Reddit用户揭露了Meta花费20亿美元游说年龄验证技术背后的力量。
Reddit User Uncovers Who Is Behind Meta's $2B Lobbying for Age Verification Tech

原始链接: https://www.gadgetreview.com/reddit-user-uncovers-who-is-behind-metas-2b-lobbying-for-invasive-age-verification-tech

最近的调查显示,Meta正在大力资助一项超过20亿美元的游说活动,通过众多非营利组织(如数字儿童联盟)伪装,以推动美国通过年龄验证法案。这些法案将要求苹果和谷歌在其操作系统中构建监控基础设施,允许应用程序持续验证用户年龄——本质上是创建永久数字身份。 值得注意的是,Meta自己的平台将免于这些要求,从而获得竞争优势。这种策略通过分散资金绕过了典型的选举支出透明度规定。 拟议的系统与欧盟的做法形成鲜明对比,欧盟优先使用零知识证明来进行年龄验证,以保护隐私。专家警告说,这些美国法律可能会损害设备安全,并迫使甚至注重隐私的操作系统实施侵入式身份检查,最终将Meta的利益置于用户隐私之上。

黑客新闻 新 | 过去 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 招聘 | 提交 登录 Reddit用户揭露了Meta花费20亿美元游说年龄验证技术背后的推手 (gadgetreview.com) 18点 由 doener 55分钟前 | 隐藏 | 过去 | 收藏 | 讨论 帮助 指南 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请YC | 联系方式 搜索:
相关文章

原文

A Reddit researcher just exposed how Meta funneled over $2 billion through shadowy nonprofits to push age verification laws that would force Apple and Google to build surveillance infrastructure into every device—while conveniently exempting Meta’s own platforms from the same requirements.

Following the Money Trail Through Dark Networks

Meta’s lobbying operation spans 45 states using nonprofit shells to avoid transparency requirements.

The investigation by GitHub user “upper-up” traces funding through organizations like the Digital Childhood Alliance (DCA), which launched December 18, 2024, and testified for Utah’s SB-142 just days later. Bloomberg and Deseret News reported Meta’s backing of DCA, part of a $70 million fragmented super PAC strategy designed to evade FEC tracking. Traditional election spending disclosure requirements don’t apply to this fragmented approach.

What ‘Get Age Category API’ Really Means for Your Device

Proposed laws would embed persistent identity verification directly into operating systems.

The technical reality hits harder than policy abstractions. These bills mandate OS-level APIs that apps can query for age data—creating a permanent identity layer baked into your phone’s core functions. Meta’s Horizon OS for Quest VR already implements this infrastructure through Family Center controls. Now they want Apple and Google to build similar systems that every app can access, turning age verification into persistent device fingerprinting.

The Curious Case of Platform Exemptions

Age verification bills target Meta’s competitors while leaving Meta platforms untouched.

Here’s where the lobbying gets surgical. The proposed laws hammer Apple’s App Store and Google Play with compliance requirements but reportedly spare social media platforms—Meta’s core business. It’s like Spotify lobbying for streaming regulations that only apply to Apple Music. The “child safety” rhetoric masks a competitive strategy that shifts liability from platforms to operating system makers.

Europe Shows a Different Path Forward

EU’s eIDAS 2.0 offers privacy-preserving age verification with zero-knowledge proofs that protect personal data.

The European Union’s Digital Identity Wallet takes a radically different approach. Zero-knowledge proofs let you verify age without revealing personal data—like showing you’re over 18 without disclosing your birthdate or identity details. It’s open-source, self-hostable, and only applies to large platforms while exempting FOSS and small entities. Meanwhile, US lawmakers seem ready to let Meta bamboozle them into complete privacy annihilation.

Your device’s trustworthiness hangs in the balance. These laws could force every Linux distribution and privacy-focused Android fork to implement identity verification or face legal liability. The choice between surveillance-free computing and regulatory compliance is coming faster than you think.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com