正在考虑将更多的流量通过英国境外的节点进行路由。
Pondering routing more of my traffic via nodes outside the UK

原始链接: https://neilzone.co.uk/2026/06/pondering-routing-more-of-my-traffic-via-nodes-outside-the-uk-because-of-the-direction-of-uk-online-safety-policy/

在这篇文章中,尼尔·布朗(Neil Brown)对英国政府近期在互联网监管方面的政策表达了深切担忧,他认为那些以“在线安全”为名推出的举措,正威胁到隐私权和言论自由等基本权利。 布朗特别批评了针对社交媒体提出的年龄验证强制要求,警告称这将导致普遍的身份检查,并迫使国际网站为规避合规负担而屏蔽来自英国的流量。他强调了目前互联网服务提供商(ISP)层面DNS屏蔽趋势的加剧,以及《在线安全法案》下通过法院强制令进行封锁的可能性。 布朗认为这些事态发展愈发带有反乌托邦色彩,并透露他正考虑将网络流量路由至英国境外的服务器,以绕过国内的审查。他感叹道,在上网 30 年后,为了维持对网络的开放访问,他竟被迫采取此类措施。他认为当前的监管轨迹是对数字自由的一场重大且令人不安的侵蚀。

一篇 Hacker News 的讨论反映出用户对英国《在线安全法案》(OSA)日益增长的焦虑。许多参与者对政府的数字监管方式表示失望,认为这与其说是为了保护儿童,不如说是迈向大规模监控和削弱网络匿名性的举措。 讨论主要集中在以下几个核心主题: * **规避手段:** 用户正在讨论各种技术解决方案,例如使用海外 VPN、WireGuard 节点或代理服务器来绕过国内的内容限制和审查。 * **对有效性的质疑:** 许多人认为这些措施只是一场“猫鼠游戏”。他们担心,如果 VPN 的使用变得普遍,政府最终将彻底封禁隐私工具,或强制实施深度包检测。 * **“狂野西部”时代的终结:** 参与者感慨互联网已从一个去中心化、具有弹性的前沿地带,演变成一个由大企业和国家影响力所主导的受控环境。 * **政治不信任:** 参与者对通过联系议员或签署请愿书等常规民主渠道的无效性感到沮丧。讨论中还存在更广泛的争议,即政府是否正以“安全”为借口来加强对公共舆论的控制并强制推行身份验证。
相关文章

原文

Published on: by Neil Brown

Some of the UK government’s policy announcements around the Internet - and, in particular, social media and VPNs - are downright concerning me at the moment.

In the name of “online safety”, the fundamental rights of both freedom of expression and privacy appear to be under imminent threat.

I have concerns which go beyond our shores - mostly stemming from Google, frankly - but the UK legislative / policy issues are bothering me especially at the moment.

I value my ability to read, learn, and communicate almost without borders. I don’t like signing up to websites or newsletters (I prefer RSS), I don’t like storing my data on other people’s computers, and I’ve certainly no wish to prove my age or identity outside core government services.

The current proposal to ban people under 16 - who also have the rights to freedom of expression and privacy - from some (as yet not fully delineated) social media services is likely to result in wide-spread verification.

While I am unlikely to be affected directly - although it would depend on the definition of “social media” - I anticipate that more websites will simply choose to block traffic from UK IP addresses, especially if UK-originated traffic does not matter a huge amount to them.

I am already seeing this as a consequence of the Online Safety Act, and I expect any future UK laws in this area to exacerbate that.

I also anticipate that we will soon see the first court-ordered blocking injunctions under the Online Safety Act, when the fines issued by Ofcom against some website providers (so far, most quite niche porn sites, as far as I can tell, plus a “suicide discussion forum”) go unpaid and the “compliance issues” which Ofcom has identified go unresolved.

Some - many - UK ISPs have already implemented, and carry out, DNS blocking, both for mandatory and non-mandatory reasons. Mine - A&A - is probably one of the outliers, with no blocking save for the mandatory sanctions-related requirements.

In any case, so far, since I run my own recursive DNS infrastructure, I have not been affected.

I use Tor quite a lot, but I’ve seen an increase - sure, a small increase, but an increase nevertheless - of sites which are blocking Tor traffic.

And so, for the first time, I am considering locating something (perhaps a WireGuard node, or a SOCKS proxy, or a recursive DNS server / DNS proxy, or perhaps all of them) somewhere on the Internet outside the UK, so that I can route some traffic through that, as needed, to maintain my access to the web.

Honestly, it seems such a shame to me, that UK Internet censorship should reach such a place, but there we go.

I have not decided exactly what I might do, or exactly how, or where, I might do it, but it is far more attractive to me now that it has been ever before, in all the 30ish years that I’ve been online.

To me, the need to even contemplate this kind of thing is the stuff of dystopian sci-fi.

And yet here I find myself.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com