Ever since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022 with a goal of excising the Russian-speaking Donbas region, American and Western European officials have repeatedly said they and their countries are duty-bound to support Ukraine because, as Nancy Pelosi put it, "The battle for Ukraine is a battle for democracy itself." That notion has been growing ever more farcical over time, as President Volodymyr Zelensky refuses to hold elections that were supposed to happen back in the spring of 2024. Over the weekend, Zelensky doubled down on his preference for martial law, telling journalists it would "destroy the country."
Zelensky is now in the eighth year of his five-year term. His new remarks defending his overstay came after former defense minister Mykhailo Fedorov recently called for elections, after his controversial firing by Zelensky in July. “Democracy cannot be held hostage by Russia," said Fedorov. "We are fighting precisely because we want to remain a free European state." In his nine-minute speech, he also took a shot at Zelensky's way of governing. "It is particularly dangerous when society develops the feeling that the main criterion for an appointment is not professionalism, results or the ability to transform the country, but personal loyalty to the system,” he said.
Speaking to a group of journalists over the weekend, Zelensky firmly rejected calls for elections in his supposed bastion of democracy:
“I believe that if we want to destroy the country, then during such a war we can move in the selection of elections... I believe that during such a war, elections in general are big risks. Elections right now are a tsunami for the state that will split Ukraine."
Zelensky pointed to the logistical and security challenges of balloting during wartime, noting that it would require “the participation of the military, in frontline territories, abroad, where millions of our citizens have gone, fleeing the war” and the risk of "strikes and shelling." He argued it could only begin to be conceivable if Russia were to agree to a ceasefire, which he preemptively ruled an impossibility.
In December, President Trump said he was inclined to see Ukraine hold elections soon. "It's been a long time. Hasn't been doing particularly well. Yeah, I think it's an important time to hold an election. They're using war not to hold an election, but I would think the Ukrainian people should have that choice," he told Politico. "You know, they talk about democracy, but it gets to a point where it's not a democracy anymore."
Skeptics of Zelensky's reasoning might point to elections held in other war-torn countries. For example, Afghanistan held elections in 2004 and 2009, and Iraq held one in 2005. To be fair, violence affected turnout and the legitimacy of the results was questioned. Meanwhile, the UK was supposed to have an election in 1940 but put it off all the way until 1945. The Atlantic Council, which is a de facto NATO think tank, has pointed to the UK example in urging Zelensky to refuse elections during a war -- a war that is happening because of NATO expansionism.
Time is marching on, however. Russia has thus far been content to pursue a slow-burn approach to the war, ever so gradually taking over more and more territory. If that pace continues and if Russia's territorial ambitions widen -- say, to include taking Odessa and creating a landlocked Ukrainian rump state -- we could see Zelensky in charge for years more to come.
...to the continuing hypocritical applause of all those US and European politicians who proclaim Zelensky a hero of democracy.