Anthropic,请创建一个新的Slack。
Anthropic, please make a new Slack

原始链接: https://www.fivetran.com/blog/anthropic-please-make-a-new-slack

## 为Anthropic打造的新Slack的理由 作者认为,由于其限制性的数据访问政策,Slack正在阻碍人工智能在商业中的潜力。Slack已成为公司知识的中心枢纽,但要访问这些数据以供Anthropic的Claude等人工智能工具使用,却困难且效率低下,需要繁琐的复制粘贴。 当前的人工智能需要群组对话能力,而Claude专注于一对一交流,缺乏这一点。由Anthropic构建的“NewSlack”,将Claude的强大功能直接集成到协作工作流程中,可以解决这个问题。然而,成功取决于**开放的数据访问**——Slack目前缺乏并且在没有竞争压力的情况下不会提供的承诺。 作者认为Slack的网络效应被高估了,其定价也过高。将“NewSlack”与Claude访问捆绑在一起,将激励广泛采用,即使对于人工智能持怀疑态度的人也是如此,并从根本上改变企业数据格局,使其远离封闭系统。Anthropic以其原则性而闻名,使其能够独特地提供一个真正开放和可互操作的平台,最终使Slack的封闭方法难以为继。

## Anthropic 与打造更优秀的 Slack 最近一篇帖子引发了 Hacker News 的讨论,质疑 Anthropic 是否应该构建 Slack 替代品,而不是像 Matrix 或 Signal 这样的现有开源解决方案。核心问题在于 Slack 的高成本、缺乏用于 AI 集成的数据访问权限以及整体繁琐的体验。 许多评论者同意需要更好的替代方案,强调 Slack 由于网络效应而造成的“锁定”,以及复制其跨组织连接的难度。虽然 Claude(Anthropic 的 AI)在技术上*可以*构建一个聊天客户端,但人们担心 Anthropic 本身封闭的方法——缺乏与标准 LLM API 和开源工具的互操作性。 这场争论触及了开放与专有系统更广泛的问题,以及对一个不受单一实体控制的协作平台的渴望。一些人认为,AI 驱动的开发便利性正在导致解决方案,而没有考虑到潜在的需求,而另一些人则指出,自托管像 XMPP 这样的替代方案需要付出巨大的努力。最终,该帖子希望 Anthropic 在构建新的聊天平台时,能够优先考虑开放的数据访问权限。
相关文章

原文

Slack will be the Waterloo of closed data.

For companies like Fivetran that are heavy users of Slack, it replaces email and even conversation as the primary place and mode of collaboration. Questions are asked and answered, arguments are had, decisions are made, all in Slack. Our Slack message history represents nothing less than the accumulated tribal knowledge of the company. And right now, that tribal knowledge is locked inside a product with the worst data access policies in enterprise software.

We need a new Slack, and Anthropic is the right company to build it.

Claude's missing feature is group conversation

Claude has a glaring limitation: it only does 1:1 conversations. In business, work happens in groups. Today, if I want Claude's help with something that came up in a Slack thread, I have to relay the context between Slack and Claude by copy-pasting. This is absurd. I am not a sub-agent!

We need Claude and Claude Code, with their skills and plugins, with their context, to be first-class participants in our company's Slack. But this problem can't be solved by a Slack integration because of another problem: data access.

Slack's data policies are unacceptable

The most important repository of text data in many businesses lives in their Slack instances. It's the unfiltered, real-time stream of how your company actually operates. The Slack text corpus is tribal knowledge reified.

Slack's data access policy is basically "No." Slack is simultaneously the most important source of context for AI agents in business and the most restricted API in enterprise software. This is unacceptable, and there is only one thing that will change the present state of affairs: competition. 

Vendors don't provide open APIs out of the goodness of their hearts; they do it because their customers demand it, and the alternative to providing open data access is to lose those customers to competitors who do. Nothing will persuade enterprise softwares of the wisdom of an open data strategy like a vivid demonstration of this principle.

Slack is more vulnerable than you think

The conventional wisdom is that Slack is unassailable because of network effects. This is wrong. Slack's network effects are actually quite weak. The "network effect" of Slack is that you have some Slack Connect channels with a few close partners. This is valuable, but you can live without it. Claude-in-Slack would be a big enough benefit to balance out this cost.

Slack is also severely overpriced. If you're a company of any meaningful size, you will need to support legal holds in Slack, which means you need Enterprise+. Fivetran pays almost as much for Slack as we pay for G Suite, which we use for everything. This does not make sense!

NewSlack and Claude are a perfect bundle

It would be a no-brainer to buy a seat for NewSlack + Claude for every employee. Every company has a long tail of casual AI users who don't use AI enough to justify the per-seat price, but with NewSlack in the bundle, it would make sense to pay for a standard seat for every employee.

Bundling would solve another problem: every company has a faction of AI skeptics who aren't using AI. NewSlack will be the ideal environment to win over these skeptics; their human coworkers will demonstrate how to use Claude in the group chat. 

The commitment that would make it work

NewSlack needs to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past; it needs a credible commitment to open data access and interoperability with other similar systems, including competitors. Anthropic is uniquely positioned to do this because they have a demonstrated track record of standing by their principles under extraordinary pressure. Anthropic could make a public commitment to permit open data access and to interoperate with similar systems, and they would be believed.

Anthropic building a successful Slack competitor would fix the entire enterprise-data ecosystem. Slack would be Waterloo for closed data. The alternative — a world where the most important corpus of business communication is permanently locked behind a closed API — is bad for everyone.

So, Anthropic: please make a new Slack. The world needs it.

[CTA_MODULE]

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com