苹果工程师称因拒绝向AT&T发送客户设备ID而被解雇
Apple engineer says he was fired after refusing to send cust. device IDs to AT&T

原始链接: https://runtimewire.com/article/exclusive-apple-engineer-says-he-was-fired-after-refusing-to-send-customer-devic

前苹果工程师托比·博德曼(Toby Boardman)提起诉讼,指控公司因他提出隐私顾虑而于2024年6月将其非法解雇。博德曼声称,他发现苹果在未经客户许可的情况下,向AT&T共享了包括序列号和IMEI数据在内的敏感客户标识符。 诉状显示,博德曼曾多次向其主管梅格·费舍尔(Meg Fisher)反映这些未经授权的数据传输问题,但据称费舍尔对此不予理会,并要求他“别再找麻烦”。在博德曼拒绝执行这些违规请求后,他受到了内部压力。在因焦虑症和强迫症休了一个月病假后,博德曼本以为会参加关于工作调整的会议,不料却被解雇。苹果公司则将解雇原因归结为绩效问题。 尽管该诉讼指控苹果存在非法处理数据及打击报复行为,且定于2027年11月进行陪审团审判,但目前尚无法院对这些指控予以证实。苹果已正式否认相关指控,坚称解雇是出于合理的商业考量。目前,公司内部政策文件及争议数据传输的相关证据尚未公开。

A former Apple engineer claims he was wrongfully terminated after refusing a directive to share customer device identifiers with AT&T. The incident has sparked a debate on Hacker News regarding corporate ethics and employment law. Commenters are divided on the outcome. Some argue that because the engineer defied a management directive, he lacks legal standing and will likely lose his case. Others suggest that Apple may opt for a private settlement to avoid negative publicity, noting that the company likely wants to prevent headlines concerning poor handling of personally identifiable information (PII). Skepticism regarding AT&T’s data security practices was also a recurring theme in the discussion. Overall, the thread highlights the tension between internal corporate loyalty and individual privacy advocacy.
相关文章

原文

Scoop: RuntimeWire original reporting.

On June 10, 2024, Apple placed a meeting on Toby Boardman’s calendar.

Boardman had just returned from a month of protected medical leave. He had asked to discuss accommodations for anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder. He had also repeatedly complained about his manager, whom he accused of punishing him for raising a customer-privacy concern. Boardman believed the meeting would finally address both issues.

Apple fired him the next day.

The company said his performance was the reason, according to a lawsuit Boardman filed in San Francisco Superior Court. Boardman says that explanation was a pretext. His version of the story begins three years earlier, inside Apple’s technical relationship with the largest wireless carriers in the United States, with a category of data capable of identifying nearly every phone on the network.

Boardman was an Enterprise Systems Engineer. When carrier technicians could not resolve a difficult problem involving an iPhone or cellular iPad, Apple’s account representatives could turn to engineers like him. One recurring request, the complaint says, was for Apple to take a device serial number and return its corresponding International Mobile Equipment Identity, or IMEI. Some requests concerned one device. Others involved batches of as many as 1,000.

Apple considered serial numbers and IMEIs personally identifiable information under its internal policies, Boardman alleges. Representatives working with carriers other than AT&T required the carrier to obtain a customer release before Apple supplied the data. The Apple representative assigned to AT&T did not enforce that requirement, according to the complaint. Boardman says the identifiers were then transmitted through “unsecured email communications.”

He reported the practice to his manager and sought guidance from Apple’s legal department. He alleges that the company never gave him a written response. When he raised the issue directly with his manager, Meg Fisher, Boardman says she told him to “stop being a pain” and move on.

Boardman did the opposite. He began refusing the AT&T requests.

The allegations appear in an employment lawsuit filed on January 22, 2026, against Apple and two of Boardman’s former managers. The case appears to have received no press coverage. Apple filed a general denial in March and said Boardman was terminated for “just cause and business reasons.” On July 14, Judge Rochelle East scheduled a jury trial for November 15, 2027.

No court has found that Apple or AT&T mishandled customer information, that the requested releases were legally required, or that Apple fired Boardman because he objected. The public file does not contain the disputed emails, the report Boardman says he made, the internal privacy policy he relied upon or an example of a customer whose data was shared. Apple’s answer does not specifically address the IMEI allegation.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com