最高法院做出豁免决定后,特朗普将采取行动推翻曼哈顿定罪
Trump Moves To Overturn Manhattan Conviction After Supreme Court Immunity Decision

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-moves-overturn-manhattan-conviction-after-supreme-court-immunity-decision

前总统唐纳德·特朗普在美国最高法院授予他在总统任期内采取的行动豁免权后,试图撤销他最近在曼哈顿因性行为不端指控而被定罪的判决,并推迟了对 34 项重罪指控的即将判决。 他的法律团队向胡安·梅尔尚法官致函,寻求授权提交一项动议,质疑该判决,同时考虑该判决对特朗普总统行为的影响。 尽管由于曼哈顿案件的性质侧重于特朗普上任前的行为,特朗普的论点似乎站不住脚,但他的律师计划辩称,该案的某些方面受到了他任职期间获得的证据的影响。 最高法院的裁决禁止指控现任总统的官方行为,但禁止在随后的诉讼中引用此类证据。 然而,曼哈顿地区检察官办公室是否计划挑战这一策略、法官是否推迟宣判、或者默钦如何应对可能监禁或豁免总统所带来的前所未有的困境,目前仍不确定。 特朗普的努力似乎阻止了预期的量刑建议和初步法庭行动。 此外,特朗普面临的其他正在进行的刑事审判,例如华盛顿特区的刑事审判,已被搁置或重新安排。

相关文章

原文

Hours after the US Supreme Court granted Donald Trump immunity for official acts committed in office, the former president began an effort to toss his recent conviction in Manhattan and postpone his upcoming sentencing over 34 felony counts related to his cover-up of a sex scandal leading up to the 2016 US election.

In a letter to judge Juan Merchan just hours after the Supreme Court ruling - and 10 days before he's set for sentencing, Trump's lawyers sought permission to file a motion to set aside the verdict while Merchan considers whether the Supreme Court ruling affects the conviction.

That said, Trump's attempt might be a long shot given the fact that the Manhattan case revolves around acts Trump took as a candidate, not as president.

As the NY Times notes, however, Trump's lawyers are likely to argue that prosecutors partially built their case using evidence from his time in office. Under the Supreme Court's new ruling, prosecutors may not charge a president for official acts, but also cannot cite evidence involving official acts that affect other accusations.

It is unclear how the Manhattan district attorney’s office, which brought the case, will respond, or whether the judge will delay the first sentencing of an American president. But Mr. Trump’s effort appeared to cause at least a brief interruption: The district attorney’s office did not on Monday make a sentencing recommendation to the judge about whether to imprison Mr. Trump, as was expected.

Merchan may also punt on the request, as the deadline for filing post-trial motions ended last month. Instead, Merchan may instruct Trump's attorneys to raise the issue when they appeal the conviction post-sentencing.

As the Times further notes, Merchan faces an 'unprecedented conundrum' with massive legal and political ramifications. Imprisoning Trump would drop-kick a hornet's nest, while sparing Trump from prison would immediately draw the wrath of vengeful Democrats who say he gave Trump special treatment.

While there's no requirement that Trump be sentenced to time behind bars, Merchan could sentence him to months or several years in prison - or he could be sentenced to home confinement or probation. He could also postpone any sentence until after the election, or after Trump serves another term in office, should be he reelected.

Meanwhile, Trump's other criminal cases have been largely derailed or otherwise postponed - including his trial in Washington DC, where he stands accused of mishandling classified information while still in office.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com