英国能教给我们什么关于“民主社会主义”的知识
What England Can Teach Us About 'Democratic Socialism'

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/what-england-can-teach-us-about-democratic-socialism

在这篇评论中,斯蒂芬·摩尔(Stephen Moore)认为英国为美国敲响了警钟,警示其需提防社会主义的危害。摩尔指出,像安迪·伯纳姆(Andy Burnham)这样主张加强国家对公用事业和交通运输管控的领导人若崛起,预示着二战后英国失败政策的回归。 摩尔断言,英国此前在关键行业国有化方面的实验导致了经济停滞、失业率上升以及全球影响力的下降,而这一趋势唯有通过玛格丽特·撒切尔(Margaret Thatcher)的私有化和减税改革才得以扭转。他警告称,美国目前正出现类似的转变,决策者试图推翻里根和特朗普时期的去监管化及其带来的经济成就。 尽管摩尔承认,公众对通货膨胀和“负担能力危机”的沮丧情绪正推动人们支持由国家提供服务,但他坚称,这些问题源于政府权力过度扩张、大规模印钞以及新冠疫情期间的停工,而非市场失灵。最终,他总结道,社会主义会扼杀繁荣,并敦促美国人抵制这一政治趋势,以保护国家的经济活力。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Stephen Moore via The Epoch Times,

If you want to see modern-day socialism in action, look no further than to the other side of the pond at not-so-jolly old England. The story of Britain’s decline is a warning signal to those here in the States who are thrilled by the warm embrace of socialism.

Right now, the Brits are having the same debate about the merits of socialism as we are in our major cities and blue states. In England, the Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the Labour Party is out. But instead of turning to the right, it appears the UK will swerve further to the collective ownership of the left. Andy Burnham—the former socialist mayor of Manchester—is next in line. God save the queen.

As Greg Ip of The Wall Street Journal reports, “Burnham’s socialism is the real deal. He wants the state to control more of the means of production. ... (H)e advocates public ownership of water, housing, energy and transportation.”

Burnham calls it “business-friendly socialism.”

Sure.

That will make the trains run on time.

What short memories.

After World War II, the Brits experimented with creeping socialism for more than three decades. The Labour Party handed over to public bureaucrats and unions the means of production: the Bank of England, the coal mines, the airlines, iron, steel, and phone service, to name a few. Prices soared, nothing worked, unemployment lines lengthened, and the Brits got a lot poorer.

Britain’s share of world output fell by half, from more than 10 percent to less than 5 percent. About the only thing Britain had going for it was four lads from Liverpool called the Beatles, who singlehandedly brought deep pride back and caused a mini-stimulus. But in the 1970s, the downturn worsened.

We interrupt this story with the election of Margaret Thatcher in 1979. She saved the kingdom by slashing taxes and privatizing everything she could get her hands on. It was the precursor to Reaganomics.

That didn’t last long. Now it’s Thatcherism in reverse—just as the left in America wants to reverse the Reagan and Trump legacies of deregulation, lower taxes, and sound money.

What seems to be driving this leap toward “democratic socialism” on both sides of the Atlantic is a middle-class fury over inflation. The idea of free food, housing, child care, and health care is alluring.

But prices have risen not because of a failure of capitalism. It was mostly caused by massive money printing, widespread shutdowns of private industry, retail businesses and schools, and stay-at-home orders during COVID-19. Government became the provider, and the leap forward in state expenditures was never entirely extinguished.

In both the United States and in England, the “affordability crisis” is mostly in government-owned, government-operated, or heavily regulated businesses. In the U.S., that’s health care, education, and college tuition. In Britain, it’s those industries plus energy, housing, and child care.

There is an infestation of socialism in Britain that has sucked the dynamic and wealth-producing spirit out of the UK.

We need a socialism vaccine in America.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com