最高法院“雪佛龙”裁决后,拜登事实上的电动汽车授权面临风险
Biden's De Facto EV Mandate At Risk After Supreme Court "Chevron" Ruling

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/bidens-de-facto-ev-mandate-risk-after-supreme-court-chevron-ruling

最高法院最近决定限制雪佛龙公司的服从,这是一项赋予联邦机构解释不明确法律的能力的法律原则,削弱了拜登政府新制定的更严格的尾气排放标准。 这一原则于 1984 年制定,赋予了环境保护局 (EPA) 等联邦机构更大的权力来执行法律,例如根据他们自己的解释,执行《清洁空气法》。 然而,上周五的判决剥夺了这一权力,可能使美国环保局更难通过模糊的立法来监管影响环境和公共健康的行业。 其影响远远超出了石油和天然气行业,因为美国环保署几周前最终确定的新尾气排放标准现在可能因这一司法进展而受到挑战。 严格的排放标准声称可以节省成本、创造就业机会并显着减少二氧化碳排放,但在有关 EPA 对车辆污染法规管辖权的持续讨论中,这些标准面临着新的审查。 在最新裁决之前,美国石油协会(API)已针对新汽车排放标准发起诉讼。 API 认为 EPA 制定这些法规超出了其界限,他们声称这些法规将在未来十年内基本上逐步淘汰大多数传统汽油汽车和传统混合动力汽车。

相关文章

原文

By Charles Kennedy of OilPrice.com

The Biden Administration’s new strict tailpipe emission standards have just become particularly vulnerable after the Supreme Court overturned last week a 40-year-old landmark ruling, known as the ‘Chevron deference’, which granted federal agencies the authority to interpret ambiguous laws.

The precedent, set in 1984 in a case involving the oil giant, gave federal agencies more power to interpret ambiguous laws. But last Friday’s Supreme Court ruling will strip federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), from the power of interpreting laws, such as the Clean Air Act, and how to apply them.   

The U.S. top court ruling will have wide-reaching implications for the oil and gas industry because it will make it more difficult for federal agencies to regulate the environment and public health, based on their interpretation of ambiguous laws.

The tailpipe emissions limits, which the EPA finalized just a few weeks ago, look especially vulnerable in light of the Supreme Court ruling, environmental law attorneys have told Reuters.

In March, the EPA announced the finalization of new tailpipe emission standards. The agency boasted that these were the strictest standards ever, adding that they would save money, create jobs, and eliminate billions of tons of CO2 emissions.

The ruling adds to already heated debates about whether the EPA has authority to regulate emissions from vehicles, they said.

“There have been longstanding debates about whether and to what extent the (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) has the authority to regulate emissions from mobile sources,” Sherry Jackman, an environmental litigator and compliance counselor at Greenberg Glusker in Los Angeles, told Reuters.

Even before the Supreme Court ruling last week, the American Petroleum Institute (API) challenged the new tailpipe emissions rules in court.

API sued the EPA over the vehicle emission standards, with Senior Vice President and General Counsel Ryan Meyers saying that “EPA has exceeded its congressional authority with this regulation that will eliminate most new gas cars and traditional hybrids from the U.S. market in less than a decade.”

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com