数百万纳税人的钱也没能阻止芝加哥治安恶劣地区的七家 Save A Lot 超市关门。
Taxpayer Millions Couldn't Stop Seven Save A Lot Grocery Stores From Going Dark In Crime-Ridden Chicago

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/taxpayer-millions-couldnt-stop-seven-save-lot-grocery-stores-going-dark-crime-ridden

Save A Lot 关闭了芝加哥南部和西部的七家杂货店,成为该市近期又一批撤离的零售店。尽管作为一项2600万美元重建计划的一部分,这些由 Yellow Banana 运营的门店获得了超过1300万美元的纳税人补贴以缓解“食品沙漠”问题,但它们最终未能实现盈利。 虽然该公司将其归因于普遍的财务压力和 SNAP(食品券)福利的削减,但此次关闭遵循了沃尔玛、奥乐齐(Aldi)和沃尔格林(Walgreens)等零售商因持续亏损、盗窃和安全问题而撤离该地区的趋势。批评人士认为,这些门店的关闭凸显了芝加哥当前治理模式的失败,并指出持续的无序状态和恶劣的商业环境正在导致大范围的食品和药店沙漠。 这些门店的关闭引发了关于纳税人补贴零售模式可行性的广泛争论。当地领导人提议采取进一步的政府干预和倾向社会主义的政策来解决食品获取问题,而怀疑论者则警告称,如果不解决公共安全和经济可行性的根本问题,这些模式仍将不可持续,并最终无法服务于它们旨在支持的社区。

相关文章

原文

Save A Lot shuttered seven locations across Chicago's crime-ridden South and West sides over the weekend, once again exposing the dysfunction of a metro area run by unhinged progressives. City officials poured millions of dollars into the grocery outlets in hopes of improving food access, only to watch the stores remain unprofitable amid persistent theft.

Local outlet ABC 7 reports "frustration, anger, and concern" among the community as Save A Lot shuttered seven stores on Saturday, with many residents saying this would reduce their access to food.

The outlet noted:

Save A Lot began a partnership with retail company Yellow Banana in 2023 in an effort to keep grocery stores open on the city's South and West sides and combat food deserts.

A company spokesperson cited financial struggles and cuts to SNAP benefits as reasons for the closures. In a statement, the company said, "We are committed to the wellbeing of the communities we serve. We will continue to engage with City and Community leaders to explore ways to provide access to quality food and services for residents, and we are actively supporting impacted Yellow Banana team members throughout the transition."

The Chicago Sun-Times reported that Yellow Banana had a $26 million redevelopment agreement with the city of Chicago and received more than $13 million in taxpayer financing to renovate and reopen Save A Lot locations. The rest of the funding came from federal grants and loans.

Despite the debate on X over whether the seven locations qualified as "government grocery stores," they were privately owned and operated but supported with taxpayer funding. Even with public backing, the stores failed to turn a profit. Theft was likely a major factor in the shutdowns, although the operator cited broader financial pressures and reductions in SNAP benefits.

Add Save A Lot to the growing list of retailers reducing their exposure to Chicago, alongside Walgreens, Aldi, and Walmart. Walgreens and Aldi explicitly cited theft, burglaries, and violent incidents in certain closures, while Walmart and Save A Lot pointed more broadly to persistent losses and financial headwinds.

The accelerating retail exodus suggests Chicago's progressive governing model enforced by City Hall is backfiring. Without basic public safety and a commercially viable operating environment, progressives risk even broader food and pharmacy deserts in low-income areas as businesses want no part of lawless neighborhoods.

Meanwhile, socialist politicians gaining power at the local level are promoting taxpayer-funded supermarkets and "free food for everyone." Yet history offers little evidence that government-run grocery models can remain efficient, financially sustainable, or responsive to consumers without persistent subsidies. But, of course, these politicans pitch 'this time is different' ... 

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com