格雷格·克瑙斯正在迷失自我。
Greg Knauss Is Losing Himself

原始链接: https://shapeof.com/archives/2026/2/greg_knauss_is_losing_himself.html

这篇内容反思了在Claude Code等AI编码助手时代,软件开发的格局变化。作者(Acorn图像编辑器的长期开发者)承认了一种对自身目的的质疑——当AI可以快速生成功能性应用时,为何还要亲手构建? 然而,这并非害怕被取代,而是一种关注点的转变。随着流程变得更简化,*创造*的乐趣——解谜、精细构建——似乎减弱了。作者认为软件的未来不在于编码能力,而在于**个性、打磨和清晰的愿景**。 虽然任何人都可以“轻松生成”一个应用,但真正*定义*要构建什么,需要思考和自律。作者乐观地认为,专注于质量和独特体验将使Acorn脱颖而出,并且其他人可能会厌倦那些快速制作但最终肤浅的应用。归根结底,思考、计划和持续*发布*的能力仍然是宝贵的。

一篇最近的文章(链接为“Greg Knauss Is Losing Himself”)引发了 Hacker News 上关于人工智能时代编码乐趣逐渐消失的讨论。核心观点是,对于许多程序员来说,曾经是一种内在奖励的构建和解决问题的*过程*,当人工智能可以立即生成可用的代码时,价值感降低了。 一位评论者精辟地指出,这与那些享受编程“过程”的人产生了共鸣。然而,他们认为,如果一个人的动机依赖于经济回报、产品优越性或创造难度,那么人工智能的影响仅仅反映了市场需求。 该评论者建议适应市场——创造更好的产品或倡导监管变革——而不是责怪人工智能改变了格局。归根结底,如果市场不重视传统的编码过程,那是一个系统性问题,而不是人工智能的缺陷。
相关文章

原文

February 25, 2026

Greg Knauss ▸ Lose Myself:

I got into computers because solving puzzles was fun, and building worlds was fun, and making things — the process of making things — was fun, down at the granular level. It was nice to have something at the end, but the act of creation was the exciting part. I suspect that predilection will begin to disappear (in commercial environments, at the very least), now that the people who do it — who want who do it — can be replaced. The journey actually was the reward for some subset of weird little freaks, but you can now skip all that crap and just jump to the end and get on with it.

I’ve been using Claude Code quite a bit lately, not so much to replace my programming but to augment it. The new animated image export preview in Acorn 8.4.1 was a direct result of that. It was a nice little feature that I knew exactly how to do, but I hadn’t prioritized getting done yet because there were a bunch of other things on my plate. But with a little assist, it was quick to implement.

I get where Knauss is coming from, and I feel it a too. I love coding! But why bother implementing anything when anyone can make an app in an instant? I’ve been wanting to make upgrades to my online dough calculator but have been putting it off because … well, anyone can just vibe code this themself now.

But at the same time I’m not worried about being replaced by AI, or by quick free apps that have been built by AI. And in some ways I’m more hopeful than ever.

For almost 20 years now, I’ve been feeling the pressure from competing image editing apps and the potential of everything falling apart and the utter doom of my chosen profession and company. These feelings are not new to me.

So I kept on making the software that I wanted to build, that I wanted to exist in this world. And though some months or years are rougher than others, people still were willing to pay for what I’m making. And that’s kept me going, and more importantly - employed.

Lately I’ve been thinking more and more about what Acorn should be. In a time when anyone can come up with an app idea and ship with little effort, what is going to make Acorn stand out?

I’m starting to think that’s going to be personality and feel and polish, but turned up a notch. That’s what I used to do when I started writing apps, but in some ways I have really toned it down in favor of OS alignment.

Does an AI know how to do that? Does a coding assistant know that an app is really a giant collection of details?

Maybe I’ll even have fewer competitors in the long run, or at least not as many new competitors. Because at some point it’s not about how good a programmer you are (and I’ve always been a middle-tier programmer), it’s about discipline and vision.

I’ve got feelings because anyone can put an app together now, so what’s the point of me? But at the same time, I can focus on what I want to focus on and hopefully charge forward and maybe everyone else will get tired of little vibe coded apps because you still have to know exactly what you want to build. And you can’t build something you can’t think of. And I know how to think and I have ideas.

And I have discipline and I know how to ship. And in my experience, that’s what has always mattered.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com