Y Combinator 在 OpenAI 的股份 (0.6%)
Y Combinator's Stake in OpenAI (0.6%)

原始链接: https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/y_combinators_stake_in_openai

最近《纽约客》的一项调查对萨姆·奥特曼和 OpenAI 提出了质疑,引发了对其可信度的担忧。虽然 Y Combinator 联合创始人保罗·格雷厄姆发表评论为奥特曼辩护,但讨论中缺少一个关键细节:Y Combinator 在 OpenAI 中拥有的巨额财务股份。 最初由 Y Combinator 的一个分支 YC Research 投资,OpenAI 现在估值 8520 亿美元。消息人士透露,Y Combinator 持有 OpenAI 约 0.6% 的股份,价值超过 50 亿美元。 作者认为,这种未公开的财务利益——影响格雷厄姆及其妻子(同样是 Y Combinator 的创始人)——在评估格雷厄姆支持奥特曼的公开声明时应予以考虑。虽然这并不一定否定他的观点,但由于数十亿美元的利益相关,潜在的偏见需要透明度。核心问题不是 *格雷厄姆是否* 辩护了奥特曼,而是 *为什么* 他的观点在没有承认他与 OpenAI 成功之间存在巨大财务联系的情况下被呈现出来。

黑客新闻 新的 | 过去的 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 工作 | 提交 登录 Y Combinator 在 OpenAI 的股份 (0.6%) (daringfireball.net) 94 分,gyomu 发表于 2 小时前 | 隐藏 | 过去的 | 收藏 | 讨论 帮助 考虑申请 YC 的 2026 年夏季批次!申请截止至 5 月 4 日 指南 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请 YC | 联系 搜索:
相关文章

原文

Speaking of companies with valuable minority stakes in AI companies, there’s one thing that stuck in my craw about the blockbuster Ronan Farrow / Andrew Marantz investigative piece on Sam Altman and OpenAI last month for The New Yorker. It didn’t come up during Nilay Patel’s excellent interview with Farrow on Decoder, either.

Sam Altman was the president of Y Combinator for several years, and left to become the full-time CEO of OpenAI. The New Yorker quotes Y Combinator co-founder Paul Graham multiple times, in the context of Altman’s trustworthiness. (Some of those quotes are firsthand, others secondhand.) Graham’s role in the story — particularly his public remarks after publication — comprised an entire section in my own take on the New Yorker piece, wherein I concluded:

I would characterize Graham’s tweets re: Altman this week as emphasizing only that Altman was not fired or otherwise forced from YC, and could have stayed as CEO at YC if he’d found another CEO for OpenAI. But for all of Graham’s elucidating engagement on Twitter/X this week regarding this story, he’s dancing around the core question of the Farrow/Marantz investigation, the one right there in The New Yorker’s headline: Can Sam Altman be trusted? “We didn’t ‘remove’ Sam Altman” and “We didn’t want him to leave” are not the same things as saying, say, “I think Sam Altman is honest and trustworthy” or “Sam Altman is a man of integrity”. If Paul Graham were to say such things, clearly and unambiguously, those remarks would carry tremendous weight. But — rather conspicuously to my eyes — he’s not saying such things.

The thing that stuck in my craw is this: Does Y Combinator own a stake in OpenAI? And if they do, given OpenAI’s sky-high valuation, isn’t that stake worth billions of dollars?

OpenAI was seeded by an offshoot of Y Combinator called YC Research in 2016 — when Altman was running YC. In December 2023, the well-known AI expert (and AI-hype skeptic) Gary Marcus wrote the following, in a piece on Altman’s trustworthiness in the wake of the OpenAI board saga that saw Altman fired, re-hired, and the board purged in the course of a tumultuous week:

After poking around, I found out that “I have no equity in OpenAI” was only half the truth; while Altman to my knowledge holds no direct equity in OpenAI, he does have an indirect stake in OpenAI, and that fact should have been disclosed.

In particular, he own a stake of Y Combinator, and Y Combinator owns a stake in OpenAI. It may well be worth tens of millions of dollars; even for Altman, that’s not trivial. Since he was President of Y Combinator, and CEO of OpenAI; he surely was aware of this.

So it’s well known that Y Combinator owns some stake in OpenAI. But how big is that stake? This seems like devilishly difficult information to obtain. I asked around and a little birdie who knows several OpenAI investors came back with an answer: Y Combinator owns about 0.6 percent of OpenAI. At OpenAI’s current $852 billion valuation, that’s worth over $5 billion.

Graham and his wife Jessica Livingston are two of Y Combinator’s four founding partners. The fact that Paul Graham personally has billions of dollars at stake with OpenAI doesn’t mean that his public opinion on Sam Altman’s trustworthiness and leadership is invalid. But it certainly seems like the sort of thing that ought to be disclosed when quoting Graham as an Altman character reference. A billion dollars here, a billion there — that adds up to the sort of money that might skew a fellow’s opinion.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com