mini PC. Two MS-01s were already incumbent in my homelab when they replaced power-hungry HPE towers, but the MS-R1 gave me what I wanted: a reasonably powerful ARM machine which doesn’t have bank-breaking Mac pricing.

Assembly

I got the MS-R1 barebones and had a 1TB SSD sitting around.

First, we have the box:

I opened the box and got this:

I installed my SSD, and attempted to install Rocky Linux.

Rocky Linux Installation

So here it is, Rocky Linux booted.

There’s one issue: the onboard NICs weren’t detected:

I installed it anyways, and tried to sideload the Realtek r8127 drivers. While they did install and load, keeping the driver upon kernel updates wasn’t elegant and very hacky.

I could keep trying, but decided to just use Fedora instead:

Fedora Installation

Yes, while I use Fedora on my laptop, I also know Fedora is generally not a good option for a server. But it had the NIC drivers as the RTL8127 is newer than RHEL 10’s freeze but not Fedora 43’s.

So that’s what I used.

Homelab Picture

Here’s my obligatory homelab picture:

MS-R1 on the top, then two MS-01s, MikroTik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC, CRS309-1G-8S+IN and CSS610-8P-2S+IN.

The Upsides

First, it’s a powerful-enough ARM system which doesn’t break the bank. I wanted this for so long. I’d say it’s quieter than the MS-01s but then Intel doesn’t exactly have the most efficient silicon. Yet even as an efficiency for performance freak I have a 285K instead of a 9950X.

While Minisforum recommends their Debian image, Rocky Linux worked for everything but the NICs, and Fedora works for everything I need. I haven’t tested the integrated GPU since I plan to use this headless. I also own a Mac as my ARM (but not main) laptop.

Say what you want about UEFI and ACPI, but it does make hardware support easier. Heck, not just Macs with UTM, but Huawei ARM laptops in China can run Windows VMs, despite crippling US sanctions.

I do hope a future CentOS/RHEL/Rocky 10 adds the Realtek 8127 so I won’t have to wait until 2028 for Rocky 11. And no I won’t use Debian.

The Downsides

By no means is the MS-R1 perfect.

For instance, there are two M.2 slots but one is used by the Wi-Fi and even if I remove it, cannot use it for a M.2 SSD, only U.2. I’d still prefer to have RAID if not for the shortage. The MS-01 and A2 have multiple M.2 SSD slots.

Also, Marvell AQC107 NICs wasn’t detected by the UEFI, so they couldn’t be used as far as I tried:

Unless the NIC died or my UEFI configuration is wrong, it’s simply not usable.

One nit: if I select “power on after outage,” it didn’t do it when I unplugged and replugged the server. Darn.

Why not Debian or Ubuntu?

While I’m aware there’s a “recommended” Debian variant for the MS-R1, I’m simply not a fan of Debian-based distros. Sure, I run my UniFi controller on Debian (inside Incus). But that’s because I have to, not because I want to.

I don’t hate Debian, I respect Debian for what they do. They do many things right, like being truly community-owned and having a reliable upgrade path (which RHEL and co notoriously lacks). But it’s not for me, despite having used it for 2.5 months before nearly a decade of FreeBSD.

Conclusion

The ARM ecosystem while growing is still small when compared to x86. Heck, I daily drive an HP OmniBook Ultra instead of a faster M3 Pro MacBook Pro because of Linux. And Asahi’s delays.

The MS-R1 isn’t perfect, but works quite well as a homelab ARM hypervisor. Do I regret it? Not at all, despite its problems. It’s early adopter problems, but I have pretty thick skin as long as my privacy isn’t invaded for profit and “AI”.

The Mac Studio is way too expensive, even used, while expected for Apple is more expensive than even already expensive current-gen HPE ProLiants. HPE is cheaper than Apple, and is already expensive as-is. ARM64 SBCs are great, but I still wanted something like a PC.

There is also one other perk: while the MSRP is $599, I got it for $559 despite a RAM shortage.

While it won’t replace my two MS-01s (too much x86 software! vPro!), it’s a nice addition and is already running my secondary Samba domain controller in a FreeBSD 15.0 virtual machine.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com