随着美国导弹撤离韩国,菲律宾问道:我们是下一个吗?
As US missiles leave South Korea, the Philippines asks: are we next?

原始链接: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3346226/us-missiles-leave-south-korea-philippines-asks-are-we-next

从朝鲜半岛调离爱国者导弹阵地,并伴随有关“萨德”反导系统部分也在移动的报道,并未直接影响美国在菲律宾的军事存在。但这一事件迫使马尼拉不得不提出一个它宁愿避免公开讨论的问题:如果美国的资产可以离开韩国,那么究竟是什么在将它们锚定在任何地方?分析人士表示,答案揭示了美国在亚洲联盟的本质以及盟友真正能够要求的内容。美国导弹或将移至中东韩国总统李在明周二确认,首尔已正式反对此次调动——但未能阻止。“我们已对美军为自身军事需求而调动部分防空电池表示反对,”他说。

## 美国联盟与全球战略转变 - Hacker News 讨论摘要 最近一篇来自《南华早报》(被认为亲华)的文章,关于美国可能将导弹从韩国重新部署到菲律宾,引发了 Hacker News 关于美国外交政策和全球力量动态的讨论。 核心论点集中在美国战略的转变:从冷战后的“软实力”转向更务实地关注确保商业利益和瓦解对这些利益的威胁——特别是针对“俄罗斯-中国-伊朗-委内瑞拉轴心”。一些人认为,这种重新调整优先考虑战略上一致的盟友(如菲律宾、以色列和阿联酋),而非意识形态的一致性,即使这意味着支持不太符合道德标准的政权。 然而,评论员们争论美国当前的实力,一些人认为美国已经过度扩张,除了财富创造之外,缺乏令人信服的愿景。另一些人则指出,美国持续的高额军费开支和持续的冲突,证明了美国并非仅仅处于“软实力”时期。人们担心中国和俄罗斯正在*受益*于美国目前的行动,并且削弱对手轴心的说法被夸大了。 讨论还强调了考虑信息来源的重要性,鉴于《南华早报》可能存在的偏见。
相关文章

原文

The transfer of Patriot batteries from the Korean peninsula, accompanied by reports that parts of a THAAD anti-missile system were also on the move, did not directly affect the US military presence in the Philippines.

But the episode has forced a question that Manila would rather not have to ask out loud: if America’s assets can leave South Korea, what exactly is anchoring them anywhere?

Analysts say the answer reveals much about the nature of US alliances in Asia and the limits of what treaty partners can actually demand.

South Korea may see US missiles move to Middle East

South Korea may see US missiles move to Middle East

South Korean President Lee Jae Myung confirmed on Tuesday that Seoul had formally opposed the transfer – and failed to stop it.

“We have expressed opposition to the relocation of some air defence batteries by the US forces here for their own military needs,” he said.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com