埃弗里特市关闭 Flock 摄像头网络,此前法官裁定监控录像为公共记录。
Everett shuts down Flock camera network after judge rules footage public record

原始链接: https://www.wltx.com/article/news/nation-world/281-53d8693e-77a4-42ad-86e4-3426a30d25ae

华盛顿州埃弗雷特市已停用其68个Flock车牌识别摄像头网络,原因是法官裁定其拍摄的录像被视为公共记录。这一决定源于何塞·罗德里格斯提交的公共记录请求,旨在了解摄像头收集的数据。 尽管各城市认为发布数据可能会危及安全——可能帮助罪犯或允许类似ICE之类的实体未经授权访问——但法院不同意。担忧集中在摄像头持续录像,即使是非犯罪活动。 埃弗雷特市长卡西·富兰克林表示失望,并提到可能对虐待受害者造成伤害。与此同时,华盛顿州立法者正在辩论一项法案,以豁免Flock录像的公共披露法律,旨在解决这些安全问题。该法案已在参议院通过。如果该立法通过,埃弗雷特市将重新评估重新激活摄像头,但目前,该网络仍处于离线状态,等待在透明度和公共安全之间取得平衡的解决方案。

华盛顿州最近的一项法院裁决导致埃弗雷特市关闭了其 Flock 摄像头网络。裁决认定,车牌识别摄像头拍摄的影像被视为公共记录,任何人均可申请查阅。 这一决定在 Hacker News 上引发了讨论,用户质疑埃弗雷特市迅速移除该系统是否暗示其对先前使用情况的担忧。 几位用户还注意到初始帖子中的链接已损坏,并提供了有关该情况的有效替代文章链接——包括来自 King5、Geekwire 和 Everett Post 的报道。 更广泛的讨论表达了希望其他州也能效仿,优先保障公众获取这些监控技术收集的数据的权利。
相关文章

原文

City says safety concerns prompted pause as lawmakers debate shielding license plate data from disclosure.

EVERETT, Wash. — The City of Everett has shut down its entire network of Flock license plate reader cameras after a Snohomish County judge ruled the footage those cameras collect qualifies as a public record.

The decision came after a Washington man filed public records requests seeking access to data captured by the cameras.

Jose Rodriguez of Walla Walla, represented by attorney Tim Hall, requested the footage from multiple jurisdictions in Washington state, to see what information the automated license plate reader system was collecting.

“He started noticing that the cameras were everywhere — he wanted to see what kind of data they collect,” Hall said.

The requests revealed that Flock cameras continuously capture thousands of images, regardless of whether a vehicle is linked to a crime.

When several cities, including Everett, moved to block the request, the case went to court.

On Tuesday, a Snohomish County judge ruled that footage captured by Flock cameras qualifies as a public record under Washington law, meaning members of the public can request access to the data.

Everett Mayor Cassie Franklin said the city disagrees with the ruling and is concerned about who could obtain the footage.

“We were very disappointed,” Franklin said. “That means perpetrators of crime, people who are maybe engaged in domestic abuse or stalkers, they can request footage and that could cause a lot of harm.”

Following the ruling, Everett temporarily turned off all 68 of its Flock cameras.

At the same time, lawmakers in Olympia are debating a bill that would exempt Flock footage from public records law.

Supporters of the proposed legislation argue that public access to the data could create safety risks, including the possibility that federal immigration agents could attempt to obtain footage through public disclosure requests.

Hall pushed back on those concerns, saying public records requests are typically a lengthy process and unlikely to be useful for real-time tracking.

“As somebody who has made hundreds of public records requests myself, and represented many, many people in public records lawsuits, it’s generally a lengthy process,” Hall said. “Same would be true for ICE. They’re going to get data from where you were three months, two months ago.”

Franklin said if lawmakers pass legislation allowing cities to shield Flock data from public disclosure, Everett would consider turning the cameras back on. She said the city is not dismantling or removing the cameras in the meantime.

“Should we get a fix in Olympia that allows us to protect the data from public disclosure, then we can make the decision to turn them back on,” Franklin said.

For now, Everett’s Flock camera network remains offline, as the debate over transparency, privacy and public safety continues in the Legislature. The bill in Olympia that would put guidelines on Flock's data has passed in the Senate.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com