AI童书,身体恐怖版
AI children's books, body horror edition

原始链接: https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/ai-childrens-books-body-horror-edition

作者探讨了亚马逊畅销书榜单上充斥着劣质人工智能生成儿童百科全书的令人担忧的现象。这些书籍以盈利为目的,利用了购买者(成人)与阅读者(儿童)之间的信息差,同时规避了知识产权侵权的风险。 尽管市场对人工智能的高级功能大肆炒作,但作者购买了一本排名靠前的百科全书进行质量测试。结果令人不安:书中充斥着噩梦般、毫无逻辑且超现实的插图,从变异生物到扭曲、令人不安的风景,完全不适合儿童成长。 作者认为,虽然人工智能模型最终可能会变得更先进,但当前的产出存在严重缺陷,甚至具有潜在危害。由于这些书籍通过操纵排名和评论涌入市场,它们正在不知不觉中以语无伦次和怪诞的意象塑造着年轻一代的心智。这篇文章发出了严厉的警告:将快速、由人工智能驱动的内容生产置于人工质量控制之上,是在辜负下一代。

最近的一场 Hacker News 讨论揭示了一个令人不安的趋势:低质量的 AI 生成儿童读物泛滥,用户因其超现实且结构紊乱的画面将其戏称为“身体恐怖”。 评论者指出,这些书籍中常出现下颚扭曲等令人不安的插图,对家庭来说往往成了无意间的笑料。尽管有人认为这些书很可能是由利用“按需打印”服务的低成本微型品牌所制作,但也有人对这些产品缺乏基本的质量控制和校对表示不满。舆论的共识反映了对充斥市场的 AI 生成内容(被一名用户轻蔑地称为“垃圾内容”)的广泛批评,即这类内容为了追求数量和速度,往往牺牲了编辑标准或艺术连贯性。
相关文章

原文

Last week, I posted a visual demonstration of the sameness of AI-generated content. This makes the output easy to spot even if all the individual pieces are perfect facsimiles of what a human could create:

In the article, I collated a list of about 220 AI-generated children’s books, but I deliberately sidestepped the question of quality. These conversations almost never lead anywhere; the rebuttal is always that the next model will be better than the last. So, I tried to make a simpler point: the books are all the same. You lose more than you might be expecting if you let an LLM be your voice.

But as a parent, curiosity eventually got the better of me, so I purchased one of these Amazon bestsellers. And before we dive in, I think that children’s encyclopedias are targeted with such ferocity for three reasons:

  1. They probably sell well. I’d wager that most children in the developed world get one at some point in their lives.

  2. The buyer is not the reader. The books are judged by the cover and purchased as gifts by relatives or family friends.

  3. In contrast to fiction, the “authors” can undercut traditional publishers without the risk of infringing on any closely-guarded intellectual property.

Of course, these encyclopedias shape the minds of young children, so we ought to set a high bar. Luckily, I’m told that frontier models have surpassed PhD-level intelligence in the summer of 2025. Most of the books in question were published mid-2026 and the artwork points to a flagship model from a major US-based lab. So, in all likelihood, there’s nothing to worry a—

Oh…

Oh.

Well, hoot!

Of course, good horror is more than just jump scares. Sometimes, it’s catching the glimpse of a reflection that’s reaching out to you:

Or maybe, it’s waking up on a planet you don’t recognize. You plead and beg and scream but no one will believe:

And hey — isn’t there something off about your cat?

You watch helplessly as beasts and trees fuse into a malevolent, pulsating mass:

The vines twist around your ankles; a raspy, disembodied voice keeps whispering unsettling words into your ear:

For the record, all of these photos come from the #1 category bestseller on Amazon (link):

Rankings and reviews can be faked, but if you browse the relevant product categories, this stuff is everywhere. I’m sure the exposure translates into real sales:

So, there you have it. Yep, it’s entirely possible that the models of tomorrow will be able to generate flawless children’s encyclopedias. But until then, we’re messing up some kids.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com