福奇日记中解释了为何必须推行“让美国再次健康”(MAHA)运动的内容
The Fauci Diary Entry That Explains Why MAHA Must Exist

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fauci-diary-entry-explains-why-maha-must-exist

彼得·纳瓦罗认为,安东尼·福奇博士的私人日记揭露了其在2021年新冠疫苗加强针推广活动中存在蓄意欺骗的行为。纳瓦罗指出,尽管福奇在公开场合极力推行全民加强针,但其私人笔记却承认政府的相关宣传缺乏充分数据支持。 根据纳瓦罗的说法,福奇在内部表达过担忧,例如质疑是否所有公民都需要加强针,还是仅针对高风险的老年群体;然而,福奇最终选择优先保证“口径一致”,而非追求科学精准。当美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)咨询委员会最初拒绝全面强制接种加强针,转而支持基于风险的窄范围接种策略时,纳瓦罗注意到福奇将这种科学谨慎评价为“重大错误”。 纳瓦罗认为,“私下的托尼”与“公开的托尼”之间的这种矛盾,证明了“医疗工业复合体”将服从性置于知情同意之上。他主张,政府为了维持一套简化的通用口号,推行了强制性政策,却无视了自然免疫和基于年龄的风险等细微差别。最终,纳瓦罗利用这些披露的内容为“让美国再次健康”(MAHA)运动背书,呼吁拆除那套允许政府官员将未定论的科学转化为不容置疑之教条的体制机器。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Peter Navarro via The Epoch Times,

I fought Anthony Fauci across a White House table over the China travel ban, lockdowns, masks, hydroxychloroquine, vaccines, and boosters.

Yet one of the most damning pieces of evidence I have ever seen against the man did not surface until six years later, when Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) released Fauci's private pandemic diary.

It is an entry dated Aug. 15, 2021. The Biden White House was preparing to roll out a broad COVID booster campaign. Behind closed doors, Fauci knew there was a problem.

The evidence was thin.

The case for boosting everybody was weak.

And the administration needed a message.

Here is what Fauci wrote:

"If we are too precise we will be called out because we cannot back it with data."

Read that again.

This was not Anthony Fauci struggling heroically with scientific uncertainty. This was the president's chief medical adviser admitting, in private, that the government could not support its public booster message with the data.

Worse, the decision was already moving ahead.

Fauci described himself and the White House medical team as trying to "fashion [a] coherent message to justify the announcement" that boosters would be offered broadly.

The policy came first. The justification came afterward.

And Fauci knew exactly where the scientific weakness lay.

In the same diary entry, he identified the real question: Did everybody need another shot, or only the elderly and those with underlying conditions?

That was not some question raised later by "anti-vaxxers." Fauci himself was asking it privately before the universal campaign rolled forward.

Yet instead of insisting that the government stop, gather the evidence, and tell Americans precisely what was known and unknown, Fauci helped fashion the message.

His own words are devastating: precision was dangerous because precision could expose that the government "cannot back it with data."

Five weeks later, the government's own scientific advisers effectively vindicated the concern Fauci had privately recorded - but publicly ignored.

On Sept. 17, 2021, the FDA's outside advisory committee voted 16-2 against Pfizer's request to give a booster to everyone 16 and older.

Then, when the proposal was narrowed to older and high-risk Americans, the same committee overwhelmingly supported it.

Same experts. Same meeting. Same evidence.

No to everybody.

Yes to those most at risk.

That was precisely the distinction Fauci had privately identified.

So what did Fauci do when independent experts arrived publicly at essentially the same conclusion he had privately entertained?

He did not celebrate science working as intended.

His diary records that he was "disappointed."

When FDA officials moved toward the narrower authorization, Fauci called it "a major mistake."

That tells you what this story is really about.

It is not simply that Anthony Fauci got a medical question wrong. Scientists get things wrong.

It is that the answer Fauci's Medical Industrial Complex wanted had begun to outrank the evidence.

A recommendation says: Here is what we know. Here is what we do not know. Here are the risks and benefits. You and your physician decide.

A mandate says: Take the product or pay a price - perhaps your job, your military career, your education, or your ability to participate in ordinary life.

The second requires stronger evidence than the first.

During COVID, Washington repeatedly moved in the opposite - and authoritarian - direction.

The more coercive the policy became, the simpler the message became.

Age disappeared.

Comorbidities disappeared.

Natural immunity was pushed aside.

Known concerns such as myocarditis in younger men became inconvenient complications to a universal slogan. Miscarriage risk in the first trimester - mum, not Mom, was the word.

Everybody vaccinate.

Everybody boost.

That is not informed consent.

That is compliance.

My forthcoming book, "Why Fauci MUST Rot in Prison: His Diary. My Diary. Your Verdict," puts Fauci's private diary beside the public record and beside my own contemporaneous record from inside the first Trump White House.

Again and again, Private Tony knew things Public Tony did not tell you.

Private Tony had doubts.

Public Tony had certainty.

Private Tony saw complications.

Public Tony sold slogans.

And when the evidence threatened the slogan, the problem became how to "fashion" the message.

That is why this story matters to the MAHA movement far beyond Anthony Fauci.

MAHA must break the machinery that allowed one government official, surrounded by an obedient medical establishment, Big Pharma, compliant media, and censorious technology companies, to convert unsettled science into government dogma.

Science requires dissent.

Medicine requires individual judgment.

Informed consent requires the whole truth.

And no government official should ever again be permitted to hide uncertainty from the people while privately worrying that telling them the precise truth would expose that he could not "back it with data."

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com