Delve 据称分叉了一个开源工具并将其作为自己的产品出售。
Delve allegedly forked an open-source tool and sold it as its own

原始链接: https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/01/the-reputation-of-troubled-yc-startup-delve-has-gotten-even-worse/

合规初创公司Delve正面临来自匿名举报人“DeepDelver”的严重指控,声称该公司将一个开源工具冒充为自己的产品。DeepDelver声称Delve向他们推销了一个无代码工具“Pathways”,但实际上它是Sim.ai的“SimStudio”的修改版本,没有进行适当的署名或许可协议。 Sim.ai的首席执行官Emir Karabeg证实,Delve从未获得许可,并且之前曾试图*购买*与Sim.ai的协议——这种情况尤其尴尬,因为Sim.ai也是Delve的客户。两家公司都是Y Combinator的校友。 这些指控被认为是潜在的知识产权盗窃(尽管使用开源工具在署名的情况下是被允许的),鉴于Delve专注于合规,这尤其具有破坏性。Delve已从其网站上删除对“Pathways”的提及,并且尚未回应评论请求,这进一步加剧了审查。这场争议在网上引起了关注,人们开始质疑Insight Partners在3200万美元投资期间的尽职调查。

## Delve 指控:开源与署名 Hacker News 上出现讨论,指控 Delve 公司(近期备受关注)未经声明地复制了开源项目 “SimStudio”(Apache 2.0 许可),并将其作为自己的产品 “Pathways” 发布。虽然 Apache 许可允许使用代码,但前提是需要署名,核心问题在于 Delve 最初在被直接询问时否认了复制该项目。 评论者争论伦理与法律之间的关系,一些人认为即使法律没有强制要求,诚实和署名也至关重要。另一些人指出理解软件许可的重要性,并提到 GitHub 提供了明确的指导。 许多用户强调了讽刺之处:一家建立在可能剽窃成果上的公司,反而比原始作者取得了更大的成功。讨论还涉及开源许可的复杂性以及对计算机科学学生进行更好软件许可教育的必要性。虽然事后补救署名可能符合许可要求,但一些人认为最初的虚假陈述构成了侵权。
相关文章

原文

The controversy surrounding compliance startup Delve has gone from bad to worse this week. Among the fresh allegations from the anonymous whistleblower known as DeepDelver is the claim that Delve allegedly took an open source tool and passed it off as its own work without proper license attribution to or monetary agreement with the original developer.

The story goes that the Delve team pitched a no-code tool it called Pathways to a prospect. That prospect would later become the whistleblower DeepDelver. DeepDelver recognized that Pathways looked a lot like Sim.ai’s open source agent-building product called SimStudio and asked Delve if it was based on SimStudio. The Delve folks said they built it themselves, the whistleblower contends.

DeepDelver then presented alleged evidence that this tool was actually a fork — a modified copy — of SimStudio, changed just enough to be passed off as Delve’s own. If that proves true, it would be a violation of the Apache software license, which requires the original developer be credited.

DeepDelver calls this “stealing intellectual property,” which is a bit of a stretch, since open source tools are freely available to be used, if they are properly credited. But the irony is hard to miss: Delve, a startup that purports to sell a compliance solution, may have violated a software license.

Sim.ai’s founder and CEO, Emir Karabeg, confirmed to TechCrunch that he answered DeepDelver’s questions about the allegations. He told the whistleblower that Delve had no license agreement with Sim.ai whatsoever.

“We knew they planned to use Sim for something and later tried unsuccessfully to sell them an agreement,” Karabeg told DeepDelver. “I didn’t realize they were going to sell it out of the box as a stand-alone solution.”

Adding to the awkwardness: Sim.ai was actually a Delve customer, Karabeg told TechCrunch. Both startups were grads of the startup accelerator Y Combinator, and Y Combinator alumni frequently buy each other’s products. So while Sim.ai paid Delve, Delve did not do the same for Sim.ai.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026

Karabeg had even expressed sympathy for Delve after the whistleblower dropped the first bombshell last week. DeepDelver originally alleged that Delve was faking customer data and using rubber-stamping auditors, allegations that Delve has denied.

Since learning of the Sim.ai allegations, Karabeg has not heard from Delve’s founders. “I was consoling my friends at Delve after the first post was released last week, but since I found out about this news we haven’t been in contact,” he told TechCrunch.

Delve’s alleged methods preceded its Series A funding round led by Insight Partners, the whistleblower also alleges. We’ve reached out to Insight Partners to ask about this, and about the venerable VC firm’s due-diligence process.

We know that Insight Partners’ 2025 blog post about why it led a $32 million investment into Delve was, for a short time, unavailable on the VC firm’s website. The firm’s LinkedIn post about the investment has not been restored, at least at this time.

Mentions of the Pathways tool on Delve’s site, along with many other pages, also appear to have been scrubbed. Delve did not respond to a request for comment, and the media inquiries address on its website no longer works.

The allegations that Delve may have violated an open source license of a customer and, apparently, a friend generated so much outcry on X that it has become a trending topic, complete with a scathing community note.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com