《变形:近代早期翻翻书中的演变(19世纪)》
Metamorphosis: Transformations in the Early Modern Flap Book (19th Century)

原始链接: https://publicdomainreview.org/collection/metamorphosis-early-modern-flap-book/

1816年版的《变形:图画的转变》(*Metamorphosis: or, a Transformation of Pictures*)是“哈利奎恩”(harlequinades)——即17至19世纪流行的一种翻页机关书——的迷人典范。这类书籍旨在通过互动游戏对儿童进行教育,利用可展开的嵌板来呈现戏剧性的转变,例如亚当变成夏娃,或是一个人逐渐衰老直至死亡。 尽管这些书的内容往往阴郁且带有说教意味,重点强调死亡的不可避免和财富的虚浮,但它们却大受欢迎。它们起到了早期教育工具的作用,将识字辅助与道德教训相结合,甚至激发了年轻读者亲手抄写和制作手抄本的风气。 虽然这些书旨在灌输宗教和道德价值观,但其互动性也引发了颠覆性的可能。通过物理操纵书中的人物,孩子们可以改造神话生物,或打破成年人强加的刻板叙事。作为现代视频游戏等教育媒体的先驱,这些机关书证明了触觉参与与视觉叙事的结合是一种强大的媒介,能够俘获一代又一代人的想象力——无论他们是领悟了其中预设的道德课程,还是仅仅享受着变形带来的乐趣。

Hacker News 最新 | 往期 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 招聘 | 提交 登录 变形:近代早期翻翻书中的蜕变(19世纪)(publicdomainreview.org) 4 分,由 benbreen 在 2 小时前发布 | 隐藏 | 往期 | 收藏 | 讨论 | 帮助 指导方针 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请 YC | 联系 搜索:
相关文章

原文

The opening leaf of the 1816 edition of Metamorphosis: or, a Transformation of Pictures with Poetical Explanations for the Amusement of Young Persons provides a reassuring disclaimer:

That we may not mislead our little readers, it is desired they would understand the Mermaid and Griffin to be only creatures of fable, that never did exist. And although Death is represented in the form of a human skeleton, yet this is only an emblem; for Death is not a being but a state.

Such a warning was perhaps necessary because of the startling technology on display in the next pages. By manipulating paper flaps, the child could turn Adam into Eve into a mermaid, a lion into a griffin into an eagle — all while learning about the inevitability of death.

Metamorphosis, or, A Transformation of Pictures, with Poetical Explanations (Philadelphia: Printed by J. Rakestraw, 1816).

“Moving books” such as this, also known as harlequinades or flap books, became popular with the explosion of cheap printing in the seventeenth century. Metamorphosis was an adaptation of The Beginning, Progress and End of Man, a popular single-sheet pamphlet first published during the English Civil War (the earliest example dates from 1650). As Jacqueline Reid-Walsh points out, the figures in these early editions bear a remarkable resemblance to Charles I — but whether that was a reflection of contemporary fashions or an indication that the pamphlet had political import is hard to tell. Nevertheless, dozens of versions, with varying illustrations and texts, were reprinted on both sides of the Atlantic over the next two centuries.

Benjamin Sands, the writer credited on the American editions — the earliest was printed in 1789 — seems to have been responsible primarily for the continuation of the text (numbers 13–21), which gives the story of Adam and Eve in verse form. He may also have been responsible for aiming these editions at young readers, transforming an older text into a general literacy aid; some editions included a primer of the alphabet and basic numerals.

Several editions move across four panels: in the first, we see how Adam begets Eve, who begets a mermaid, another woman whose speech lures one to ruin. The second shows a lion become a griffin become an eagle, who steals a baby. (Eagles seem to have been a common bogeyman: one of the remarkable eighteenth-century DIY learning aids, made by the Englishwoman Jane Johnson, also warns against the dangers eagles posed to unattended and perhaps unwary infants.)

Metamorphosis (Cadiz, Ohio (?): Printed by H. Anderson, 1836).

We then home in on man’s lifecycle: the baby, saved from the eagle, sets out to become rich; by panel four he is a prosperous gentleman — but, of course, death comes for us all. “O MAN !” the last panel exclaims. “Now see thou art but dust; / Thy gold and silver is but rust; / Thy time is come, thy glass is spent; / What is there that can Death prevent”. The skeleton (the mere emblem of the state of death) looms over the dying man in his bed, an arrow poised to pierce him through.

A cheery lesson, to be sure, but pessimism did not seem to diminish the book’s popularity in the slightest. In fact, the physical engagement one had with it inspired many readers to create their own editions: there are a remarkable number of extant amateur manuscripts of Metamorphosis. Yale’s Beinecke Library holds several, ranging from pen-and-ink looseleaf sketches by one young woman to a young man’s bound watercolor volume.

The Metamorphosis was so popular among American children (or their parents) that it was published in translation, within the United States itself. In 1833, a German edition was published in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, with new illustrations — including one of a Christian knight tangling with the devil — and an additional poem “In Praise of the Farmer”. German speakers got into the DIY game, too.

The effectiveness and popularity of the moving book as a didactic aid, which brought elements of play into learning, prefigured in some ways the rise of the educational movie or video game. Other classic texts got the same treatment: the work of the seventeenth-century nonconformist preacher — and children’s education enthusiast — John Bunyan was illustrated and republished as a movable book, providing a tactile emphasis to its lessons. In an 1819 American edition of The Pilgrim’s Progress, the shock encounter with the demon Apollyon is hidden, as it is for the Pilgrim himself, behind the ascent of the Hill Difficulty.

Metamorphosis, or, A Transformation of Pictures, with Poetical Explanations (Philadelphia: Printed by G. Strong, 1834)).

In Thomas Wright’s 1889 novel The Chalice of Carden, set in eighteenth-century Buckinghamshire, a nine-year-old girl named Sophie stumbles on a copy of The Beginning, Progress and End of Man in the cottage where she is staying with her deeply religious relatives, Margaret and Geordie.

“But what’s it all mean?” asked Sophie, still lingering, and pointing to the pictures.
“Mean?” said Geordie. “What should it mean? It’s a panorama to amuse little folk like you.”

Sophie is entranced by the visual transformations, though perhaps less by the religious lessons they were meant to impart. For Reid-Walsh, it is the moving book’s capacity for subversion that explains their enduring appeal. After all, what was to stop a child from turning Adam into a “creature of fable”?

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com