我为何给素不相识的人发邮件
Why I email complete strangers

原始链接: https://www.goodinternetmagazine.com/why-i-email-complete-strangers/

给陌生人发电子邮件可能会让人感到不安,甚至产生一种“我不够好”的自我怀疑。然而,正如作家扎卡里·凯(Zachary Kai)所言,电子邮件是一种持久且深思熟虑的交流媒介,与社交媒体转瞬即逝的本质相比,它提供了一种令人耳目一新的选择。与那些基于算法的平台不同,电子邮件允许“人际时间”般的沟通——这是一种让思想得以沉淀、让真实而有意义的联系得以建立的空间。 为了克服对这种“真空”状态的恐惧,凯建议将电子邮件视为通往好奇心的桥梁,而非一种打扰。通过明确表达意图、尊重对方的时间,并不带商业目的,你可以与作家、艺术家和思想者建立起真实的关系。 其核心信息很简单:不要让对沉默的恐惧阻碍了你的行动。虽然并不是每个人都会回复,但开启有意义对话的潜力远大于被忽视的风险。怀揣真诚与得体去接触他人,你可以将冰冷的收件箱变成社区和灵感的源泉。在这个即时且碎片化的沟通世界里,对于追求深度的人而言,电子邮件依然是一项至关重要的工具。拥抱这份脆弱,精心撰写你的信息,然后点击发送。

这篇 Hacker News 帖子探讨了给陌生人(特别是创作者、博主和开发者)发送“冷邮件”的积极影响。 参与者一致认为,真诚且非功利性的留言非常难得,也深受感激。对于那些被负面评论或垃圾信息困扰的创作者来说,一封充满关怀的感谢信就像是“一股清流”。评论者分享了这些互动如何促成了有意义的指导关系、技术合作以及个人成长。 然而,讨论也提到了常见的障碍,例如担心被误认为是推销员、社交焦虑,以及因为对方日程繁忙或垃圾邮件过滤机制而极易被忽略。 总之,大家的共识是,发送一封友善、真诚的邮件是一种低风险、高回报的习惯。虽然许多收件人可能会因社交焦虑而不知如何回复,但大多数人仍会将这些信息视为一份令人惊喜的礼物。这篇帖子提醒我们,通过主动联系——不为利益,只为真诚的交流——来守护互联网的人文一面。
相关文章

原文

The first time I emailed a stranger, I swear my cursor hovered over Send for a full five minutes.

I had plenty of justifiable reasons to remain hesitant. Not wanting to take up their time, feeling bothersome, worried my question was a silly one... A hundred disparate excuses leading back to the same core: "I’m not enough." That’s the forever curse of low self-esteem. The best and worst-case scenario can never occur, because you’ve rejected yourself first. Who knows how the other is going to respond?

That’s where the rub is, isn’t it? The terrifying unknown.

Yet, despite all the odds, I’ve moved through that suffocating fear. And you can do the same too. Allow me to explain.

Email is old. More established than the smartphone, the hyperlink, and even the beloved internet.

While Tim Berners-Lee was still only theorizing on what would later become the World Wide Web, programmers were already sending each other emails. Ray Tomlinson sent the first email from one computer to another in 1971, choosing the @ symbol to separate the sender from the host machine.

That was 54 years ago. And a few hours previous, as I write this in 2025? I continued what he started.

Email is an oft-cited example for demonstrating Lindy’s law: a theory positing that something’s future life expectancy is in proportion to its current age. The longer something lasts, the longer it’ll continue.

Social media platforms rise and fall like ancient empires sped up a thousand times. Yet email endures. Like the postal service or the printed book. Is it any coincidence these technologies remain my great loves? They share a quality I struggle to name. Perhaps it’s permanence in an ephemeral world. You can tuck a letter in a drawer, discovering it decades later. A book can outlive its author by centuries. One can archive, search, and treasure an email. They’re all vessels that honor my beloved words.

And in their longevity is their flexibility. You can read a book anywhere, anytime. You can send a letter to the farthest-flung corners of the earth imaginable. And you can email anyone.

Whoever you are, wherever you are, however you send and receive your emails, it’s there for you. And if you ever leave, you can take it all with you. Or change it over. Can the same be said for anything on a social media platform? Perhaps not. An email can be spam, sure, just as a letter can be junk, or a book unenjoyable.

The other thing I love about this communication method is it can be intentional, meaningful, hope-filled, and considerate. Or just kind. You can make a small difference with each one you send. Just like a smile.

I’ve been thinking about why it continues to feel special. Even though it’s an integral part of our age of instant everything, the way we treat it doesn’t have to operate on perpetual now’s terms.

You can choose to engage with it in human time, and so can the recipient: compose when you have something to say, respond when you have space to think.

This breathing room creates something rare: conversations that deepen rather than scatter. Unlike the terror-inducing typing indicators and read receipts of instant messaging, email lets thoughts linger. You can draft, reconsider, refine. It’s communication that honors people’s rhythms.

Over the past year, I’ve sent countless emails to writers, developers, bloggers, artists, thinkers, and poetic web folks. Not all replied — and why should I expect them to? — but so many did.

I’ve never experienced the slow death that is the commercial or corporate inbox, but for the first time in my life, I don’t dread my inbox. I look forward to opening it.

Each connection, no matter how fleeting, started with a simple email.

So, why do we hesitate?

There’s something vulnerable about sending missives out into the void, not knowing if you’ll be welcomed or ignored. We’ve been conditioned to think of unsolicited contact as unwelcome.

While much of it is…there’s a difference between spam and genuine effort.

There’s something to be said for respecting the other person’s time and attention.

Approaching someone when you’ve engaged with their work, when you have something specific and meaningful to share or ask…you’re not being intrusive. You’re being human.

The worst thing that can happen? They don’t reply. And it’s not that bad.

Their silence says nothing about your worth. They might be busy, taking a break from email, or not in a place where they can engage with new folk…who knows? And what does it matter?

Wait. Is that you asking for guidelines on navigating this hobby? (Even if you weren’t, I’m going to continue, because I still think you’ll find at least one thing useful!)

Here’s a list. Not rules, per se, but principles. Or mistakes I’ve made you’ll never have to.

  • Don’t contact someone unless you’d want to consider them a friend.
  • If they have a place on the web, wander through it. See who they are, what makes them tick, any interests you have in common. Be specific. This shows you paid attention and you care.
  • Make it about them as much as it is about you. When interacting with folks in-person, being considered a "wonderful conversationalist" and a "fascinating person to talk to" often means you ask the most thoughtful questions, listen well, and latch onto the small details. Do so online, too.
  • Be brief, but don’t let brevity become bluntness. It’s a difficult balance to strike (if you’ve read my emails, you’ll know what I mean) but worth it. Don’t be like Blaise Pascal, who upon signing off a letter in the late 1600s, wrote: "I have made this longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter."
  • Don’t ask for anything (with caveats). Answers to relevant questions? Sure! An RSS feed link if they don’t have one? Great idea! An 88x31 button? Even better. Trading things? Why not? Still, I’d err on the side of avoiding anything professional or commercial, unless they welcome it. Do it for the love of it and expect nothing. You never know what might happen.
  • Patience and grace have always been underdeveloped yet needed attributes in any person. If you can embody those values, folks may say nothing, but they’ll appreciate it.
  • Subject lines matter more than you think. Skip the generic. Give them a reason to open it.

And while that’s all fine, how do you go about finding folks to email? Let me offer several suggestions, current at the time of writing:

  • My inbox, [email protected], is always open if you’d like an easy first attempt! (Upon writing this, I realize this entire article might come across as a complex way to source more interesting folks to converse with… but oh well! So be it.)
  • Derek Sivers, a fascinating person (and the main reason I have a website, go read Issue 1 if you’d like that story) has an open inbox if you’d like to introduce yourself.
  • The Indieweb and 32-Bit Café have links abundant to countless folks who enjoy making things online (and enjoy being contacted).
  • Manu Moreale runs an interview series called People & Blogs where he interviews folks who write on their site. Many have a public email for a reason!
  • Be deliberate on your internet wanderings and see who you stumble across.

If you’re coming at this from the whirlwind that’s social media, don’t fret. Things are different, and it’ll take some getting used to, but that isn’t a bad thing.

What I didn’t expect when I started this practice: email feels different. Richer. Perhaps because they begin with intention rather than an algorithm. You chose each other, not because a platform suggested it, but because something resonated. These connections exist in a space we control.

Ava of Ava’s Blog published a post called "some things to (un)learn," where she discusses the norms social media places on us and how engaging with the poetic web has different expectations.

To my surprise and delight (part of which prompted this article), she addressed email: "Email is not old, outdated and too formal here, and you can write like you’d write a message. While people on social media felt overwhelmed and annoyed by DMs, people love receiving email here. You’re not annoying them."

I still get nervous before emailing new folks! Even after 168 (as of the time of writing) tries. Forever hesitating, that voice asking, "who are you to bother this person with your thoughts?"

And yet. The largest joys often start with the smallest gestures. In a networked but still disconnected world, being deliberate in your search for friends is ever more necessary.

We need more human connection, thoughtful conversation, and genuine curiosity.

Will email save us? No, and neither will it solve all our problems. But it’s there. Why not use it?

Find someone whose work moves you. Ask a question you want answered. Press send.

The worst that can happen? Silence.

The best that can happen? Everything.


Zachary Kai is a queer writer and generalist who crafts science fiction about resilient souls among stars in between making zines and collecting skills. Australian-born, he writes with American spelling and British punctuation: a linguistic wanderer. The internet is his livelihood and lifeline, and he documents his existence at zacharykai.net.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com