参议院共和党人关于伊朗战争结束:越快越好
Senate Republicans On Iran War Ending: Sooner The Better

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/senate-republicans-iran-war-ending-sooner-better

在2月28日美国对伊朗发动的军事打击,目标是其核计划和军事资产后,大多数共和党参议员最初支持特朗普总统的行动。然而,越来越多的参议员现在呼吁迅速结束行动。 参议员乔什·霍利(密苏里州,共和党)公开敦促总统“宣布胜利”,声称核心目标——摧毁伊朗的核能力、导弹和海军——已经实现。参议员兰德·保罗(肯塔基州,共和党)也加入了他的行列,他从一开始就反对这项行动。 其他共和党参议员,包括迈克·李(犹他州,共和党)和雪莉·摩尔·卡皮托(西弗吉尼亚州,共和党),也表达了对短期、果断行动的渴望,他们担心旷日持久的“泥潭”和潜在的政治后果。尽管共和党对此次打击的广泛支持依然存在,但这些声音反映了避免“永远战争”的偏好,这与特朗普过去的承诺相符。 这场冲突已经对全球经济产生影响,油价飙升,进一步加剧了对快速解决的压力,特别是如果霍尔木兹海峡仍然受到威胁。

相关文章

原文

The ongoing U.S. military operation against Iran, which began February 28th with strikes aimed at destroying Iran's nuclear program, ballistic missile capabilities, navy, and other strategic assets, has prompted a range of reactions from Republican senators. While most GOP lawmakers initially supported President Trump's actions - evidenced by the Senate's largely party-line vote on March 4th to block a bipartisan war powers resolution that would have curtailed or required congressional approval for the conflict - several prominent voices have emphasized the need for a swift conclusion rather than a prolonged engagement.

Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO), a key Trump ally, became one of the most vocal advocates for an early exit during his appearance on Jesse Watters Primetime on Tuesday. Hawley urged the president to "declare victory" and withdraw U.S. forces, arguing that core objectives have already been met.

Watters: Do you think the President is going to look for an off-ramp or keep going?

Hawley: I think he [Trump] has achieved his objectives the way that he’s laid them out… What is there, really, that’s left to do that we haven’t already done?

We have totally destroyed, forever, their nuclear program. We have destroyed their ballistic missiles. We have destroyed their navy. This has been a total success… I think we ought to say to our heroes, ‘Thank you for a job well done.’ This has been absolutely amazing. It’s been amazing. It’s been historic. And now it’s time to declare victory.

Watch: 

This positioned Hawley as the first prominent Trump-aligned senator to publicly push for an end in this manner. Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), known for his non-interventionist stance, has been the other GOP senator openly critical or unsupportive - opposing the operation from the outset and was the lone Republican to vote in favor of the war powers resolution to limit it.

Hawley is joined by at least two other GOP senators in expressing preferences for a short, decisive campaign rather than an extended one. In comments to ZeroHedge on Wednesday:

  • Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) stated, "Nobody wants that. The President doesn’t. I certainly don’t," emphasizing a shared desire to wrap up quickly. He expressed trust in Trump but highlighted concerns about a prolonged conflict's potential effects on the 2026 midterm elections.
  • Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), often seen as more establishment-oriented and hawkish on issues like Ukraine aid, agreed on avoiding a "quagmire." When asked about favoring a short-term operation, she replied, "Oh yeah," adding that Trump's mentioned timeline of "four to five weeks... sounds like a good period of time."

These sentiments reflect a broader GOP preference for avoiding "forever wars," consistent with Trump's campaign rhetoric, even as broader Republican support remains strong for the strikes themselves. No widespread pushback or calls for indefinite continuation appear from other senators in available reporting, though some like Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) have estimated the campaign lasting "a few weeks" with focused objectives like degrading missile capabilities.

Meanwhile, the conflict's economic ripple effects continue, with Brent crude settling above $100 per barrel for the first time since August 2022. Analysts at JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs have warned that sustained closure of the Strait of Hormuz could drive prices to $150 per barrel, heightening pressure for a rapid resolution.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com