为什么人工智能公司的标志看起来都像肛门?
Why do AI company logos look like buttholes? (2025)

原始链接: https://velvetshark.com/ai-company-logos-that-look-like-buttholes

人工智能公司的品牌塑造呈现出一种显著趋势:偏好使用带有中心空洞、充满渐变效果的圆形图标。虽然 OpenAI 等公司用华丽的商业辞藻来描述这些“花朵”状的图形,但批评者和网民指出,它们与肛门有着惊人且无法忽视的相似之处。 这种视觉上的同质化源于多种因素,包括圆形在心理学上的吸引力、“跟随者效应”带来的模仿,以及追求安全、无害美学的委员会式设计流程。归根结底,这一趋势反映了科技行业内心深处的不安;尽管标榜“颠覆性”,但人工智能公司在压力下不得不遵循既定的视觉模板,以显得合法且值得信赖。 正如科技品牌曾经历过光泽 3D 设计和扁平化设计的时代,“肛门时代”代表了行业内又一波同质化浪潮。虽然这些标志有效地传达了一种熟悉、无威胁的形象,但也凸显了它们在创意冒险方面的缺失。为了实现真正的创新,未来的人工智能品牌应考虑更具辨识度、更大胆的视觉形象,摆脱当前的圆形陈词滥调,并避免那些虽具讽刺意味却非本意的生理特征联想。

最近 Hacker News 上的一场讨论探讨了一个充满调侃意味的问题:“为什么 AI 公司的 Logo 看起来都像屁眼?” 这场讨论凸显了一种普遍的看法,即现代 AI 品牌形象往往采用圆形、类似光圈的形状和单色方案,在视觉上无意间产生了一种令人尴尬且“无法忽视”的解剖学联想。 评论者们针对这一设计趋势提出了各种愤世嫉俗或技术层面的理论。有人认为这些 Logo 象征着信息涌现的“光圈”,也有人将其与 AI 生成内容(即“垃圾内容”)的“劣化”(enshittification)联系起来。批评者指出 OpenAI 对其 Logo “精确与结构”的宏大解释,与其实际的几何形状形成了讽刺的对比。还有人开玩笑说,这些 Logo 反映了创始人的个性,或者是当前行业状况的“通用符号”。归根结底,这篇讨论是对企业品牌设计的幽默评论:一旦产生了这种联想,就很难再以其他方式看待这些 Logo 了。
相关文章

原文

If you pay attention to AI company branding, you'll notice a pattern:

  1. Circular shape (often with a gradient)
  2. Central opening or focal point
  3. Radiating elements from the center
  4. Soft, organic curves

Sound familiar? It should, because it's also an apt description of... well, you know.

A butthole.

The circular AI logo epidemic

If you ever thought that AI company logos look like buttholes, you're not alone.

FastCompany noticed this trend in 2023 and published an article about it, but (I could only presume) their editors and lawyers didn't let them title the article the way the wanted it to title, so it got published with a more safe for work title: The AI boom is creating a new logo trend: the swirling hexagon. They also were careful not to mention anything anatomical.

I don't have editors or lawyers, so let's take a closer look at some examples:

OpenAI's logo evolution

OpenAI's original logo was a simple, text-based mark. Then came the redesign: a perfect circle with a subtle gradient and central void.

OpenAI's official explanation is a masterclass in corporate euphemism:

"The Blossom logo is more than just a visual symbol; it represents the core philosophy that guides our approach to design and innovation. At its heart, the logo captures the dynamic intersection between humanity and technology—two forces that shape our world and inspire our work. The design embodies the fluidity and warmth of human-centered thinking through the use of circles, while right angles introduce the precision and structure that technology demands."

Sure, Sam.

Translation: "We made a circular shape with some angles because it looked nice, then wrote flowery language to justify why our butthole-adjacent design is actually profound."

The fluidity and warmth of human-centered thinking through the use of circles is perhaps the most elegant way anyone has ever described making a logo that resembles an anus.

The Big AI companies

Looking at the logos of the Big AI companies, you can see that they almost all of them have a circular or snowflake-like shape and a central opening.

Only DeepSeek and Midjourney don't follow the trend. Interestingly, both are sea-related.

Smoking gun: Anthropic's Claude

Up until this point, the logos have been subtle. You might say that the logos are simply circular and there's not much more to it.

But Anthropic's Claude takes it to the next level.

Here's a side-by-side comparison with a drawing from Kurt Vonnegut's book "Breakfast of Champions". I added Claude's logo below for easy comparison.

Both the drawing and the description in the book are unambiguous. This is not just "a circular shape with a gradient" anymore, is it?

It's not just AI companies

Even traditional companies aren't immune. Here are a few notable or funny examples. But the percentage of AI company logos that look like buttholes is still significantly higher than than any other industry.

I especially like the Electrolux one. It's simple, memorable, and once you see a butt and bikini, you can't unsee it.

Why does this keep happening?

There are several factors at play:

Circular design psychology

Circles represent wholeness, completion, and infinity—concepts that align with AI's promise. They're also friendly and non-threatening, qualities companies desperately want to project when selling potentially job-replacing technology.

Unintentional biomimicry

The human brain finds familiar patterns in random shapes (pareidolia), like a face on Mars, taken by the Viking 1 orbiter and released by NASA in 1976.

But sometimes, designers inadvertently recreate biological forms without realizing the... anatomical implications.

The copycat effect

Once a few major players adopted the circular sphincter aesthetic, everyone followed suit. Now we have an industry where standing out means looking exactly like everyone else's butthole.

Basically, the same reason why so many brands change their logos and look like everyone else.

Design by committee

Another factor is how these logos are created. Important corporate decisions involve many stakeholders. The result is often the safest, most inoffensive option, the average of everyone's opinions. In design meetings at AI companies, conversations probably sound like:

  • Can we make it more futuristic?
  • It needs to feel advanced but approachable.
  • Let's add a subtle gradient to convey intelligence.

No single person suggests making a logo that resembles an anus, but when everyone's feedback gets incorporated, that's what often emerges. Risk aversion in corporate environments naturally pushes designs toward familiar, "safe" territory, which apparently means anatomical openings.

What this says about tech branding

This phenomenon reveals something deeper about the tech industry: the fear of standing out too much. Despite claims of innovation and disruption, there's tremendous pressure to look legitimate by conforming to established visual language.

When OpenAI's sphincter-like logo became successful, it created a template that said, "This is what serious AI looks like." Now, any new AI company that doesn't resemble a colorful anatomical opening risks being seen as unserious or unprofessional.

Tech design trends through history

This isn't the first time tech design has gone through a conformity phase. Consider these previous waves:

  • 1990s-2000s: 3D and Glossy - Remember when every logo needed a drop shadow and a glassy shine? Apple's aqua interface set the standard.
  • 2010-2013: Skeuomorphism - Digital designs mimicking physical objects, with stitched leather textures and realistic dials.
  • 2013-2018: Flat Design - Reaction to skeuomorphism brought minimal, clean interfaces with bright colors and no shadows.
  • 2018-2022: Neomorphism - Soft shadows and semi-flat design creating subtle, "touchable" interfaces.
  • 2022-Present: The Butthole Era - Circular gradients with central focal points dominating AI branding.

Each era started with innovations that were quickly copied until the industry reached saturation point and moved on to the next trend.

Logos become increasingly interchangeable (one of the bags is real, but they all look the same)

Historic logo disasters: You're not alone

AI companies can take some comfort in knowing they're not the first to face unintended anatomical comparisons. Logo history is filled with disasters but to keep this consistent with the theme of the article, here's a couple of them.

  • Zune logo, when flipped, says something different. Maybe that's one of the reasons why iPod won?
  • Brazilian Institute of Oriental Studies is a stylized pagoda silhouetted against the setting sun. Or so the designers wanted it to look. The final result was much more... anatomical. They since changed it to something less suggestive.

Maybe companies should have a panel of "middle schoolers" on their payroll to review logos before launch. They'll find every possible inappropriate interpretation with ruthless efficiency.

Breaking free from the butthole

For companies brave enough to differentiate, here are some alternatives:

  1. Embrace sharp angles - geometric shapes with defined edges create a distinct visual identity
  2. Use negative space creatively - think FedEx arrow, not biological openings
  3. Avoid radial symmetry - not everything needs to be perfectly circular
  4. Skip the gradient - flat design still works
  5. Test with diverse audiences - if five different people independently say "that looks like a butthole," it probably does (show it to teenagers if you want to uncover even the most subtle anatomical implications)

Conclusion

Does this mean AI companies should change their branding? Not necessarily. The familiarity clearly works in building trust. But perhaps the next wave of AI innovation could be accompanied by some visual innovation too.

For companies looking to break the mold, consider these approaches that successful tech brands have used:

  • Embrace meaningful abstraction - Slack's hashtag-inspired logo communicates collaboration without circular clichés
  • Leverage letterforms - Netflix's simple "N" has become instantly recognizable without anatomical confusion
  • Tell a story - Stripe's distinctive parallel lines reflect payment flows moving seamlessly
  • Use distinctive color combinations - Twitch's purple branding stands out in a sea of blue tech logos

The challenge for the next generation of AI companies isn't just technological - it's finding visual language that communicates innovation without resorting to the same tired sphincter-inspired patterns.

PS. This post is meant to be humorous, but let's not pretend there isn't a serious point here about the depressing sameness in modern design. No actual anuses were consulted during this research, though several designers were clearly thinking about them.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com