约翰迪尔支付9900万美元的和解金,解决“维修权”诉讼。
John Deere to pay $99M in right-to-repair settlement

原始链接: https://www.thedrive.com/news/john-deere-to-pay-99-million-in-monumental-right-to-repair-settlement

## 约翰迪尔与农民就维修权达成和解 约翰迪尔在与农民就维修自身设备权利的长期斗争中达成了里程碑式的和解。尽管否认存在不当行为,但迪尔将向那些在2018年1月至今通过授权经销商支付过高维修费用的农民支付9900万美元,可能收回26-53%的成本——远高于典型和解金额。 至关重要的是,迪尔还同意在未来10年内提供独立的维修所需数字工具,从而结束了农民破解自身机械的需求。此前,迪尔在2023年发布了一份提供有限第三方访问权限的备忘录。 这场争端源于维修困难导致二手设备价格飙升,对“维修权”运动具有更广泛的影响,该运动影响着农业以外的行业,包括汽车和电器。虽然法院批准仍在等待中,但迪尔仍面临美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)关于反竞争维修行为的诉讼。这项和解代表着挑战制造商对产品售后控制权的一大步。

约翰迪尔公司已同意支付9900万美元的和解金,以解决其农业设备维修权限制问题。此前,2022年发生了一起成功破解迪尔固件的事件,凸显了其对开源许可(GPL)的合规问题。 和解协议规定,在未来10年内,迪尔公司必须向农民和独立维修店提供维护和修理所需的数字工具——这是对先前不具约束力的协议的重大改进。此前,由于限制,农民被迫破解自己的机器以使其正常运行。 尽管和解金数额巨大,但迪尔的股价*上涨*了5%,有评论员认为市场要么没有察觉到重大影响,要么预计结果会更糟。一些人认为,对于迪尔这样一家公司来说,罚款太少,不足以惩罚反竞争行为。
相关文章

原文

Farmers have been fighting John Deere for years over the right to repair their equipment, and this week, they finally reached a landmark settlement.

While the agricultural manufacturing giant pointed out in a statement that this is no admission of wrongdoing, it agreed to pay $99 million into a fund for farms and individuals who participated in a class action lawsuit. Specifically, that money is available to those involved who paid John Deere’s authorized dealers for large equipment repairs from January 2018. This means that plaintiffs will recover somewhere between 26% and 53% of overcharge damages, according to one of the court documents—far beyond the typical amount, which lands between 5% and 15%.

The settlement also includes an agreement by Deere to provide “the digital tools ​required for the maintenance, diagnosis, and repair” of tractors, combines, and other machinery for 10 years. That part is crucial, as farmers previously resorted to hacking their own equipment’s software just to get it up and running again. John Deere signed a memorandum of understanding in 2023 that partially addressed those concerns, providing third parties with the technology to diagnose and repair, as long as its intellectual property was safeguarded. Monday’s settlement seems to represent a much stronger (and legally binding) step forward.

Ripple effects of this battle have been felt far beyond the sales floors at John Deere dealers, as the price of used equipment skyrocketed in response to the infamous service difficulties. Even when the cost of older tractors doubled, farmers reasoned that they were still worth it because repairs were simpler and downtime was minimized. $60,000 for a 40-year-old machine became the norm.

A judge’s approval of the settlement is still required, though it seems likely. Still, John Deere isn’t out of the woods yet. It still faces another lawsuit from the United States Federal Trade Commission, in which the government organization accuses Deere of harmfully locking down the repair process.

It’s difficult to overstate the significance of this right-to-repair fight. While it has obvious implications for the ag industry, others like the automotive and even home appliance sectors are looking on. Any court ruling that might formally condemn John Deere of wrongdoing may set a precedent for others to follow. At a time when manufacturers want more and more control of their products after the point of sale, every little update feels incredibly high-stakes.

Got a tip or question for the author? Contact them directly: [email protected]

From running point on new car launch coverage to editing long-form features and reviews, Caleb does some of everything at The Drive. And he really, really loves trucks.


联系我们 contact @ memedata.com