奥巴马任命的联邦法官阻止了特朗普要求投票需提供公民身份证明的行政令。
Obama-Appointed Federal Judge Blocks Trump's EO Requiring Proof Of Citizenship To Vote

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/obama-appointed-federal-judge-blocks-trumps-eo-requiring-proof-citizenship-vote

美国联邦地区法官丹尼斯·卡斯珀(Denise Casper)已永久禁止特朗普行政令中旨在彻底改革联邦选举程序的多项关键条款。裁决认定,总统试图绕过国会并侵犯各州对选举拥有的主要权力,已超出了其宪法授权范围。 该行政令试图强制要求选民登记时提供美国公民身份证明,禁止计入逾期送达的邮寄选票,并扣留违规州的联邦资金。卡斯珀法官裁定,行政当局缺乏实施这些变更的法律依据,并指出该命令所引用的普遍存在的选举舞弊缺乏证据支持。此外,法院还发现该政策有剥夺数千名选民投票权的风险。 这一裁决标志着该行政当局在选举相关举措上遭遇了重大的法律挫折,此类举措在法庭上一直面临挑战。尽管屡遭挫败,特朗普总统仍继续敦促国会通过立法落实公民身份证明要求,并于近期表示,他将利用无关的住房法案来强行推动陷入停滞的《拯救美国法案》(SAVE America Act)获得通过。

相关文章

原文

Via American Greatness,

A federal judge on Wednesday permanently blocked key portions of President Donald Trump’s executive order overhauling federal election procedures, ruling that the president exceeded his constitutional authority by attempting to impose new voting requirements without congressional approval.

U.S. District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, concluded that the Constitution gives primary authority over elections to the states and Congress, not the executive branch.

The ruling makes permanent a preliminary injunction Casper issued last year in a lawsuit filed by Democratic attorneys general from 19 states.

“While the Constitution vests the President with ‘executive Power’ and commands him to ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,’ it does not grant the President any specific powers over elections,” Casper wrote.

“As a result, the President ‘plays no direct role in the process of appointing electors,’ nor does he have authority to control the state officials who do,” she added.

Trump’s executive order sought to require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, prohibit states from counting mail ballots received after Election Day even if postmarked on time, and withhold certain federal funds from states that declined to comply.

Casper ruled that the administration lacked the authority to impose those changes through executive action.

In her 59-page opinion, the judge also rejected the administration’s justification for the order, writing that the Justice Department failed to establish the widespread election problems it cited in defending the policy.

“There is no evidence in this record of widespread ‘illegal voting, discrimination, fraud, and other forms of malfeasance and error’ within American elections, which the Executive Order purports to safeguard against,” Casper wrote.

The judge also concluded that the order would have disenfranchised thousands of voters.

The decision is another legal setback for the administration’s efforts to repair federal election procedures. Courts have repeatedly blocked or limited several election-related initiatives advanced during Trump’s second term.

Additional lawsuits are challenging a separate executive order aimed at creating a nationwide voter database and tightening mail voting requirements. Earlier this week, another federal judge blocked the administration’s attempt to use an immigration database to verify voter rolls, while courts have also rejected Justice Department efforts to obtain state voter registration records.

Despite the court rulings, Trump has continued urging Congress to enact proof-of-citizenship requirements through legislation.

The Republican-backed SAVE America Act passed the House but remains stalled in the Senate.

Trump renewed that effort Wednesday, saying he would withhold his signature from a bipartisan housing bill until Congress approves voter citizenship verification requirements.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com