自由软件基金会欧洲分部再次就苹果公司案件向欧盟法院提起干预。
FSFE intervenes against Apple before EUCJ for the second time

原始链接: https://fsfe.org/news/2026/news-20260519-01.en.html

欧洲联盟法院(CJEU)已批准欧洲自由软件基金会(FSFE)作为第三方介入 T-359/25 案,即“苹果诉欧盟委员会案”。这场法律纠纷的核心在于苹果公司对欧盟委员会的一项指令提出质疑,该指令要求苹果根据《数字市场法案》(DMA)为其设备提供硬件和软件的互操作性。 欧盟委员会的这一决定旨在提高透明度并改善开发者访问权限,确保他们能够将其应用程序与苹果的操作系统进行整合。FSFE 此次介入是为了支持委员会,旨在捍卫软件自由,并防止“守门人”公司将竞争对手拒之门外。 法院承认,该裁决将对自由及开源软件的发展产生重大影响,特别是在开发者将其工具连接到苹果生态系统的能力方面。这是 FSFE 第二次针对苹果参与与 DMA 相关的法律干预。通过参与此案,FSFE 旨在确保民间社会的利益得到体现,倡导以对开发者友好的方式执行《数字市场法案》,从而防止市场垄断,并为用户和创作者保留开放的互联性。

Hacker News 最新 | 往日 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 招聘 | 提交 登录 FSFE 第二次就苹果公司相关事宜向欧盟法院提出干预 (fsfe.org) 6 分,M95D 发布于 25 分钟前 | 隐藏 | 往日 | 收藏 | 讨论 | 帮助 指南 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请 YC | 联系 搜索:
相关文章

原文

News

on:

The Free Software Foundation Europe has been granted permission to intervene at the Court of Justice of the European Union in the case T-359/25 - Apple against the European Commission. This second intervention aims to defend interoperability and Software Freedom in Europe.

FSFE Press Release picture

In May 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) approved the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE)’s request to intervene in the case Apple v. European Commission (T-359/25) in support of the European Commission.

This case concerns Apple’s obligations under Article 6(7) of the DMA. Apple is challenging the European Commission’s decision that lays down procedures on how the company must provide software and hardware interoperability for its smartphone and tablets. The Commission’s decision includes measures intended to improve transparency and access for developers seeking interoperability with Apple’s operating system features, hardware features including access to technical information, communication channels, and clearer procedures for interoperability requests.

“This case is one of the major judicial tests of the EU’s interoperability obligations under the DMA. This law aims at preventing large technology companies from unfairly locking out competitors. The FSFE seeks to enforce the DMA in a Free Software developer friendly way”,

says Lucas Lasota, FSFE's Legal Proramme Manager.

In its order allowing the FSFE to intervene, the court explicitly recognised that the outcome of the case is “likely to have a significant impact on the supply of Free and Open Source Software” and on the ability of developers to connect their applications with Apple’s operating systems. The Court further acknowledged that limiting interoperability obligations could prevent Free Software developers and users from being able to “interconnect their applications with Apple’s operating system”.

“With industry interests well represented by several interveners on the other side, FSFE is there to ensure that civil society is equally heard — and that the court can decide with the full picture before it"

says Dr. Martin Husovec, the lawyer representing FSFE in the court.

A new case for interoperability

This is the second time the FSFE is intervening in a litigation at the CJEU in regards to the DMA and Apple. The previous case (T-1080/23) concerns Apple’s broader challenge to its DMA obligations and its designation as gatekeeper, while this case (T-359/25) focuses specifically on interoperability under Article 6(7) DMA and the legality of the European Commission’s decision specifying how Apple must implement those obligations in practice.

As a next step, the FSFE will prepare and submit its statement in intervention before the Court, further presenting its arguments on interoperability, Software Freedom, and the practical impact of the DMA on developers and users.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com