在理想环境下,Wi-Fi 连接的范围能达到多远?
Long Range Wi-Fi – Pushing 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi to the limits (2019)

原始链接: https://www.phidgets.com/?view=articles&article=LongRangeWifi

无线通信依赖于无线电波,其中信号强度(以瓦特或 dBm 为单位)必须高于背景噪声才能有效传输。由于信号功率会随距离衰减,因此需要使用天线将能量聚焦到特定区域,这一测量指标被称为“增益”(dBi)。总强度即等效全向辐射功率(EIRP),其计算方法是将发射器的 dBm 与天线的 dBi 相加。 在美国和加拿大,无需许可的 2.4GHz Wi-Fi 运行被限制在最大 36dBi (4W) 的 EIRP 以内。为符合规定,用户必须确保其发射器功率与天线增益之和不超过此限制。例如,20dBm 的发射器可以合法搭配增益最高为 16dBi 的天线。虽然存在 5GHz 的选项,但由于信号损耗较低,2.4GHz 在覆盖范围方面通常更具优势。

这篇 Hacker News 帖子探讨了远程 Wi-Fi 连接的实际与理论极限。尽管用户指出,若要克服物理限制,必须具备“理想”条件(如无遮挡视距和高增益天线),但其他人认为标准 Wi-Fi 在远距离应用中几乎不切实际。 主要观点包括: * **技术限制**:Wi-Fi 性能受到确认(ACK)超时限制以及天气和地形等环境因素的阻碍。虽然存在“远程”Wi-Fi(如 802.11ah),但它往往受到监管功率上限和数据吞吐量需求的限制。 * **“黑客”方案**:用户分享了 DIY 的实践经验,包括使用“罐头天线”(cantenna)和高增益八木天线来跨越超过一公里的距离。 * **与业余无线电的对比**:讨论的一部分集中在业余无线电爱好者身上,他们将构建高性能通信系统视为一种技术挑战和爱好,而非现代互联网基础设施的实际替代方案。 * **结论**:大多数参与者认为,虽然挑战 Wi-Fi 的距离极限是一项有趣的工程壮举,但对于实际应用而言,现代点对点无线网桥或有线解决方案要可靠和实用得多。
相关文章

原文

Some Definitions

To get a handle on our main question, we need to establish some background. Wireless communications, such as Wi-Fi, rely on transmitting radio waves at a specific frequency in specific patterns. These patterns are then picked up by a receiving antenna, and translated to usable data. In order for the receiver to understand the incoming signal, it must be strong and clear enough to be distinguished from background noise. The power of a transmission decreases with distance from the transmitter, so to increase the range of a given transmission, you can increase the power in the signal.

The power for wireless communications transmissions is specified in terms of watts, and dBm (decibel-milliwatts). The dBm unit is a logarithmic scale, where 0dBm is one milliwatt, and every additional 10dBm is 10 times more power.

Antennas can be used to boost the effective power of a wireless transmission. They do this by focusing the power that would otherwise be dispersed in all directions into a smaller area. The amount the antenna increases signal strength in its focal area is called the gain. The gain of an antenna is specified in in dBi, which stands for decibels over isotropic, and indicates the amount the input signal is boosted in the focal area relative to a hypothetical antenna that emits power equally in all directions.

Connecting an antenna to a transmitter, the output power of the system is rated in terms of Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power or EIRP. This describes the intensity of the signal in the focal area of the antenna, relative to an antenna that emits power equally in all directions. To calculate the EIRP, you multiply the power of the transmitter by the gain of the antenna. Since both are rated in terms of decibels, the dBm of the transmitter and the dBi of the antenna can be added together to get the EIRP of the sytstem.

How much can I boost my Wi-Fi signal?

Now that we have all the techno-babble established, we can answer this question.

For a Wi-Fi transmitter to be allowed to operate in Canada and the United States, the maximum transmitter output power for a 2.4GHz Wi-Fi transmitter is 1W (30dBm), with a maximum EIRP of 4W (36dBi), before you need to licence your application. [Canadian Regulations] [FCC Regulations]

These regulations are less strict if you are using directional antennas in a fixed point-to-point configuration with no moving parts, but our aim is to control a rover over Wi-Fi, so while this may help in some situations, it does not apply to our test.

For transmitters with less power, you can subtract the power of the transmitter in dBm from 36dBi, and the remaining dBi is the maximum gain you can use for your antenna.

In practical terms, what this means is that you can take a standard Wi-Fi transmitter with 0.1W (20dBm) of output power, and attach it to an antenna with up to 16dBi of gain, and be just within the limits for licence-exempt RF operation in the United States and Canada.

What about 5GHz Wi-Fi?

As a general rule, as the carrier frequency of a transmission is increased, it suffers greater losses as it travels and will have a shorter range. Because of this, 2.4GHz communications will have a longer range than an equivalent 5GHz signal, so we will focus on the former.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com