我不再想开发任何 Ruby gem,所以我归档了所有仓库。
I no longer care to work on any Ruby gems so I've archived all my repositories

原始链接: https://po-ru.com/2026/10/18/why-im-no-longer-updating-this-repository

作者正在归档他们的 Ruby gems,解释他们不再希望为 Ruby 开发做贡献。Ruby 最初由 Matz 设计,以服务于人类的喜悦与创造力,但那个时代已经过去。Rails——Ruby 的主流框架——由持争议观点的人控制。抛开 Rails 不谈,Ruby 本身现在在很大程度上是用 LLM 代理开发的,而 Matz 正在将其重新定位为"AI 时代的编程语言",供机器输出。作者拒绝向一个被企业掠夺性开采、用来喂养 AI 系统的共有资源贡献人类编写的代码——那些 AI 系统的无思想输出正在污染它。他们与 Ruby gem 开发彻底告别了。

A Ruby gem maintainer archived all repositories, saying they no longer feel inspired to contribute to a commons being “strip-mined” by AI. The Hacker News thread explores widespread grief among software engineers who loved hand-coding: many feel joy is fading as LLM agents take over implementation, leaving architecture and supervision. Some welcome liberation from tedious work and faster problem-solving; others mourn lost craft, community, and open-source sustainability amid slop PRs and licensing concerns. Commenters debate skill atrophy, software quality, economic impacts, and whether promised productivity gains will materialize. Views range from embracing agent-driven development to walking away from coding as a profession, with some predicting a self-segregation of human-only coding communities.
相关文章

原文

I’ve decided to archive the source code of my Ruby gems to make it clear that I’m no longer working on them; I’ve written this post to link from them in order to explain why.

In an article published in 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto (a.k.a. “Matz”), designer of Ruby, wrote,

For me, the purpose of life is, at least partly, to have joy. Programmers often feel joy when they can concentrate on the creative side of programming, so Ruby is designed to make programmers happy.

And as recently as a 2019 interview, he said,

I designed Ruby for humans, not for machines.

It was during that era, when Ruby was ostensibly for joy, for creativity, for humans, that I developed this code. But that age, of doing things for humans, has passed, and with it my enthusiasm for working on Ruby gems. I won’t say it was always great, but at least we were working with and for people.

The pre-eminent application of Ruby has been making web applications using Rails. Rails is open source software but it’s owned and controlled by a man whose views I find abhorrent, although there is an ongoing effort to fork it. To judge by his keynote at Rails World this year – the conference that he himself set up in pique after he wasn’t invited to RailsConf a couple of years ago – he is no longer particularly interested in Ruby, Rails, or even programming itself. (He’s now using LLM agents to churn out apps in Rust, a language which he compares to “pouring acid into [his] eyes”, but that’s apparently fine because he doesn’t even look at what they generate.)

But even beyond Rails, the Ruby language itself is now substantially developed using LLM agents. Matz is giving talks repositioning Ruby as a “Programming Language for AI age”, to be emitted by LLM agents, and stating that to be able to do that LLMs need to consume more good human-written Ruby code. You might already have seen the problem here.

In that context, I no longer feel inspired to contribute to a commons that’s being strip-mined by massive corporations to feed the very machines whose unthinking output pollutes it. When people claim that it’s no longer sustainable to write code by hand, they’re not entirely wrong, but only in the same way that it’s no longer sustainable to sleep in a bed once someone has taken a shit in it.

You want changes? Go ask your agent or something. I’m told that’s what you’re supposed to do now. I’m out.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com