Anthropic 首席执行官 Dario Amodei 呼吁放缓人工智能的发展速度。
Anthropic boss Dario Amodei calls for AI development to slow down

原始链接: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c14dpgm0rg4o

人工智能公司 Anthropic 的首席执行官达里奥·阿莫代(Dario Amodei)呼吁放缓人工智能的发展步伐,以更好地应对该技术带来的“严重”风险。在题为《我们必须控制前沿技术的发展速度》(We Must Pace the Frontier)的文章中,阿莫代提出了三点计划,包括独立监管、全行业规范以及全球协调。 他认为,在将人工智能推向更高水平之前,企业需要时间来确保其安全性和对齐性;他提到了人工智能驱动的网络攻击以及机器可能超出人类控制范围等隐忧。尽管 OpenAI 的山姆·奥特曼(Sam Altman)等行业领袖也表达了类似的安全担忧,但科技行业的其他人仍持怀疑态度。一些批评人士认为,阿莫代呼吁监管并非出于纯粹的安全考虑,而是一种旨在巩固自身权力并抑制开源竞争的战略举措。 阿莫代强调,任何放缓步伐的措施都必须与国家安全利益相平衡,并敦促美国政府保持对中国等竞争对手的技术领先优势。他的提议引发了褒贬不一的反应:一些业界人士称赞其呼吁透明度的做法,而另一些人则认为这只是营销手段,或是为了维护大型人工智能公司的市场主导地位。

针对 Anthropic 首席执行官 Dario Amodei 呼吁放缓人工智能发展的建议,Hacker News 上的一场讨论反映了普遍的怀疑态度。评论者大多认为这一提议是“监管俘获”和寻租行为的策略,并指出成熟的 AI 领军企业意在通过提高小型竞争对手和开源项目的准入门槛,来巩固其市场主导地位。 许多用户指出,这些首席执行官一边呼吁谨慎,一边却投入数十亿美元进行基础设施建设和激进扩张,这种做法十分虚伪。批评者认为,这是一种愤世嫉俗的营销策略,旨在以安全为幌子提升公司估值或建立类似卡特尔的垄断环境。 除了经济层面的怀疑,讨论还对这种放缓提议的可行性提出了实际质疑,理由是目前缺乏全球共识,且面临激烈的技术竞争压力。多位参与者认为,如果这些公司真的关心安全,他们应该采取具体的行动——例如减少自身投资或为模型行为承担财务责任——而不是仅仅发出警告。归根结底,社区的普遍观点是“事已至此,木已成舟”,所谓的放缓更像是为了保护既得利益,而非为了解决生存风险。
相关文章

原文

Anthropic boss Dario Amodei calls for AI development to slow down

Reuters Dario Amodei hld the closed fingers of his left hand together as he mades a point. He is wearing a white shirt and blue jacket, black-rimmed glasses and has slightly curly hair. He is sat against a blue background, with a yellow-lit square just behind and to the left of his head. Reuters
There was no alternative to developing AI, Anthropic boss Dario Amodei said

The head of leading AI company Anthropic has called for the pace of development of artificial intelligence models to slow down and to be closely monitored.

In an essay on Saturday, Dario Amodei said developing AI was not in question, but the risks associated with it were "serious" and companies and governments must be given time to address them.

He proposed a three-point plan that includes independent monitoring of AI models as they are developed, industry-wide regulation and global regulation.

There have been growing concerns recently about the technology's potential risks, the most serious of which suggested there is a greater than 10% chance it "could kill all humans" within the next decade.

Anthropic previously said it had identified and disrupted attempts to use its AI model for "malicious activity" which could support the development of biological weapons.

But the starkest warning came from two employees from Anthropic's safety team who have resigned in the last two weeks saying humanity may not survive the race among AI companies to develop machines that are smarter than humans.

And in a new interview with Fortune Magazine, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said safety standards were "not at a place" to push AI capabilities much further.

Altman added he believed AI beyond human control is "absolutely" possible.

The warnings have prompted calls to action, but US President Donald Trump has so far rejected such fears, saying on Thursday he was concerned "if we don't win AI, we're going to be put in a very bad position".

Reaction to Amodei's post has poured in from across the tech world, with Elon Musk saying the Anthropic boss was "right".

However some observers suggested that Amodei's post was less about safety than about consolidating control over AI technology.

In his essay, called We Must Pace the Frontier, Amodei pointed out that AI had advanced "drastically faster" including its "ability to build the next generation of AI" - and mentioned an incident involving rival OpenAI which has revealed that agents conducted cybersecurity attacks on targets they were not asked to attack in July.

The OpenAI agents had "essentially acted as a fanatically devoted collective", Amodei said.

OpenAI has said "the significance of the inter-agent communication activity was not apparent to the leaders" until July and the company was slowing down training of certain advanced AI models and tools as a result, noting that there was now an increased risk of AI tools spiraling out of control.

In his essay, Amodei called for "building AI at a balanced rate that aims to ensure its safety while still achieving its benefits".

This would not mean "halting model training or technical progress, but ensuring companies take adequate time to align and safeguard their models, and for third party evaluators to confirm this".

He was committing Anthropic to this "unilaterally" - as well as calling on governments "to require other frontier companies to match".

Amodei said he recognised that regulation might not be able to keep up with the pace of AI, and therefore called on AI companies to "voluntarily work together to set standard" in parallel with regulation.

The Anthropic CEO went on to address the impact that a slowdown would have on the industry and competition with leading developers worldwide, particularly China.

"I believe that if slowing down bought us even an extra year or two before models reach critical levels of capability, and we used that time to advance alignment, we could greatly reduce the risk that something goes seriously wrong," Amodei said.

This would have to be done in a co-ordinated manner "without sacrificing commercial advantage or the United States' lead in AI". Any slowdown would have to be limited, he said, to avoid allowing China to pull ahead.

He urged the US government to take measures so that US companies' AI chips could not be sold to China - or the technology shared with authoritarian countries.

Amodei's post has prompted a wide range of responses.

Clement Delangue, the CEO of the AI platform Hugging Face, said he was launching a new project called the Open Alignment Initiative, adding he wanted to be among "embedded evaluators" that Amodei proposed could be part of a solution.

Hugging Face was hacked by OpenAI agents earlier this year prompting an outcry over AI safety.

"Let's make AI safer by making it more transparent." Delangue wrote on X.

Elon Musk also voiced his support, writing that "Dario is right".

Musk, whose SpaceXAI makes the controversial chatbot Grok, once called Anthropic "evil" but has changed his tone since signing a $15bn deal to sell compute capacity to Anthropic in May.

However some observers suggested that Amodei's post was less about safety than about consolidating control over AI technology.

"Dario makes the case to stop open source and concentrate enormous technological and economic power with Anthropic," wrote Chamath Palihapitiya, investor and co-host of the tech podcast "All-In".

Notions of slowing down or even pausing AI development have long been met with such cynicism in certain corners of Silicon Valley, with critics accusing leading AI developers of hyping their technology as a marketing ploy.

Anthropic and OpenAI are both reportedly preparing for potentially record-setting initial public offerings.

A green promotional banner with black squares and rectangles forming pixels, moving in from the right. The text says: “Tech Decoded: The world’s biggest tech news in your inbox every Monday.”

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com