他举报了DOGE,随后刹车被割断。
He Blew the Whistle on DOGE. Then His Brakes Were Cut

原始链接: https://www.wired.com/story/he-blew-the-whistle-on-doge-then-his-brakes-were-cut/

2025年4月,美国国家劳工关系委员会(NLRB)的信息技术员工丹·伯鲁利斯(Dan Berulis)提交了一份举报投诉,称由埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)监管的政府效率部(DOGE)在处理机构数据时存在违规行为,可能导致数据泄露至与俄罗斯相关的IP地址。 在通过美国国家公共电台(NPR)公开披露此事后,伯鲁利斯开始遭到严重的恐吓,包括收到一封附有无人机拍摄其本人照片的威胁信。在马斯克于X平台上公开将伯鲁利斯的指控定性为“严重犯罪”并煽动网络敌意及对其进行起诉的呼声后,事态进一步升级。 在马斯克的帖文发布后不久,伯鲁利斯遭遇了一场车祸,起因是其车辆的刹车线被人为切断。目前,伯鲁利斯已对马斯克提起诽谤诉讼,指控这位亿万富翁的公开言论使其成为暴力攻击和骚扰的目标。诉讼指出,马斯克的行为直接危及了伯鲁利斯的安全,并将网络煽动与其车辆遭受的人为破坏直接联系起来。伯鲁利斯仍对自身安全感到恐惧,并质疑攻击者是如何追踪到其住所及日常行踪的。

这篇 Hacker News 帖子讨论了《连线》(Wired)杂志的一篇报道,该报道详细描述了针对一名与政府效率部(DOGE)有关的举报人所进行的所谓蓄意破坏。 报道称,该举报人的车辆刹车线被人切断,气囊碰撞传感器也通过一种专业级的精密接线方式被绕过,旨在防止车辆触发安全警报或进入“跛行模式”。据称,该举报人还收到了一张威胁字条,并附有无人机拍摄的他本人的照片。 评论者们正在讨论该事件的可信度。怀疑论者认为,刹车失灵对大多数驾驶者来说会立即显现,并建议需要视觉证据(如切断处的清晰照片)来证实这一说法。另一些人则反驳称,据报道的气囊传感器被篡改一事显示出的技术水平,表明这更像是一起恶意的专业行为,而非简单的事故或车主自导自演。讨论还涉及了此类指控的更广泛影响,一些用户指出,举报人所针对的目标与汽车行业有着高层联系,这一巧合令人不安。
相关文章

原文

On April 14, 2025, Dan Berulis, an IT staffer at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), filed a Congressional whistleblower complaint with an extraordinary and urgent claim: The so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had seemingly compromised the agency’s data and appeared to be exfiltrating it out of the NLRB entirely. Additionally, Berulis claimed that mere minutes after DOGE members had accessed the agency’s data, there appeared to be login attempts from an IP address in Russia.

At the time, DOGE teams, orchestrated by billionaire Elon Musk, were sweeping across government, firing federal workers and accessing sensitive data and technical systems with no oversight and little transparency.

The following day, Berulis went public in an NPR article with his name and claims. In it, he claimed that in the lead-up to his Congressional disclosure, a threatening note had been taped to his door, including photos of him walking his dog that appeared to have been taken by a drone. Berulis was already scared that speaking out had made him a target.

In a new defamation lawsuit, filed by Berulis in a DC court on April 17 and made public this week, Berulis alleges that Musk himself made him a target of further violence by falsely stating that Berulis’ whistleblower claim against DOGE was fake. The complaint was initially filed under seal because Berulis maintains a security clearance that requires prepublication review of anything related to his work with the government.

Five days after the NPR story went live, on Easter Sunday, April 20, 2025, Berulis got in his car to drive to Maryland to make a last-minute visit to his uncle, opting to take local roads instead of the major highway nearby. Within about five minutes of leaving his house, Berulis realized something was wrong. As he approached a stop sign at an intersection, his car wouldn’t slow down. He ran off the road and into the sign. When he examined his car, he found something that terrified him: His brake lines had been cut.

Unbeknownst to Berulis at the time, the night before, on April 19, at 8:06 pm, Musk had reshared an X post from right-wing influencer Mario Nawfal, claiming that DOGE had been “cleared” and that people were asking the Department of Justice to investigate Berulis. Musk shared Nawfal’s post, writing, “Filing a deliberately false whistleblower claim is a serious crime.” The story had originally been circulated by @amuse, an account that has regularly shared misleading claims and misinformation and is followed by influential people like Musk and Department of Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The @amuse post included Berulis’ name and photograph.

According to a police report viewed by WIRED, when a police officer from Prince William County arrived at the scene, Berulis’ lawyer from Whistleblower Aid, Andrew Bakaj, who had helped Berulis file his Congressional complaint about DOGE, was also on the scene.

Berulis, who found out about Musk’s tweet after the accident, thought back to the threatening note that had been posted on his door earlier that month.

According to the suit, Musk’s “readers drew the implication” that Berulis had committed a serious crime, “as reflected in replies demanding prosecution, jail, harm, or arrest,” and this put him at “increased risk of physical harm.” In the replies to the post, which remains online, several users called for Berulis to be prosecuted. One user wrote, “Snitches get stitches.”

“The correlation was obvious to me, with the timing,” he says. Berulis also began to worry about how exactly whoever had been threatening him knew where he lived.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com