以色列声称袭击了伊朗核武器实验室。
Israel Claims to Strike Iranian Nuclear Weapons Lab

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/israel-claims-strike-iranian-nuclear-weapons-lab

最近的袭击,很可能由美国和以色列实施,正以伊朗的核设施为目标——包括新的和以前未受影响的地点,延续了去年开始的行动。最近的一次袭击摧毁了位于德黑兰附近的一个秘密地下设施(“敏-扎代”),该设施由伊朗核武器发展机构SPND(AMAD项目的继任者)的科学家使用。 卫星图像证实,位于莫杰代地点附近的一座新完工的工程实验室已被摧毁,该设施容纳SPND团队,且从未接受国际原子能机构的检查。这表明这是一项有针对性的努力,旨在拆除伊朗的武器化研究能力。 目前,国际原子能机构尚未发表评论,并且不太可能评估损失。虽然被摧毁的核材料的潜在影响是局部的,并且很可能是化学性质而非放射性质,但如果没有联合国监督,全面评估仍然困难。这些袭击表明,旨在阻碍伊朗核武器发展进程的努力正在重新加强。

相关文章

原文

Iran's nuclear complexes are seeing renewed attacks for both new buildings constructed since the 12-Day War, as well as long-existing infrastructure previously left alone. From what can be seen in recent satellite imagery, the U.S. and Israel are quickly finishing what they started last year.  

The IDF announced it has struck a covert underground compound outside Tehran where regime scientists were quietly designing key components for a nuclear bomb.

The target, “Min-Zadai”, was the new facility for SPND scientists after last year’s Operation Rising Lion turned their old facilities into craters.

SPND (Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research) is the Iranian Ministry of Defense’s R&D arm. It’s the successor to the AMAD Project, handling the weaponization side of nuclear power. The AMAD Project (also known as the AMAD Plan) was Iran’s highly secretive, structured nuclear weapons development program launched in the late 1990s and run directly by the Ministry of Defense. It was led by Mohsen Fakhrizadeh until its reported halt in late 2003 under international pressure.

The Institute for Science and International Security (“The Good ISIS”) used satellite imagery and a geolocated strike video to confirm a large engineering laboratory building just north of the Mojdeh site was destroyed. A brand-new building that was externally finished only in early 2025. ISIS states the complex, never visited by IAEA inspectors, has long housed multiple SPND teams quietly advancing nuclear-weapons-related R&D near Malek Ashtar University. The targeted structure was assessed as still active, which is exactly why Israel chose it.

There's no commentary provided by the IAEA yet, and based on their previous lack of discussion on the site, there likely won't be any assessment of the area by the UN organization. Without their involvement, it'll be difficult to assess if any nuclear material was destroyed in the strike. All things considered, the hazardous impact is localized if there was material on site, and is more likely to be a chemical hazard than a radiological hazard. 

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com