法国需要读我的论文
France needs to read my paper

原始链接: https://wilsoniumite.com/2026/10/23/france-needs-to-read-my-paper/

在一篇宏观经济学综述中,专家与法国政策制定者似乎因法国主权债券收益率上升而困惑,并在财政选项上陷入瘫痪。紧缩与加税都看似不可行。作者与合著者认为他们的论文提供了说明与对策:区分“好资本主义”(创新与增长的回报)与“坏资本主义”(经济租金/寻租),仅对后者征税。呼应乔治主义思想,他们提议以土地价值税资助全民基本收入,作为在不损害生产活动的前提下对租金征税的最有效方式。他们认为,若政策制定者采纳这一做法,法国的财政痛苦便是不必要的。

相关文章

原文

I’m sitting in a macroeconomics strategy review held by my employers economics team, and they are staring dumbfounded at the french sovereign bond yield and it is evident they don’t know exactly why this is happening, nor what to do with it. The French government and opposition seems to also have no better ideas, seemingly paralyzed.

Everyone can see that France needs some change to their fiscal system, but even the most expert policymakers are scratching their heads. The only two options seemingly on the table feel unworkable:

  1. Savings, cut spending, is something the french populace seem unwilling to accept
  2. Taxes will surely slow an already strained economy

Half of the debate thinks that the people can take it, they just need to work harder. The other half believes the economy can afford to pay out a bit more. Neither are correct (although perhaps some are closer).

Not to sound too grandiose, because it isn’t my idea at its core, but myself and my co-author have written a paper that can explain what is going on.

Pinning the Wage to Scarcity and Technology by Johan Båge, Stella Wilson :: SSRN

That’s a somewhat heavy macroeconomics theory paper, so here’s one analogy of what we have developed: we split “capitalism” into two

  1. Good capitalism: Returns from capital that come from real growth, development, innovation.
  2. Bad capitalism: Returns from capital that does not develop and improve the economy. The academic term is economic rent and rent seeking.

And then the policy you want is simple: Tax the bad capitalism, don’t tax the good capitalism. If this sounds familiar, it’s quite close to the 150 year old theory of Henry George and Georgism. How do you tax the bad capitalism? Well, some parts of it are hard, and some are less hard, but the theoretically most effective method is using both a tax and a benefit, specifically a Land Value Tax (LVT) that pays out a Universal Basic Income (UBI).

That’s it. You’re welcome. If I sound annoyed it’s because I am. None of this pain and hardship and confusion is necessary. France just needs to read my paper.

If you’re interested in understanding a bit further, we’ve made an explainer video in the style of 3blue1brown here:

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com