Z世代是第一代比父母更笨的人
Gen Z Is the First Generation Dumber Than Their Parents

原始链接: https://www.vice.com/en/article/gen-z-is-the-first-generation-dumber-than-their-parents-neuroscientist-claims/

Z世代是第一代在标准化测试中得分低于上一代的现代一代,神经科学家Jared Cooney Horvath表示,其注意力、记忆力、读写能力、算术能力、执行功能和智商均下降。他将这一衰退归因于大量屏幕时间和学校技术用略读取代深度学习;大脑适应速度,而非持续注意力。在约80个国家,课堂数字化普及后也出现了类似模式。许多年轻人尽管表现下降仍保持自信,这可能阻碍改进。Horvath呼吁克制、减少学校屏幕使用,并在进一步认知衰退之前恢复严格、有摩擦的学习。

Hacker News 的一个帖子链接到 Vice 的一篇文章,声称 Z 世代是第一代比父母更不聪明的一代。评论者争论这种下降反映的是有缺陷的测试,还是注意力、记忆、读写能力、计算能力、执行功能和智商等方面的真实认知损失。提出的成因包括设计糟糕的教育科技、资金不足的学校、智能手机、新冠疫情时期的远程学习,以及父母教养,尤其是 X 世代和千禧一代的父母。其他人认为每一代人都说下一代更笨,而一些人引用 PISA 成绩下降和分数分布扩大作为证据。帖子还质疑数字生活是否改变被测量的技能,而不仅仅是降低智力,以及 Alpha 世代是否会遵循不同模式。一个次要的旁支讨论争论语法。总体而言,关于 Z 世代究竟是真正能力更弱,还是被过时的标准衡量,尚无共识。
相关文章

原文

Gen Z has managed something no modern generation pulled off before. After more than a century of steady academic gains, test scores finally went the other direction. For the first time ever, a new generation is officially dumber than the previous one.

The data comes from neuroscientist Jared Cooney Horvath, who has spent years reviewing standardized testing results across age groups. “They’re the first generation in modern history to score lower on standardized academic tests than the one before it,” Horvath told the New York Post. The declines cut across attention, memory, literacy, numeracy, executive function, and general IQ. That’s not just one weak spot. That’s the whole darn dashboard blinking at once.

Horvath took the same message to Capitol Hill during a 2026 Senate hearing on screen time and children. His framing skipped the generational dunking and focused on exposure. “More than half of the time a teenager is awake, half of it is spent staring at a screen,” he told lawmakers. Human learning, he argued, depends on sustained attention and interaction with other people. Endless feeds and condensed content don’t offer either.

Is Gen Z Really Dumber Than Their Parents?

Schools leaned hard into technology during the same window. Educational software replaced textbooks, long readings, and extended problem-solving. After class, students returned to phones, tablets, and laptops, bouncing between social feeds and bite-sized explanations of material they never sat with for very long. Horvath described the outcome as students trained to skim. Skimming feels efficient, but it doesn’t build depth.

“I’m not anti-tech. I’m pro-rigor,” Horvath told the Post. Rigor, in his view, comes from friction. Reading full texts. Working through confusion. Spending time with material that doesn’t immediately reward you. Take that friction away, and cognitive skills dull. Brains adapt to the environment they’re given, and this one prizes speed over staying power.

The same decline appears outside the United States. Horvath told senators that across roughly 80 countries, academic performance drops after digital technology becomes widely embedded in classrooms. The timing alone raises serious questions about how learning environments affect cognitive development.

Now, this is awkward. Horvath said many young people remain highly confident in their intelligence despite lower measured performance. Confidence isn’t the issue. Confidence without correction stalls improvement.

This conversation feels uncomfortable because it doesn’t offer villains or easy fixes. Horvath summed it up bluntly during his testimony. “A sad fact our generation has to face is this: Our kids are less cognitively capable than we were at their age.” His recommendation focused on restraint, dialing back screens in schools, and restoring depth before the next generation is doomed. 

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com