戴森已在英国达成庭外和解,解决有关强迫劳动问题的诉讼。
Dyson settles forced labour suit in landmark UK case

原始链接: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cddnry8dnl7o

戴森已与来自尼泊尔和孟加拉国的24名移工达成了和解,这些移工指控在马来西亚的一家为该公司供应零件的工厂遭受强迫劳动和虐待。工人们声称他们面临着现代奴隶制般的条件,包括威胁、殴打、没收护照以及长时间工作且不准休息。 虽然戴森否认责任,但和解避免了一场可能具有里程碑意义的审判。至关重要的是,此案确立了一个先例,允许针对向英国制造商供货的外国公司的指控在英国法院进行审判。 和解的具体财务细节尚未披露,戴森和工人的法律团队Leigh Day均表示,这反映了诉讼成本和解决带来的好处,*而非*承认有罪。戴森此前曾辩称此案应在马来西亚审理。此案凸显了对在马来西亚的移工待遇的持续担忧,戴森于2002年将制造业务迁至马来西亚。

黑客新闻 新 | 过去 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 招聘 | 提交 登录 戴森在英国达成里程碑式的强制劳动诉讼和解 (bbc.com) 8 分,cmsefton 发表于 37 分钟前 | 隐藏 | 过去 | 收藏 | 1 条评论 帮助 direwolf20 2 分钟前 [–] 为什么雇主拒绝员工上厕所?他们真的认为这能提高员工的生产力,还是他们就是残忍的人?回复 指南 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请 YC | 联系 搜索:
相关文章

原文

Dyson settles forced labour suit in landmark UK case

Jonathan Head,South East Asia correspondentand
Osmond Chia,Business reporter
Getty Images Dyson logo on glass storefront window with busy San Francisco downtown street reflectedGetty Images

Electronics appliance maker Dyson has agreed to settle a lawsuit filed against it by 24 migrant workers, who alleged they were subjected to forced and abusive treatment in a Malaysian factory making the firm's parts.

The workers, from Nepal and Bangladesh, sued the firm in 2022 and described being subject to what amounted to modern day slavery.

Dyson has denied any liability. When the case was brought it said it had been previously unaware of the alleged abuses, and the Malaysia supplier should be held responsible instead.

The case is significant for establishing the precedent that allegations against foreign companies supplying British manufacturers can be judged in an English court.

The workers described being threatened and beaten, having their passports withheld, and being forced to work long hours in unsanitary conditions.

According to their lawyers, from Leigh Day, they were denied toilet breaks and forced to work "upwards of 12 hours at a time without relieving themselves".

Under the terms of the settlement the details of any compensation to the workers are not being disclosed.

In separate but almost identical statements posted on their websites, Dyson and Leigh Day said the resolution was reached "in recognition of the expenses of litigation and the benefits of settlement".

They both also said the settlement was not an admission of liability on Dyson's part.

The company had earlier argued that the case should be heard in Malaysia, not Britain.

But the Supreme Court agreed that the trial could take place in an English court, setting a precedent that British companies can be held to account in the UK for actions taken by suppliers in another country.

Labour activists have for many years drawn attention to the problem of abuses of the large migrant worker population in Malaysia.

Dyson, popular for its line of premium hair dryers and home appliances, moved its manufacturing from the UK to Malaysia in 2002.

The Airwrap maker moved its headquarters to Singapore in 2019.


联系我们 contact @ memedata.com