研究发现:举重在控制血糖方面优于跑步
Weightlifting beats running for blood sugar control, researchers find (2025)

原始链接: https://news.vt.edu/articles/2025/11/research_fralinbiomed_yanweightlifting.html

弗吉尼亚理工大学弗拉林生物医学研究所的一项最新研究表明,尽管跑步和举重都能改善代谢健康,但抗阻训练在对抗肥胖和糖尿病方面可能更为有效。 研究人员利用一种模拟渐进式举重的新型小鼠模型,对比了抗阻运动与自主跑轮运动对高脂饮食小鼠的生理影响。虽然两种运动方式都能改善血糖调节和胰岛素信号传导,但举重在减少内脏脂肪和皮下脂肪、改善整体葡萄糖耐量方面的效果优于跑步。值得注意的是,这些代谢益处是在不增加肌肉量的情况下实现的,这表明抗阻训练激活了独特的生理路径。 首席研究员严震(Zhen Yan)强调,对于难以进行耐力运动的人群来说,这些发现尤为令人振奋。尽管研究指出结合有氧运动和抗阻训练对健康最理想,但它同时也凸显了举重作为一种管理糖尿病和肥胖的强大且易于实施的手段。研究人员最后指出,运动所提供的全面健康益处是药物减肥干预无法完全复制的。

弗吉尼亚理工大学最近的一项研究表明,举重在控制血糖方面可能优于有氧运动,该研究认为肌肉就像一个“葡萄糖库”,可以从血液中汲取糖分。 然而,Hacker News 上的讨论强调了几个注意事项: * **研究局限性:** 这项研究是以小鼠为对象进行的,批评者指出,“举重”组是在进食前进行锻炼,而耐力组则不然。用户还质疑为什么此类研究不在人体上进行,并指出学术界因成本和便利性等原因往往偏好啮齿动物模型。 * **生物学背景:** 参与讨论者指出,人类在进化上独特地适应了耐力运动,举重可能并不像一些人假设的那样能有效提高静息代谢率。 * **实用建议:** 许多用户提倡“自我实验”。参与者建议使用持续葡萄糖监测仪 (CGM) 来追踪个人对饮食和运动的反应。其他人则强调,最有效的运动是个人觉得足够有趣并能作为长期习惯坚持下去的运动。 总之,虽然该研究支持阻力训练对代谢健康的生理益处,但评论者敦促读者应优先考虑可持续的生活方式选择,而非追随基于小鼠研究的健身潮流。
相关文章

原文

Running may help burn calories, but when it comes to preventing diabetes and obesity, pumping iron might have the edge, according to preclinical findings from Virginia Tech scientists at the Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC.

The research, published Oct. 30 in the Journal of Sport and Health Science, compared the effects of endurance and resistance exercise in mice fed a high-fat diet, a widely used model of obesity, hyperglycemia, and Type 2 diabetes.

A team led by exercise medicine researcher Zhen Yan found that while both running and weightlifting helped the body clear excess sugar from the blood, resistance training was more effective in reducing subcutaneous and visceral fat, improving glucose tolerance, and lowering insulin resistance — key factors in preventing and managing diabetes.

“We all want to live a long, healthy life,” said Yan, professor and director of the institute’s Center for Exercise Medicine Research. “We all know the benefits of regular exercise. There is plenty of evidence in humans that both endurance exercise, such as running, and resistance exercise, such as weightlifting, are effective in promoting insulin sensitivity.” 

But while both support metabolic function, a rigorous side-by-side comparison was lacking. Is one type of exercise better than the other? 

What they did

To conduct the first direct, controlled comparison, members of the research team built something that had not previously existed: a mouse model of weightlifting.

In this model, mice lived in specially designed cages where food was accessed through a hinged, weighted lid. To eat, the mice had to lift the lid while wearing a small shoulder collar, causing a squat-like movement that engaged the muscle contractions people use during resistance exercise. The load was gradually increased over several days, mimicking progressive strength training.

For the endurance group, mice were given open access to a running wheel, an established model of aerobic exercise. Control groups included sedentary mice on either a normal or high-fat diet.

Over eight weeks, the researchers monitored weight gain, body composition, and fat distribution. They tested exercise capacity with treadmill runs, assessed heart and muscle function, and measured how well the mice regulated blood sugar. They also analyzed skeletal muscle tissue to study insulin signaling at the molecular level.

Using their novel model of resistance exercise, team members were able to directly compare how the two training styles affect obesity, blood glucose, and insulin sensitivity in a way that closely mirrors human exercise.

“Our data showed that both running and weightlifting reduce fat in the abdomen and under the skin and improve blood glucose maintenance with better insulin signaling in skeletal muscle,” Yan said. “Importantly, weightlifting outperforms running in these health benefits.”

Why this matters

Diabetes and obesity are major public health challenges, fueled by sedentary lifestyles and high-fat diets. The findings underscore decades of clinical trials that show endurance, resistance, and high-intensity interval training all reduce HbA1c—a key measure of long-term blood sugar control — while also lowering body mass index, blood pressure, and improving quality of life.

The new Virginia Tech study, which also involves collaborators from the University of Virginia, helps fill a critical gap by directly comparing voluntary running and weightlifting in a controlled, preclinical model of diet-induced obesity.

“The findings also bring good news for people who, for any number of reasons, cannot engage in endurance-type exercise,” Yan said. “Weight training has equal, if not better, anti-diabetes benefits.”

The researchers also saw changes in skeletal muscle signaling pathways that could inform new drug therapies for Type 2 diabetes.

Interestingly, the benefits of resistance training were not explained by changes in muscle mass or exercise performance, suggesting unique metabolic mechanisms at play.

Yan said the study underscores the idea that, while popular drug interventions like GLP-1 agonists can help with diabetes management and weight loss, they do not replace the unique, accessible, and comprehensive benefits of a well-balanced exercise program. 

“The take-home message is that you should do both endurance and resistance exercise, if possible, to get the most health benefit,” said Yan, who is also a professor in the Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at Virginia Tech. 

This research was supported by the grants from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health and the Red Gates Foundation.

Original study: doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101100

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com