那些又大又美的纽带
Those Big, Beautiful Bonds

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/those-big-beautiful-bonds

## 美国债务与迫在眉睫的危机 美国政府持续出售债务,这在很大程度上得益于美联储的干预。最近一次130亿美元的20年期国债拍卖,收益率为4.883%,凸显了一个关键的结构性问题。虽然需求*看起来*良好(投标覆盖率为2.68),但大部分债务是由外国中央银行(67.4%)购买的,更重要的是,由*被要求*购买的 первичные дилеры购买,并且美联储随时准备从他们手中购买。 这种人为需求掩盖了真正的市场需求,并使收益率人为地保持在较低水平。投资者面临两难境地:利率上升会使他们的债券贬值,而美联储拒绝干预将导致39万亿美元国债的利息支付负担过重。 最终,作者认为美联储陷入困境——要么允许不可持续的债务负担,要么通过增加货币供应量来引发通货膨胀。无论采取何种路径,债券持有人和整体经济结构都会受到损害,这使得当前的债务机制成为核心问题,而不仅仅是利率。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Robert Aro via the Mises Institute,

The U.S. Government sells debt on a revolving door basis, yet most people aren’t aware of the mechanism by which this is done. Luckily, ZeroHedge covers the debt auction results, which allows us to articulate one of the structural problems in the Federal Reserve system. As reported last week:

The week’s lone coupon auction priced at 1pm when the Treasury sold $13 BN in 20Y paper, in a solid if not stellar auction.

Deciphering the trader talk in the article, the Treasury took on an additional $13 billion in debt that is repayable in 20 years, paying an annual interest rate of 4.883% (approximately $635 million a year).

A 2.68 bid-to-cover ratio means that for every $1 of debt issued, there were $2.68 in bids, suggesting a healthy market appetite. Only so many entities can lend billions of dollars at a time; here are the three who took the auction:

  • Direct bidders (institutional money like pension funds) took 22.9%;
  • Indirect bidders (foreign central banks) took the brunt at 67.4%;
  • Primary Dealers (JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, etc.) held just 9.7%.

Since primary dealers are mandated to buy, and since the Fed will buy from them, the free-market price and demand for debt remains a mystery. Therefore, without the Fed’s anti-capitalist intervention, demand would be lower and yields would be higher.

A $13 billion debt still seems incomprehensible, so let’s assume you had $100,000 today and had to keep it in a cash equivalent for the next two decades. What would you choose? If you bought that Treasury, you’ll be earning 4.883% interest each year, and in 2046 you’ll get your principal back in full.

Whether rates go up or down, neither outcome will be pleasant, leaving you, the bondholder, caught between the Unthinkable and the Unimaginable.

The Unthinkable: Should the market demand a higher yield, or should the Fed raise rates, your 4.883% return will no longer be a good deal. If you sell, you’ll take a loss. On a societal level, for each 1% increase in rates, the interest burden on the $39 trillion debt climbs toward an additional $390 billion annually as the debt rolls over. At some point, the interest alone begins to choke the life out of the economy. If there is any consolation, maybe this fights “price inflation,” but even that’s uncertain, and prices could still skyrocket along with rates.

The Unimaginable: U.S. politicians find a way to balance the books and take on less debt… but in reality, history has shown this to be impossible. In all likelihood, the Fed will have to keep rates low and the debt spiral manageable by increasing its bond purchases and the money supply, i.e., inflation in the traditional and honest sense. In this scenario, your 4.883% bond is worth more on paper, but your currency will likely be worth a lot less.

The Fed faces an impossible task. To abstain from intervention is to allow high interest rates to compound on an unrepayable debt. To intervene is to flood the system with debased currency. Either way, the bondholder is the casualty, and the capital structure is the cost.

Feel free to sit with your 4.883% bond and wait for the Fed to make a move. In the end, it almost doesn’t matter whether rates go up or down; you’re simply watching society erode, one basis point at a time. The interest rate is the symptom; the debt mechanism is the disease.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com