意想不到的事情:日光浴者寿命更长
Something unexpected: Sunbathers live longer

原始链接: https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/heres-something-unexpected-sunbathers-live-longer-201606069738

一项最近的瑞典研究,追踪了近3万名女性20年,令人惊讶地发现,增加日晒与更长的寿命之间存在关联,心脏病和非癌症死亡率较低。日晒最多的女性寿命延长了最多2年,但效果并不显著。 然而,该研究也显示,日光浴者癌症诊断的发生率较高——这可能是因为整体生存时间更长,从而得以诊断,而不是日晒*导致*癌症。重要的是,这项研究表明的是一种*关联*,而非明确的因果关系证明。生活方式因素,如活动水平和饮食,也可能发挥作用。 研究人员推测,阳光照射产生的维生素D可能是带来益处的原因,但这一点尚未得到证实。该研究仅针对女性,结论不应推广。虽然这挑战了当前的避免日晒的建议,但专家警告不要放弃防晒霜,强调需要进一步研究以确定最佳日晒水平,并在皮肤癌风险与潜在健康益处之间取得平衡。

一项最新研究(链接来自health.harvard.edu)表明,日光浴者可能寿命更长,引发了Hacker News上的讨论。然而,评论员指出,除了简单的日晒之外,还有潜在的混淆因素。 该研究在瑞典女性身上进行,主要评估了*日光浴*习惯——频率、日光浴床使用情况和度假情况,而不是总体的日晒量。一位评论员指出,高日晒量与更高的收入/教育水平之间存在很强的相关性,这表明旅行(对瑞典人来说是日光浴的关键组成部分)可能是长寿的真正驱动因素,而不是太阳本身。 其他人认为维生素D的产生或休闲时间带来的压力减轻可能是原因。最后,有人强调瑞典的紫外线指数低于澳大利亚等地区,从而影响了日晒的强度。普遍的观点倾向于相关性而非因果关系,强调在解读结果时需要考虑生活方式因素以及日晒量。
相关文章

原文

Surprising, right? But that's the conclusion of a new study that compared the life spans of many people with varying amounts of sun exposure. They found that among nearly 30,000 women in Sweden, who were each monitored for about 20 years, those who spent more time in the sun actually lived longer and had less heart disease and fewer non-cancer deaths than those who reported less sun exposure.

Can the sun extend your life?

With summer just around the corner, this news is timely — and a great excuse to get out of the house or office and soak up some sun. But there are some important caveats about this research:

  • Deaths due to cancer were more common among those who spent more time in the sun (The authors suggest that the higher probability of being diagnosed with cancer among the sun worshippers was because they were surviving longer and not dying as often of other causes)
  • The impact of sun exposure on longevity was relatively small. Even those with the greatest sun exposure only benefited from an extra 7 months to 2 years of life.
  • This study detected an association between sun exposure and a lower frequency of certain causes of death; however, that's not the same as proving that sun exposure was the cause of longer life. It could turn out that there is another explanation for these results that has little to do with sun exposure itself. For example, perhaps people with more sun exposure tend to be more active, smoke less, and have healthier diets. The researchers tried to account for other factors such as these in their analysis, but it's always possible that something important was overlooked.
  • The reason why more sun exposure might prolong life or prevent heart disease deaths could not be determined by this study. Because the sun's UV light triggers chemical reactions in the skin that lead to the production of vitamin D, it's possible that vitamin D is responsible for the health benefits of sun exposure described in this study. And that could mean vitamin D supplements would promote longer life free of heart disease, even without sun exposure. However, that's only speculation and prior studies have not been able to prove this.
  • The study did not include men. The impact of sun exposure could be quite different among men.

Before you ditch the sunscreen and head for the beach…

While there is some uncertainty about the overall importance of this study, one thing is for sure: when it comes to the impact of sun exposure on health and disease, the findings of this new report won't be the last word. There are competing risks linked to sun exposure: skin cancer and other skin damage are clearly a risk; but there may be health benefits as well (as suggested by this study). Since this type of study cannot determine the exact reason that those with more sun exposure lived longer, we'll need more research to sort out just how much sun exposure is best.

The authors of this study speculate that recommendations to limit sun exposure might actually do more harm than good; in fact, they suggest that avoiding the sun could have a negative health impact similar in magnitude to smoking. That's quite a statement!

In my opinion, that kind of declaration is premature and overstates what we can conclude from this type of research. After all, there are plenty of examples in which retrospective studies like this one (that is, those that ask people to think back and self-report their experiences with an exposure or treatment) turned out to be completely wrong. Routine hormone replacement therapy for perimenopausal women is one of the most dramatic and recent examples. Let's not make sun exposure the next one.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com