没有技巧。没有品味。
No Skill. No Taste

原始链接: https://blog.kinglycrow.com/no-skill-no-taste/

这篇文章认为,大量快速构建的应用,通常利用大型语言模型,并非降低了进入科技行业的门槛,而是*凸显*了现有的、至关重要的门槛——**品味**。作者是一位经验丰富的开发者,观察到大量缺乏创意、执行力差的项目涌入Hacker News等平台,这源于一种错觉,即任何人都可以轻松创造出有价值的东西。 核心问题不在于大型语言模型的使用本身,而在于缺乏技能*和*敏锐的品味。技能可以帮助人们克服饱和领域的挑战,而品味决定了一个想法是否能引起观众的共鸣。历史上,Hacker News更看重有趣的概念,而非技术上的完美——一个简单、时机合适的想法就能蓬勃发展。 现在,创作的简易性意味着更多的低质量项目争夺关注,造成噪音。作者以OpenClaw为例,说明即使存在技术缺陷,只要“品味”足够好,也能获得关注,这表明引人入胜的想法可以弥补不足。最终,作者认为这股浪潮会消退,因为创作者会学会优先考虑质量,并理解什么才能真正吸引观众的兴趣。

一个黑客新闻的讨论集中在过度使用生成式人工智能可能对一个人的品味和标准产生负面影响的观点上。最初的评论者认为,人工智能的“老虎机”性质——为了获得一个可接受的输出需要多次尝试——可能会让用户习惯于较低的质量,导致他们高估平庸的结果。这在利用图像生成工具的视觉艺术家中尤其明显。 一个反驳观点质疑这是否真的会降低现有的艺术标准,而另一个用户则强调“品味”在人工智能可以轻松复制创作的世界中作为区分因素的重要性日益增加。他们用一个通过与大型语言模型大量互动而高度完善的个人项目来说明这一点。 对话进一步深入到*定义*品味以及品味是否容易被复制,一位用户链接到一篇探讨该主题的文章。最终,讨论指出,在人工智能简化创作过程的同时,敏锐的品味和细致的执行力可能成为至关重要的技能。
相关文章

原文
Post title, Gartner magic quadrant show casing skill and taste and joke HN post about a todo app
Ironic image generated with nano banana to showcase my point. 


I was reading a thread on HN and I started writing this super long comment and rewriting and editing and thought, hey, if I'm doing this I clearly care enough about the state of Show HN and HN in general to write a post on it. I've written code since I was 11. I've worked on larger distributed systems, web apps, databases, search and more. I have many opinions on the transformation of our profession that is currently underway. Most of all, there is now an illusion of a lower barrier to entry. There is a magic quadrant made up of taste and skill. And too many people over estimate their taste[0] and their skill (or never care in the first place).

LLMs have people everywhere super excited they can finally build their dream applications! The only problem is, no one needs their dream application. We see it everyday now, someone posts some obvious vibe coded app which is poorly crafted and clearly derivative of an idea so thoroughly saturated it's literally leaking. This is the lowest part of the quadrant. No skill and no taste. The overall suffusion of this into the broader scene rightly has the more sensitive of us up in arms. It's noise, it's spam, it's a perversion of the years of skill we've spent accruing.


The only problem there is you might have skill, but do you have taste? This problem itself isn't new. HN of all places has always been a matter of taste. Things people found interesting made it to the front page, things they did not languished. You could build the most finely abstracted todo app of all time and your app would be dead on arrival. However, if you built something that resonated with a large enough group of people it never mattered how well built the app was or how technically complex.

 

I've seen plenty of content on HN that could not have been more than a simple crud app that rocketed to the front page. What comes to mind immediately was a little app that died if someone hadn't posted a message on it in 24 hours. Inherently simple, but quite popular. It was pure taste.

 

Taste and skill are related, the more saturated something is the higher skill you need to cross the taste threshold to make people care. It's not that there will never be another interesting todo app, it's that it has to be so tasteful as to cross our maximal standards and pre-existing expectations of them.

LLMs have exposed this more thoroughly than any other time in tech so far. The sin isn't that someone uses an LLM to generate an application[1], vibe[2] or not. The sin is they lacked enough skill and enough taste to cross the actual threshold the rest of us need to see for the work to not be slop.

An obvious and recent example of this is OpenClaw. It is a bit of a software nightmare (sorry Peter, I know you're good), but it's highly tasteful even being pretty vibey. People ate it up immediately and because there was such an interest the lack of technical soundness and security was overlooked (or begrudgingly put up with)

The lack of taste only presents a problem now, because it's so much easier for people who thought they have more taste than they actually do to post every little idea they have. This is a real problem and I think it will taper off because people will learn proper etiquette or face disappointment. It's a massive educational period for a lot of people that we've all had years to internalize.

It has the same stink of crypto on it right now that anyone can get rich. Most of them won't. This is the illusion of the lower barrier of entry, the barrier has always been taste and LLMs do nothing to remove this barrier. They amplify it.

Anyway this is all to say whether you have skill or not, you better learn to be tasteful before you decide to slop all over everyone.

[0] Taste is totally dependent on the group you're building for, discerning whether you have good taste and to whom is totally a process where you do have to put things out to people, but the bar has not now and not in my years ever been on the floor so I assert there's a minimal universal taste we all have and you should at least clear that before putting things out there.

[1] I've been writing code for 20 years, I am super experienced in my domains and I review and sand off the edges, make changes myself etc. I vibe code almost 0% of the time.

[2] Vibing means you need to have exceptional taste to cross the bar. I don't care if you do it, but you need to own the outcome.

Thanks for reading ❤️

You're pretty cool!

🕶️

If it's 👌 with you click subscribe and drop me your email 📧 and you'll get an update whenever I post something new ✨

Subscribe
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com