旧金山法官驳回了 xAI 对 OpenAI 的商业秘密诉讼。
San Francisco Judge Dismisses xAI Trade Secret Lawsuit Against OpenAI

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/san-francisco-judge-dismisses-xai-trade-secret-lawsuit-against-openai

一名联邦法官驳回了埃隆·马斯克旗下 xAI 公司针对 OpenAI 提起的商业机密诉讼,并裁定不得再次起诉,该案件宣告终结。美国地方法院法官丽塔·林(Rita Lin)裁定,xAI 未能证明 OpenAI 在与前 xAI 工程师李学晨(音译)进行招聘洽谈时不正当地获取了专有信息。 法院认定,询问求职者过去的工作经验属于行业常规做法,其本身并不构成窃取商业机密。xAI 曾指控 OpenAI 盗用了其“Grok”聊天机器人系统的相关细节,但法院认为这些指控缺乏证据,并指出李学晨最终并未入职 OpenAI。 此次驳回对马斯克而言是一次重大的法律挫折。就在一个月前,陪审团刚刚驳回了他针对 OpenAI 及首席执行官山姆·奥特曼(Sam Altman)提起的另一项价值 1500 亿美元的诉讼,该诉讼指控 OpenAI 背离了公司最初的非营利使命。由于法院裁定该案件为“不得再次起诉”(dismissed with prejudice),这意味着马斯克未来将无法就同样的指控再次提起诉讼。xAI 和 OpenAI 双方均未对此裁决发表评论。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Kimberley Hayek via The Epoch Times,

A federal judge dismissed a trade secret lawsuit filed by Elon Musk’s xAI against OpenAI, ruling that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the competing artificial intelligence company improperly obtained confidential information.

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin issued the order Monday in San Francisco, dismissing the case with prejudice, resulting in xAI being unable to refile an amended version of the complaint based on the same arguments.

Lin found that xAI did not make clear that OpenAI led former senior engineer Xuechen Li to reveal trade secrets or that OpenAI engineers had knowledge.

The claims were based on Li’s departure from xAI and related discussions during his recruitment with OpenAI.

The judge noted that requesting a job candidate’s prior work experience is standard practice during the recruitment phase and that one ⁠could not infer that that itself constituted an improper solicitation of confidential material.

“To hold otherwise would potentially expose employers to liability any time they inquire about a candidate’s past work,” Lin wrote.

The lawsuit, first brought in September 2025, alleged that OpenAI misappropriated trade secrets tied to chatbot development, such as source code and other proprietary details linked to xAI’s Grok system.

An earlier version of the complaint was dismissed in February 2026, with the amended filing centering primarily on a presentation Li gave about his prior Grok-related work.

OpenAI has maintained that Li never ended up working for the company and never provided it with any xAI trade secrets. In papers favoring the dismissal of the case, OpenAI’s lawyers criticized xAI, stating, “OpenAI does not need or want anyone’s trade secrets, especially not from xAI, which is failing in the marketplace and hemorrhaging talent.”

xAI and OpenAI did not immediately return a request for comment.

xAI has also brought a separate action against Li, who has denied any impropriety.

The court’s decision curtails xAI’s ability to pursue claims over recruitment discussions and the engineer’s presentation detailing his previous experience. Due to the decision being made with prejudice, any future efforts to pursue similar allegations centering on the same facts would run into procedural blocks.

The dismissal marks Musk’s second legal loss involving OpenAI in roughly a month.

On May 18, a jury threw out a separate $150 billion lawsuit in which Musk, who co-founded OpenAI alongside Altman and others in 2015, alleged that OpenAI and Altman, its chief executive, abandoned the company’s original nonprofit mission.

During the trial, Altman countered that he had never promised to keep OpenAI a nonprofit forever.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers concurred with the jury’s decision at the time.

“There’s a substantial amount of evidence to support the jury’s finding, which is why I was prepared to dismiss on the spot,” she said.

After leaving OpenAI, Musk started his own AI project, xAI, which is a direct competitor with OpenAI and other players in the field.

 

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com