纳维-斯托克斯方程中无人提及的部分
OpenAI’s Navier-Stokes release included a Lean 4 formal proof

原始链接: https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2026/09/09/formal-method-revolution/

OpenAI 最近对纳维-斯托克斯方程的证明,标志着数学领域的一次重大转变,其核心在于使用了 Lean 4 进行机器可验证的证明。 从历史上看,将数学证明形式化极其耗费成本。曾有估算表明,形式化一页本科数学内容需要 40 个工作小时;若将此逻辑应用于复杂的学术论文,意味着每个项目需要数千小时的工作量。然而,OpenAI 仅用了 17 小时就验证了他们 166 页的论文——这使工作量降低了四个数量级。 这一跨越具有真正的革命性。通过让形式化验证变得触手可及,人工智能将其从一种精英化、耗时的学术实践,转变为普通研究人员可用的实用工具。除了纯数学领域,这项技术还对网络安全、智能合约审计以及关键任务软件工程等高风险领域具有深远影响。随着验证成本的暴跌,保证复杂系统正确性的能力将成为一种标准预期,而非奢侈需求。

这篇 Hacker News 的讨论聚焦于近期利用人工智能在 Lean 中实现纳维-斯托克斯方程证明形式化的成就。 尽管许多人认可这一里程碑,但讨论中也充斥着怀疑与技术争论。一些评论者认为这一成就被夸大了,他们指出,现代 Lean 库相比过去的标准大幅降低了形式化所需的工作量,因此其“难度”常被高估。另一些人则从经济角度展开辩论,质疑基于智能体(agent)的算力成本是否真的比人类智力劳动更有进步意义。 在技术讨论的背后隐藏着一种不安感。用户猜测可能存在数据剥削,担心人工智能模型是否使用了当前正致力于此问题的数学家的私人笔记进行训练,并表达出一种广泛的生存疲惫感。参与者感到,那些专业的、具有“魔力”的人类智力追求正沦为仅仅可以通过自动化解决的机械难题,这种人工智能发展的飞速进程让许多人感到不安。
相关文章

原文

Yesterday OpenAI announced a proof that settled a long-standing question about the Navier-Stokes equations from fluid dynamics. The announcement has created a lot of buzz, as one would expect. But there’s an aspect of OpenAI’s work that I haven’t seen anyone talk about: they posted a Lean 4 formal proof at the same time as their conventional human-readable proof.

Quite a few other mathematical conjectures have been settled recently using AI, and these have also been accompanied with formal proofs, using Lean 4 in particular.

Until very recently, generating machine-verifiable formal proofs has been excruciatingly tedious. In 2005, Henk Barendregt and Freek Wiedijk wrote

To give an indication of how much work is needed for formalisation, we estimate that it takes approximately one work-week (five work-days of eight work-hours) to formalise one page from an undergraduate mathematics textbook.

That was the rule of thumb: forty hours per page. And this in the context of undergraduate textbooks. Research publications are much denser than textbooks. Furthermore, page 100 of a textbook probably depends mostly on material on pages 1 through 99. A sentence in a research article could cite anything that has been published before.

Say a research article takes 20 times more effort to formalize than page in an undergraduate textbook. Then formalizing the 166-page paper from OpenAI would take 132,800 person-hours. It took OpenAI 17 hours to verify their proof in Lean. I hesitate to use the word “revolutionary,” but lowering the cost of anything by four orders of magnitude is revolutionary.

I’ve used AI to generate formal proofs to check my work just for a little blog post. I wouldn’t dream of doing that if I had to pay someone a week’s salary to check my work.

Formal verification doesn’t just apply to mathematics. You could, for example, formally verify that a set of security policies are consistent and that, given certain assumptions, they accomplish their purpose. You could formally verify that a smart contract imposes a certain maximum liability. You could verify the correctness of mission-critical algorithms. These problems are easier than formalizing mathematics research, and it is easier to quantify the return on investment.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com