《金融时报》炒作MSCI对SpaceX给出的糟糕ESG评级,但实际上根本没人关心。
Financial Times Hypes SpaceX's Dismal ESG Rating By MSCI, But Really Nobody Cares

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/financial-times-hypes-spacexs-dismal-esg-rating-msci-really-nobody-cares

《金融时报》近期报道,明晟公司(MSCI)将太空探索技术公司(SpaceX)的ESG评级定为“CCC”——即最低等级,并将此评级与俄罗斯的评分进行类比,引发了争议。 然而,文中指出这一事件进一步证明了ESG运动存在系统性失败。批评者认为,明晟公司的评分模型存在根本性缺陷。他们指出,将一家创新的美国航空航天公司评为最低等级,同时却给大型石油和国防企业给予高评级,这是荒谬的。 埃隆·马斯克长期以来一直公开批评这些评估框架。他曾著名地指出,埃克森美孚获得高ESG评分而特斯拉却被排除在外,这种做法极其虚伪。对于马斯克和其他怀疑论者而言,这一事件强化了他们的观点:ESG指标是一场“骗局”,被意识形态议程所利用,而非衡量企业健康状况或社会责任的准确指标。归根结底,这篇文章认为,整个ESG模式已经丧失了公信力,并疏远了那些相比企业道德标榜更看重常识的人群。

相关文章

原文

The Financial Times appears eager to frame MSCI's decision to assign SpaceX the "lowest possible ESG rating" as a major reputational blow. However, the real story is that the entire ESG movement on Wall Street has imploded, and anyone grounded in reality and common sense has increasingly viewed the whole woke era as counterproductive.

"The triple C assessment means SpaceX has the same score as that awarded to the Russian state on MSCI's ESG government rating scale in the wake of its 2022 invasion of Ukraine," FT journalist Ramsay Hodgson wrote. 

This same ESG ratings regime gives triple-A ratings to oil majors and major defense companies, while giving one of America's most important rocket and space companies a bottom-tier grade. That only suggests there are major flaws in the ESG scoring model.

Here are the publicly visible MSCI ESG ratings: 

Oil/Gas

Defense

"Exxon is rated top ten best in world for environment, social & governance (ESG) by S&P 500, while Tesla didn't make the list!" Musk wrote on X several years ago. 

Musk is right... 

Here's what X users are saying:

Musk added, "ESG is a scam. It has been weaponized by phone social justice warriors."

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com