我没关系被落下,谢谢。
I'm OK being left behind, thanks

原始链接: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/03/im-ok-being-left-behind-thanks/

这篇文章反对盲目追逐新技术——例如加密货币和当前的人工智能工具——仅仅因为它们被认为是“未来”。作者抵制了利用“害怕错过”(FOMO)策略来鼓励早期采用的做法,指出真正具有革命性的技术即使你等待其成熟并证明其价值,仍然会存在。 文章强调了投资于最终可能毫无用处的技术(如早期的元宇宙开发或Flash)的风险,并强调成为早期采用者并不能保证成功。与具有个人或社会效益的情况(如疫苗试验)不同,炫耀的权利并不是值得追求的回报。 核心信息是,在投入时间和精力学习一项技术之前,等到它稳定、可靠且明确有用是完全合理的——而且通常更明智的做法。新一代人因为不从出生就了解最新的技术而不会处于劣势;实用性,而不是早期访问,才是真正重要的。

## Hacker News 讨论:接受错过科技趋势 最近 Hacker News 的讨论围绕着有意识地“落后”于新技术展开,起因于一篇名为“我很高兴被时代抛弃,谢谢”的文章。作者建议避免炒作周期,只在工具成熟后才采用。 许多评论者对此表示认同,并以 Metaverse 和早期加密货币等昙花一现的潮流为例,指出早期采用往往收益甚微,甚至带来显著风险。然而,一个主要的争论点在于当前的 AI 工具,特别是 LLM 是否有所不同。 一些人担心 LLM 可能会降低对开发者的需求,而另一些人则认为它们已经提供了显著的生产力提升。关于等待 AI 工具稳定是否明智,或者早期采用对于长期的职业相关性是否至关重要,存在着争论。 这场对话凸显了一个更广泛的困境:在不断学习新技能的压力与对工作保障和充实的工作生活平衡的渴望之间取得平衡。许多评论者强调了自我评估的重要性,以及关注个人满足感,而不是追逐最新趋势。最终,这场讨论建议采取务实的方法——单独评估技术,并在它们能够明显改善工作流程时才采用,而不是屈服于 FOMO(害怕错过)。
相关文章

原文

Many years ago, someone tried to get me into cryptocurrencies. "They're the future of money!" they said. I replied saying that I'd rather wait until they were more useful, less volatile, easier to use, and utterly reliable.

"You don't want to get left behind, do you?" They countered.

That struck me as a bizarre sentiment. What is there to be left behind from? If BitCoin (or whatever) is going to liberate us all from economic drudgery, what's the point of "getting in early"? It'll still be there tomorrow and I can join the journey whenever it is sensible for me.

Part of the crypto grift was telling people to "Have Fun Staying Poor". That weaponisation of FOMO was an insidious way to get people to drop their scepticism.

I feel the same way about the current crop of AI tools. I've tried a bunch of them. Some are good. Most are a bit shit. Few are useful to me as they are now. I'm utterly content to wait until their hype has been realised. Why should I invest in learning the equivalent of WordStar for DOS when Google Docs is coming any-day-now?

If this tech is as amazing as you say it is, I'll be able to pick it up and become productive on a timescale of my choosing not yours.

I didn't use Git when it first came out. Once it was stable and jobs began demanding it, I picked it up. Might I be 7% more effective if I'd suffered through the early years? Maybe. But so what? I could just as easily have wasted my time learning something which never took off.

I wrote my MSc on The Metaverse. Learning to built VR stuff was fun, but a complete waste of time. There was precisely zero utility in having gotten in early.

Perhaps there are some things for which it is sensible to be on the cutting edge. I took part in a vaccine trial because I thought it might personally benefit me and, hopefully, humanity.

But I'm struggling to think of anyone who has earned anything more than bragging rights by being first. Some early investors made money - but an equal and opposite number lost money. For every HTML 2.0 you might have tried, you were just as likely to have got stuck in the dead-end of Flash.

There are a 16,000 new lives being born every hour. They're all starting with a fairly blank slate. Are you genuinely saying that they'll all be left behind because they didn't learn your technology in utero?

No. That's obviously nonsense.

It is 100% OK to wait and see if something is actually useful.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com