正式:犹他州是美国最接近禁止VPN的州。
It's official: Utah is the U.S. state closest to banning VPNs

原始链接: https://tech.yahoo.com/vpn/article/its-official-utah-is-the-us-state-closest-to-banning-vpns-153556814.html

犹他州新的参议院法案73号,自5月6日起生效,大幅扩展了该州的年龄验证法,可能对在线自由产生广泛影响。该法律禁止网站甚至*提及* VPN作为绕过年龄限制的方法,并要求网站对其从犹他州境内访问的任何用户进行年龄验证,无论其通过VPN显示的明显位置如何。 这给企业带来了困境:要么为所有用户实施具有侵入性的年龄验证,要么尝试阻止VPN流量——这在技术上具有挑战性,并且常常侵犯权利。虽然在威斯康星州全面禁止VPN的尝试失败了,但犹他州的法律有效地实现了类似的结果。 倡导者担心这会树立一个危险的先例,表明在线执行年龄限制法律不可避免地会导致广泛的隐私侵犯和对言论自由的限制。预计将对犹他州的法律提出法律挑战,因为它突破了在线监管的界限,并引发了第一修正案的担忧。

## 犹他州潜在的VPN限制:摘要 犹他州正在接近一项法律,该法律虽然没有完全禁止VPN,但显著限制了它们的使用,并引发了言论自由方面的担忧。该法律将于5月6日生效,受犹他州年龄验证法约束的网站将被禁止*告知*用户如何使用VPN绕过年龄限制,并且无论用户的虚拟位置如何,都将承担执行年龄验证的责任。 讨论的中心在于这项法律是否是合理地执行年龄限制的尝试,或者是否侵犯了第一修正案权利并带来了技术执行挑战。许多评论员指出合规的困难,并建议VPN提供商可能会完全阻止犹他州用户。 一个关键的争论点在于“离开”一个有不良法律的州的可行性,承认搬迁的巨大个人和经济成本。另一些人则对政府过度干预和隐私侵蚀的更广泛趋势表示担忧,这可能受到像NSA这样的机构推动。该法律的合宪性受到广泛质疑,但人们对当前最高法院做出有利裁决持怀疑态度。
相关文章

原文

When Utah's Senate Bill 73 goes into force on May 6, websites subject to the state's age verification law will be legally barred from explaining how to use a VPN to get around age restrictions. They'll also be liable for enforcing age verification for any user within Utah's physical borders — regardless of their apparent virtual location.

Although these provisions appear to just be updates to the existing age verification law, they carry more far-reaching implications. For starters, forbidding businesses from even discussing VPNs on their websites feels very much like a First Amendment violation, though we'll have to wait for the inevitable court case to know for sure.

But it’s the other provision that has online freedom advocates more worried. As you may know, a VPN can be used to change your virtual location so you appear to be getting online from somewhere else. If a website grants access to an underage Utah resident who's using a VPN to connect seemingly via another state, that website could be liable for violating the law.

Advertisement

Advertisement

This leaves impacted online businesses with two solutions — both of them bad. They could force every user to go through age verification, violating the privacy of everyone who visits the site (to say nothing of the likely impact to the site's revenue as users balk at the age gates).

Alternatively, the websites could block all VPN traffic — or try to. VPN protocols are easy to disguise as regular web traffic, so the only way to prevent their use is to block IP addresses associated with them. But VPN providers regularly add new IP addresses and start the cycle all over again.

Blocking VPN use isn't just technically difficult, either. It's considered a rights violation in most countries, and the only governments trying to do it tend to be highly restrictive of rights in general. Utah is just the farthest state along a path that's inevitable for all states with age-gate laws: The internet is amorphous enough that enforcing large-scale bans practically requires broad crackdowns on the right to privacy and free expression.

Thus far, states seem reluctant to cross the final threshold into total VPN bans. A proposal to ban all VPNs was defeated in Wisconsin due to the same concerns we discussed above. That's why the Utah law stops just short of the line. But given that it largely has the same impact, even for those outside of the state, it will be instructive to watch the lawsuits and legal challenges to the Utah legislation and similar laws — which we can count on ensuing in the weeks and months ahead.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Best VPNs in 2026 | The best VPNs for streaming in 2026 | The fastest VPNs in 2026 | Best VPN for Mac in 2026 | Most secure VPN in 2026 | 8 ways to make your VPN run faster | Does using a VPN impact internet speeds? | Are VPNs really safe? | See Yahoo Tech’s full VPN coverage

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com