首个设计蛋白质疗法的人体试验震惊美国神经科学家
First human trials of designer protein therapies stun US neuroscientists

原始链接: https://cen.acs.org/biological-chemistry/biotechnology/human-trial-chemogenetic-brain-therapy/104/web/2026/08

在最近的一次美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)脑计划(BRAIN Initiative)会议上,研究人员惊讶地获悉,中国已启动了至少七项将“化学遗传学”技术用于人体的临床试验。这项技术由布莱恩·罗斯(Bryan Roth)于20年前开发,通过病毒载体引入“设计受体”(DREADDs),从而精准抑制特定的神经回路。 虽然DREADDs长期以来一直是实验室神经科学的主要工具,但由于重大的商业和安全障碍,此前从未在临床环境中使用过。中国的这些试验正在测试将其用于治疗难治性癫痫、帕金森病和神经病理性疼痛——这些疾病通常需要进行侵入性脑部手术作为最后手段。 尽管这种方法为传统治疗提供了一种高精度的替代方案,但它也存在风险,包括对病毒递送载体产生潜在的免疫反应。然而,这些试验的迅速扩大表明其已显示出初步的安全性。专家将这一进展视为一个重要的里程碑,并指出如果这些试验获得成功,通过实现基于回路的靶向治疗,可能会彻底改变神经精神疾病的治疗方式。这一发展进一步巩固了中国在神经科学领域日益增长的领导地位。

这篇 Hacker News 讨论聚焦于近期的一份报告,内容涉及中国研究人员利用基因改造逆转录病毒对人类进行脑靶向基因治疗。 对话呈现出两极分化且充满怀疑的态度。批评者认为,科学界对此表现出的“震惊”忽视了重大的伦理和安全隐患,并特别指出过去曾有中国研究人员涉嫌绕过安全规程导致患者死亡的案例。评论者对在中枢神经系统中使用病毒载体表示担忧,并提出了关于意外生物学后果的质疑,例如可能引发类似朊病毒的疾病或不可控的医疗灾难。 讨论中有相当一部分内容演变成了地缘政治辩论。一些用户认为,中国的快速进步源于监管缺失以及将实验置于人命之上的倾向;另一些用户则反驳这些说法是夸大其词的“末日论”。讨论最后演变为关于中美之间科学人才流动模式是否能作为衡量两国技术与伦理走向的有效指标,凸显了在哪个国家更具未来医学创新优势这一问题上深层的对立。
相关文章

原文

 

“Stunned silence.”

That’s how Bryan Roth of the University of North Carolina School of Medicine described the mood at a US National Institutes of Health Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative meeting in Bethesda, Maryland, this week when he told fellow attendees about at least seven clinical trials in China that are testing chemogenetic therapies in humans.

Twenty years ago, Roth developed the chemogenetic technology the trials are using, which is based on a group of proteins called “designer receptors activated by designer drugs,” or DREADDs. Designer drug is a bit of a misnomer in this case; the receptor being used in the Chinese trials responds to a small-molecule drug, clozapine, used to treat schizophrenia. But the designer receptor is much more sensitive to the drug than any human receptor, binding to it with picomolar affinity.

A researcher can introduce the gene encoding the receptor protein to a small group of neurons using a viral vector. Then, when the receptor is expressed and binds to the drug, it suppresses neuronal signaling in those cells and any brain circuits they belong to.

Dirk Trauner, a biochemist at the University of Pennsylvania who works on optogenetics, a related technology, says that DREADDs offer “a more precise knife” that, theoretically, could have reduced side effects compared with other approaches. Small molecules targeting endogenous receptors can have off-target effects when those receptors are expressed in other parts of the brain or when the molecules trigger closely related receptors; in contrast, DREADDs appear only where they are introduced.

The designer receptors have become a widespread research tool in neuroscience, where they have enabled researchers to alter brain circuits’ activity. But until now, they have not been used in the clinic.

“Over the years, folks have approached me to commercialize the technology, but there were all these barriers,” Roth says. “I think nobody wanted to take the risk.”

About 2 months ago, a rumor about designer proteins being introduced to treat brain diseases sent Roth and a postdoctoral scholar looking in clinical trial databases in the US and China. They found seven studies, which investigate intractable epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, and neuropathic pain.

For several of the diseases in question, the therapy of last resort is to remove a portion of the brain, Roth points out. Chemogenetic treatment might avoid that, though if the treatment ended up having unwanted side effects, trial patients might seek relief through surgery after all.

Three of the DREADD trials use an adeno-associated virus as a vector to deliver the chemogenetic therapy. Gene therapies using viruses, such as these, carry the risk of serious, sometimes fatal immune reaction. Several people died recently in early-stage gene therapy trials in China. But Roth points out that six of the studies appear to have begun some months after the first epilepsy trial began, suggesting that investigators might have started after getting some indication that the gene therapy may be safe.

Jacques Carolan, a neuroscientist at University College London who was at the BRAIN Initiative meeting, posted on X on Friday, “If we needed more evidence that China is ahead in neuro, this is it.”

C&EN has reached out for comment to the investigators of record on the clinical trials.

According to Roth, the study with the greatest potential focuses on trigeminal neuropathic pain, which can be debilitating enough that it is a risk factor for suicide. “If that trial is successful, then it opens the way basically to circuit-based therapeutics for virtually all neuropsychiatric diseases,” he says.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com