法官今日将裁定查理·柯克(Charlie Kirk)疑似刺杀者是否接受审判
Judge To Rule Today On Whether Alleged Charlie Kirk Assassin Will Stand Trial

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/judge-rule-today-whether-alleged-charlie-kirk-assassin-will-stand-trial

犹他州法官定于9月1日举行听证会,以确定是否有足够的可能理由对现年23岁的泰勒·詹姆斯·罗宾逊(Tyler James Robinson)进行审判。罗宾逊被控于2025年枪杀保守派评论员查理·柯克(Charlie Kirk)。 罗宾逊面临七项指控,其中包括属于死刑罪名的加重谋杀罪。检方认为,包括DNA、监控录像和据称的供词在内的证据确凿,足以支持案件推进。检方坚持认为,此次枪击事件的性质构成了加重情节,危及了现场观众的安全,因此应判处死刑。 相反,辩护律师则认为,现有证据不足以支持全部七项指控或潜在的死刑判决。他们辩称,检方在有关他人所受风险的问题上依赖推测而非证据。法官托尼·格拉夫(Tony Graf Jr.)目前必须决定是批准案件进入审判程序,还是驳回指控。受害者的遗孀埃里卡·柯克(Erika Kirk)已敦促法院避免诉讼程序出现不必要的拖延。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Janice Hisle via The Epoch Times,

A Utah judge has set a hearing for Sept. 1 to consider whether the high-profile case against conservative commentator Charlie Kirk's alleged assassin, Tyler James Robinson, 23, should go to trial.

Judge Tony Graf Jr. also must weigh whether to uphold seven charges against Robinson, including one carrying a potential death sentence.

Based on evidence presented during a five-day preliminary hearing in early July, prosecutors and defense lawyers will argue at 10 a.m. MDT in the Fourth District Court in Provo, Utah.

Lawyers representing Kirk's widow, Erika Kirk, urged Graf to rule by Sept. 1, a court record says, arguing against any "undue delay" while preserving Robinson's right to a fair trial.

It was unknown whether the judge would comply with that request.

By law, the judge's sole task is to decide whether there is probable cause - a required step before the case can head to trial, prosecutors noted.

That legal standard "requires 'evidence sufficient to support a reasonable belief that an offense has been committed and that the defendant committed it,'" prosecutors explained in a news release, citing state law.

If Graf finds probable cause, he must "bind over" the case for trial; otherwise, the judge must dismiss the charges, and prosecutors could resubmit the charges later.

Prior to the hearing, both sides filed written arguments with dramatically different interpretations of the evidence.

Defense attorneys opined that the evidence was insufficient to prove required elements of all seven charges against their client. They also challenged prosecutors' assertion that the circumstances warrant the death penalty.

The shooting of Kirk imperiled other lives, prosecutors said, arguing that risk of harm to others is an "aggravating" circumstance that the law requires for a death-penalty-level charge.

"Common sense" dictates that "firing a gun, especially a high-powered rifle towards others puts them at great risk of death," prosecutors said.

On Sept. 10, 2025 - almost a year ago - Kirk was fatally shot in the neck as he answered questions from an audience of about 3,000 people at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah.

Defense lawyers argued that the law requires proof beyond a mere "possibility" that someone else could have been killed. They noted a single shot was fired, not multiple shots, and that Robinson had never expressed any intention to hurt anyone other than Kirk.

Kirk, a 31-year-old father of two, was best known as a conservative speaker who started a political movement for young voters, Turning Point USA, when he was 19. Prosecutors say evidence points to Robinson targeting Kirk over his "political expression."

Robinson is accused of aggravated murder, a capital offense. He also faces six other charges: two counts of obstructing justice, two counts of witness tampering, along with causing serious bodily harm by discharging a firearm and committing violence in the presence of a child.

In a July 28 court filing, prosecutors told the judge that the case is clear-cut.

"This is as likely as straight-forward a bindover decision as this Court will ever see," they wrote, adding: "This isn't a close case. The State presented more than enough evidence to support a probable cause finding on all seven charges."

Many circumstances implicate Robinson, prosecutors said, such as admitting to his lover that he had killed Kirk. DNA evidence, eyewitness testimony, and surveillance videos all link Robinson to the shooting scene, they said.

They noted defense lawyers "did not challenge the substance of the evidence" pointing to Robinson as the shooter.

Defense lawyers instead argued that prosecutors' contentions called for impermissible "speculation" rather than reasonable inferences.

Prosecutors countered that defense attorneys ignored evidence that was damning to Robinson and improperly contorted legal standards to favor their client.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com