接下来的4000个表情符号长什么样?
What do the next 4000 emoji look like?

原始链接: https://jenniferdaniel.substack.com/p/what-do-the-next-4000-emoji-look

Emoji最初是表示物体与状态的实用简写;但随着符号集扩大,用户开始把它们重新用作比喻、语气和语法——就像古代文字从记录货物演变为抽象表达一样。早期emoji节省带宽;后来的标准化增加了更多名词,但组合与修饰可能比无尽的新图标更重要。未来的emoji或许会将基础图标与方向滑动、强度修饰和语义复合结合,像积木一样,而不是增加成千上万的静态字形。最终,书写系统靠重新组合简单元素来表达复杂思想而存续,emoji很可能走同一条路。

该 HN 帖子讨论了一篇链接文章,内容关于未来 4000 个 emoji 可能长什么样,以及 emoji 如何融入 Unicode。评论者就 emoji 是否应属于通用文本编码展开辩论:有人认为 emoji 现在已是书写的一部分,也有人认为 Unicode 应仅编码现有文字。技术要点包括字体渲染、跨平台不一致、零宽连接符组合、修饰符、Unicode 庞大的码位空间、汉字统一,以及 emoji 提案的官僚流程。部分用户希望获得更多具体 emoji,如链锯、面部、手部和界面图标,而另一些人认为现有集合过多、被过度使用或幼稚。还有人认为 emoji 对语气、情感和表达很有用。帖子还涉及 Apple 的 Emoji Playground、自定义表情符号,以及 HN 会剥离评论中 emoji 的讽刺现象。总体而言,反应褒贬不一:既欣赏 emoji 的交流价值,也对标准化和泛滥持怀疑态度。
相关文章

原文

There are only so many times you can scroll past an 🫀, 🦡, 🫔, 🛴, and a 🏪 just to locate a 🏆 emoji before you give up and settle for “nice job”.

Right now, buried in our phones, sits a library of nearly four thousand tiny drawings. And yet it feels like not enough. Every year, more requests are filed for more objects, more animals, more more. If this is what four thousand emoji looks like, what are the next four thousand supposed to be?

Fortunately, thousands of years of writing systems walked 🚶‍➡️so emoji could run 🏃‍➡️. From clay slabs to touchscreens, human communication seems to follow a pattern. We start by cataloging physical objects because our brains can’t remember thirty crates of barley. Then we run out of room, panic, and stretch those pictures into metaphors. Before long, nouns aren't enough so we twist the images into mood, tone, and full-blown grammar.

👀 Sound 👀 familiar 👀 ? 👀

In 3200 BCE Mesopotamia, scribes weren't pressing reeds into mud to compose love letters or dirty jokes (yet); they were shaping clay tokens to take inventory of sheep and beer jugs to prove nobody stole a cow en route to Uruk.

Five millennia later, we faced a similar situation on mobile screens in 1999. The original 176 emoji were less an emotional experiment than bandwidth conservation. A sun, a train, a coffee cup: instant shorthand for the late-nineties commuter to say the day had started, they were on the train, and they needed to grab a drink. 🌞🚆☕

Then, when the Unicode Consortium standardized emoji in 2010, the list didn't stop there. Instead, people asked, “What’s missing?”

Don’t have a burrito? Add a burrito 🌯.

Don’t have a microscope? Add a microscope 🔬.

Don’t forget about hedgehogs 🦔.

Early on, encoding included a loaf 🍞, a baguette 🥖, a croissant 🥐, and a pretzel 🥨. Notably, once an emoji enters Unicode, it never gets removed, so we continued to carb load but the inclusion of one is the exclusion of another.

Humans are myth-makers, and our instinct to tell stories runs wild in this next phase. Scribes in Sumer and Egypt broke this noun logjam by repurposing glyphs for abstract concepts. In Sumerian, an arrow stood for “ti”, which also happened to mean ‘life.’ Egyptian scribes pulled the same trick with a sun. It started as literal sunshine, then stretched into ‘day,’ then just ‘time’ itself.

Millennia later, we run the exact same play in our group chats. We aren’t seeing an increase in the skull 💀 emoji because we are freaks for True Crime podcasts. We’re dying of laughter. We aren’t dropping clown 🤡 emoji because Barnum & Bailey is in town. As for the eggplant 🍆 and the peach 🍑? Nobody is buying groceries with these emoji.

Eventually, writing systems organize ambiguity. Egyptian scribes appended determinatives, silent classifier glyphs that were never pronounced aloud, to tell the reader which conceptual category the word belonged to. Walking legs (𓂻) meant movement; a seated woman (𓁐) indicated female names.

Emoji are our modern equivalents. They sit at the edges of our sentences to establish tone and clarify our intent. Take a sentence as volatile as "I'm going to kill you." Standalone, I’m calling 9-1-1. Tack on a loudly of ryongface like, “I'm going to kill you 😭” and now we’re both laughing. Add a wink 😉 and blood rushes to my face, you flirt. One tiny pictograph completely changes the legal classification of the message.

We treat them like volume knobs, stacking flames to crank up the heat (🔥 vs.🔥🔥🔥🔥) and we reach for messy, hard-to-name gut feelings like Melting Face (🫠), Saluting Face (🫡), or Holding Back Tears (🥹) because words … fail me.

When someone drops 💀 under a video, your brain doesn’t sound out s-k-u-l-l. Depending on the context, you might think, “I’m dead,” “unhinged,” or simply a silent, physical exhale of amusement. It dumps the meaning straight into your skull. How do you pronounce these in your head? As words … or as tone?

You are amazing 🔥 → Sincere hype.

You are amazing 🔥🔥🔥🔥 → With great enthusiasm.

🔥 you 🔥 are 🔥 amazing 🔥 → Rhythmic emphasizing cadence.

You are amazing 🏆🎆✨🔥💪🤩💅 → Pure expressive exuberance.

You 🫶 are ✨ amazing ✨🎆🍆💦💦💦🦪🥵🏆 → Horny, chaos mode.

Emoji aren’t a language you can speak with your voice, and yet they give us a voice. They are the facial twitches and raised eyebrows that flat text stripped out of speech. They shrug, smirk, lean in, and give us a look up and down so that horny text doesn’t have to do it alone.

If the last five thousand years of writing has taught us anything, it’s that emoji won't mature by stuffing 4,000 more noun buttons into an already bloated keyboard. It moves forward through flexible visual modifiers and tone ligatures that combine on the fly. While speculative, my mind wanders to…… …. .

  • Directional ligatures: Instead of adding separate glyphs for pointing left, right, up, down, you tap a base icon and swipe a trajectory. A car moving forward is a commute; a car flipped reverse is a retreat.

  • Tone and intensity diacritics: Just as acute accents or umlauts alter the sound of a vowel, visual modifiers can alter emotional volume. A small heat shimmer modifier turns 🔥 into mild warmth or an inferno without cluttering the drawer with five separate flame designs.

  • Semantic compounds: Think about how Korean Hangul snaps consonants and vowels into neat syllable blocks, or how Chinese pairs radical classifiers with phonetic roots. We already do this under the hood with Zero-Width Joiners (this is how we glue a face to a cloud to make Face in Clouds 😶‍🌫️). The future isn’t inventing a brand-new glyphs for every hybrid concept; but maybe it could be combining existing primitives together like Lego bricks.

A writing system collapses long before it can successfully itemize our physical reality. Scribes figured out five thousand years ago that you can't carve the entire world onto a rock. Mesopotamia did not draw every type of sheep. Egypt did not draw every fish in the Nile. Their writing systems survived because people quit counting livestock and started snapping pieces together to build weird, ambitious ideas. ⛲

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com