马西加入民主党行列,拟就伊朗战争起诉白宫
Massie Joins Democrats In Bid To Sue White House Over Iran War

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/massie-joins-democrats-bid-sue-white-house-over-iran-war

肯塔基州共和党籍联邦众议员托马斯·马西(Thomas Massie)加入了一个由纽约州民主党籍联邦众议员格雷戈里·米克斯(Gregory Meeks)领导的跨党派议员小组,共同推动起诉白宫,理由是白宫无视国会关于终止在伊朗未经授权的军事敌对行动的决议。 该决议于今年早些时候通过,是国会首次利用1973年《战争权力法》指示总统终止军事行动。议员们认为,特朗普政府通过无视该授权,并利用临时停火来规避60天的军事行动限期,属于“公然违反”该法案的行为,他们将这种做法描述为法律“诡计”。 这项拟议的立法旨在迫使众议院议长迈克·约翰逊(Mike Johnson)对行政部门采取法律行动,以执行该决议。马西及其同事主张,行政部门违宪地越权,法院必须介入以维护宪法赋予国会的宣战权力。该小组认为,由于没有任何法院曾裁定1973年《战争权力法》违宪,行政部门有义务遵守该法案。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Dave DeCamp via AntiWar.com,

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) is joining a group of Democrats who are attempting to sue the White House over its refusal to follow a War Powers Resolution that was passed by Congress and directed President Trump to end the war with Iran, Fox News Digital reported Monday.

The War Powers Resolution was passed by both the House and Senate in June, marking the first time Congress approved a concurrent resolution under the 1973 War Powers Act directing the termination of an unauthorized war.

via Fox News

Section 5(c) of the 1973 War Powers Act states that "at any time that United States Armed Forces are engaged in hostilities outside the territory of the United States, its possessions and territories without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, such forces shall be removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent resolution."

Massie told Fox that Trump and US War Secretary Pete Hegseth are "in blatant violation of two sections of the War Powers Resolution of 1973."

"For the first time since the law was enacted, a concurrent resolution has passed in accordance with 5(c) of the law, but the White House has ignored it. It seems they’ve assumed the law is unconstitutional, but no court has ever found that to be the case, so the law remains on the books while the White House flouts it. In the 1983 case INS v. Chadha, the Supreme Court did not opine on the 1973 War Powers Resolution. It's time for the courts to settle this, and that’s what our legislation directs," Massie said.

"They’ve also violated section 5(b) of the law, but rather than ignore the law, they’ve perpetuated a ruse that the 60-day limit on Presidential military activity does not apply with respect to the Iran war, because each time they effect a temporary ceasefire, the statutory clock restarts. We believe no court would agree with this absurdity, and this should be litigated as well," he added.

The legislation to enforce the War Powers Resolution was introduced by Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and has five co-sponsors, four Democrats plus Massie. The bill would require House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) to take legal action against the administration to enforce the concurrent War Powers Resolution.

"The power to declare war rests unequivocally with Congress, yet Speaker Johnson and the vast majority of Republicans have allowed President Trump to trample over the Constitution and wage a war that has not been authorized by Congress," Meeks said in a statement on the bill.

"Nevertheless, Democrats, together with the few Republicans who upheld their oath, successfully passed my Iran War Powers Resolution that requires the president to end his hostilities in Iran last month," he added.

"Despite what the administration might say, I believe my War Powers Resolution is binding, and it is time to settle that question in the courts. As the Speaker of the House, Johnson must bring this suit forward. If the Speaker won't defend congressional prerogatives, we must compel him to do so, which is why I’ve introduced this legislation to force his hand," he added.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com