稳定币提案仍然“不足以”保护银行存款:美国银行表示
Stablecoin Proposal Still 'Falls Short' Of Protecting Bank Deposits: US Banks Say

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/crypto/stablecoin-proposal-still-falls-short-protecting-bank-deposits-us-banks-say

美国主要银行集团对《CLARITY法案》的现有措辞表示不满,该法案旨在监管稳定币。虽然他们承认禁止稳定币收益以保护银行存款的意图,但他们认为拟议文本包含一个“重大漏洞”,允许加密平台在传统监管之外提供类似银行的利息。 银行家担心高稳定币收益可能会引发银行体系数万亿美元的资金外流,尤其会影响社区银行并减少整体贷款。他们引用了支持这一说法的研究。然而,白宫经济学家预测影响要小得多——银行贷款将增加21亿美元。 参议员蒂利斯是该法案的关键发起人,他为该法案辩护,称其为一种妥协方案,允许加密平台提供超越简单余额收益的奖励。这场争论已经使该法案的进展停滞不前,引发了人们对它可能无法在2026年中期选举前通过的担忧。银行集团计划提交详细的建议,以加强该法案的措辞。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Brayden Lindrea via CoinTelegraph,.com,

America’s largest banking groups said they remain dissatisfied with the CLARITY Act’s newly proposed language on stablecoin yield, arguing that it fails to protect bank deposits.

In a statement Monday, the bankers acknowledged that US Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks are “seeking to achieve the correct policy goal” in prohibiting stablecoin yield but noted that the CLARITY Act’s “proposed language” currently “falls short of that goal.”

“It is imperative that Congress get this right,” the American Bankers Association said in a joint statement with the Bank Policy Institute, Consumer Bankers Association, Financial Services Forum and Independent Community Bankers of America.

The dispute between bankers and the crypto industry over stablecoin yield has stalled the bipartisan bill, which passed the House of Representatives in July by a 294-134 vote.

There are concerns that the CLARITY Act may not pass before the US midterm elections in November 2026, which could further hinder its progress.

Banking groups have previously cited studies suggesting that widespread stablecoin adoption could lead to trillions in outflows from the US banking system, particularly from community banks, which may not have enough balance-sheet flexibility to absorb these outflows without resorting to higher-cost wholesale borrowing. 

In the Monday statement, the bankers also cited an article by Stanford-trained economist Andrew Nigrinis to argue that stablecoin yields driving bank deposit outflows “could reduce all consumer, small-business, and farm loans by one-fifth or more, making it essential for the prohibition to be clear and transparent.”

However, White House economists reported in April that banning stablecoin yield may increase bank lending by only $2.1 billion, a marginal net increase of about 0.02%. 

The bankers contested the language of Section 404, arguing that it allows crypto platforms to pay users bank-like interest or yield outside traditional rules. 

Extract of the “SEC 404. Prohibiting interest and yield on payment stablecoins” document. Source: Alex Thorn

“This is a significant loophole that must be addressed,” the bankers said, adding that they will be sharing “detailed suggestions for strengthening the proposed language with lawmakers in the coming days.”

However, Tillis said the current text of the CLARITY Act strikes a compromise by prohibiting stablecoin rewards on idle balances while allowing crypto platforms to “offer other forms of customer rewards.”

“Most importantly, it helps put us on a bipartisan path to pass the CLARITY Act, providing the regulatory certainty needed to foster innovation. Some in the banking industry may not want either of these things to happen, and we respectfully agree to disagree.”

The current text of the CLARITY Act was made public on Friday, with Coinbase and other members of the crypto industry pushing for a Senate markup next week.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com