纽约宣布游戏所有权法案,要求拥有所有权而非许可
NY announces game ownership bill requiring ownership rather than licensing

原始链接: https://www.tomshardware.com/video-games/new-york-rep-announces-game-ownership-bill-that-would-require-consumer-ownership-rather-than-sale-of-licenses-would-also-require-publishers-to-keep-the-game-functional-after-support-ends

众议员里奇·托雷斯提出《玩家权利法案》,旨在通过指示联邦贸易委员会监管游戏所有权来保护玩家。该法案将授予消费者所购游戏的实际所有权,而非可撤销许可,并要求在服务器关闭前提供离线模式。它追随宾夕法尼亚州参议员约翰·凯恩的《保护我们的游戏法案》和“停止杀死游戏”运动。引用的例子包括育碧《The Crew》停服、《NBA 2K25》两年后下架,以及《守望先锋2》取代原版。索尼辩称购买的是许可,而非持久权利。该法案还可能涉及转让权,尤其是实体副本,但细节尚不清楚。倡导者说,盗版往往在无DRM的情况下提供更好的体验。该立法标志着终结游戏行业反消费者做法的重要一步。

纽约宣布了一项要求游戏所有权而非许可的法案,引发了 Hacker News 讨论。评论者大多支持这一想法,并认为可行:开发者通常已有本地服务器栈,发布可执行文件将让社区在停服后运行游戏。其他人指出关于离线支持、点对点和社区服务器的执法问题,以及开发商破产等边缘情况。一些人强调,游戏历史上开箱即可离线运行,公司主要需要避免干扰保存工作。
相关文章

原文

Rep. Ritchie Torres of New York's 15th congressional district has introduced the Power To The Players Act. This new legislation aims to protect consumers by directing the FTC to establish regulations on game ownership to curb anti-consumer business practices. "Under the bill, buying a video game would give the consumer ownership of the game rather than a license to play it," the release says. "Games with online functionality would also be required to provide an offline mode before the servers supporting them are shut down."

Games having an expiration date despite being more expensive than ever has been scrutinized by players all over the world, along with aggressive monetization schemes within the games themselves. Rep. Ritchie Torres isn’t the first to fight for gamers, as Pennsylvania state senator John Kane also recently introduced the Protect Our Games Act, requiring publishers to provide an offline mode, community servers, or a 25% minimum refund. Players want to be able to enjoy their games even if the publisher decides to stop supporting the game, but Sony doesn’t think the players own their games and that they have the right to pull the rug from under them. Sony’s lawyers even recently said in a defense in an ongoing class action lawsuit that clicking on the “purchase” button would obviously not lead the consumer to think that they were acquiring a durable right to use the game instead of a revocable license; basically a one-time rent fee that Sony could take away at any moment that benefits them.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com